At 01:40 AM 9/4/2009, Steven Krivit wrote:
Steve and Vortex,
About a year ago, I think it was, the Wikipedia cold fusion haters
blacklisted New Energy Times because I added some links to - heaven
forbid - the NET site which I thought would be useful. You know, the
Internet is good for Wiki,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Dunno -- I'm not sure I was on the same wavelength as their search box.
I think it's case sensitive:
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/JzG
Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote:
Dunno -- I'm not sure I was on the same wavelength as their search box.
I think it's case sensitive:
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/JzG
Oops.
Thanks.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
There is any amount of anti-cold fusion material from mainstream
sources. It has no depth.
Mainstream? Jed, you've swallowed a bill of goods. There is no
mainstream. Or, rather, there are many. Is the ACS mainstream? Is
Oxford University Press . . .
Please note
At 12:33 PM 9/4/2009, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
I was unable to make contact with Wikipedia Administrator JzG (Guy
Chapman), but some of his fan club has some things about him at
encyclopediadramatica.com. Just type in jzg in the search box.
Typed in jzq in the
At 12:07 PM 9/4/2009, Steven Krivit wrote:
I was unable to make contact with Wikipedia Administrator JzG (Guy
Chapman), but some of his fan club has some things about him at
encyclopediadramatica.com. Just type in jzg in the search box. Don't
go to encyclopediadramatica.com if you are easily
There is no page titled jzq.
jzg, not jzq. Hard to see.
somewhat case sensitive.
so JzG is the optimal way
stands for Just zis guy, slang for just this guy
At 05:36 PM 9/4/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
There is any amount of anti-cold fusion material from mainstream
sources. It has no depth.
Mainstream? Jed, you've swallowed a bill of goods. There is no
mainstream. Or, rather, there are many. Is the ACS mainstream? Is
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Please note that I did not say that all mainstream media is opposed to cold
fusion.
Nor did I say that they were. I said there is no mainstream. It's a myth,
an appearance, a phenomenon without boundaries. However, sometimes these are
useful.
I think you are
At 10:16 PM 9/4/2009, you wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
think you are quibbling. This is a bit like saying there is no
Democratic Party because the Democrats are unorganized and they
seldom agree among themselves. Okay, the Party may be nebulous but
they have a headquarters and they
Jed spoke of this on the list. He has been falsely accused of
printing articles without the author's permission.
Terry
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:44 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V
Johnsonsvj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up on the recent cnn.com video clip concerning erroneous
entries I
If I'm banned from Wikipeida, as may happen in short order, the
biggest reason will be prolixity. Warning: this is long. If it does
not interest you, please don't read it, it will only irritate you.
At 10:44 AM 9/3/2009, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Following up on the recent cnn.com
At 11:20 AM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
Jed spoke of this on the list. He has been falsely accused of
printing articles without the author's permission.
I'll give some detail on that. It's a little more complicated.
The basic reason for blacklisting of the site was that it was fringe
advocacy, and
From Terry,
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
:-)
I would like to add my complements to the chef as well.
I found Abd's analysis to be both informative and educational.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
If I'm banned from Wikipeida, as may happen in short order, the
biggest reason will be prolixity.
No, the biggest reason will be the message you just posted here, plus
the fact that you are part of this discussion group.
In response to this article:
I just checked Wikipedia for the first time in months. Their latest
shenanigan is to delete Dieter Britz's site. They made up some strange
sounding reason. It is kind of funny because Britz is on their side. He is a
skeptic who does not believe cold fusion is real.
Since we cannot do anything to
At 02:26 PM 9/3/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
Typing. I bought Dragonspeak when I had a carpal tunnel release, but
never used it.
Steve and Vortex,
About a year ago, I think it was, the Wikipedia cold fusion haters
blacklisted New Energy Times because I added some links to - heaven forbid
- the NET site which I thought would be useful. You know, the Internet is
good for Wiki, it's good for NET too - we're both vehicles
At 07:07 PM 9/3/2009, you wrote:
At 02:26 PM 9/3/2009, Terry Blanton wrote:
Thanks for expounding on that, Abd. I'm curious, are you typing or
using a voxrec s/w like Dragonspeak?
Typing. I bought Dragonspeak when I had a carpal tunnel release, but never
used it.
brevity?
naw!
At 06:33 PM 9/3/2009, Michel Jullian wrote:
Indeed, thanks for the most interesting summary, Abd! So you have now
logically decided to see by yourself whether CF is real or not?
Well, I'm pretty well convinced, from the published evidence, that
it's real. However, that conclusion isn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
