Re: [Vo]:new paper atpublished on Ego Out
I think you should have talked more about how Ed Storms is wrong and how you are right. On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Let's get right down to the study of antennas and *Antenna Basics*. Suppose one day you're walking down the street and a kind but impatient person runs up and asks you to design an antenna for them. Sure, you quickly reply, adding what is the desired frequency, gain, bandwidth, impedance, and polarization? Or perhaps you have never heard of (or are a little rusty) on the above parameters. Before we can design an antenna or discuss antenna types, we must understand the basics of antennas, which are the fundamental parameters that characterize an antenna. Ed Storms uses the design methodology of random chance. Ed says that if we can produce enough plasmon antennas, some of them will work just on the weight of the numbers of antennae produced. Rossi on the other hand spent six months of intensive experimental effort working day and night to design his antennae by blind trial and error. At the end of that experimental sequence, Rossi came up with the design of his plasmonic antenna that was the best that he could find and did the job for him. Both design methods are equally valid if that method works. There is a flaw in Ed storms method that takes his method out of the LENR design toolbox. From time to time, the numbers of his randomized antennas are not numerous enough to get to the takeoff point where the LENR reaction can be sustained on randomized antenna production. Rossi’s fixed design can get his system to the point where his plasmonic antennae can be produced in sufficient numbers to increase the LENR reactivity of the NiH reaction. In analogy, the first stage of Ed Storms antenna rocket in not powerful enough to get him into space on a regular basis. Sometimes it gets into orbit but sometimes this system falls into the ocean. In other words it fails to take off from time to time. Rossi’s first stage is strong enough to get him into orbit every time because he kept at the antenna design process until his fixed antenna structure worked every time for him. But to Rossi’s dismay, sometimes randomized antenna production goes too far and his reactor melts down. There will be a time that the analytical and scientific design of plasmonic antennae will be routinely applied to LENR reactor design, but until awareness of that method grows, lesser design methods will have to do. In closing, I find it ironic that Ed Storms does not accept the principle of dynamic NAE generation as applicable to what LENR experimentation shows, but then he advocates this randomized antenna production process as the keystone of his method. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends, Good answers are still rare in the field of LENR. so let's try with good questions: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/lenr-theories-or-principles.html Is this good? It is used to confront an answer to the question How does LENR work?- diven by Ed Storns. Ed wanted his new theory thoroughly discussed It is very probable that positive opinions will prevail therefore what I say here will have not much impact. It will be just an opportunity for reinforcing the theory. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:new paper atpublished on Ego Out
You forgot pulse repetition factor and pulse duration in the case where you want to transmit high power levels and induce strong, quickly changing electromagnetic fields, but not cook people or maybe melt your powder (immediately) On Sunday, July 27, 2014, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Let's get right down to the study of antennas and *Antenna Basics*. Suppose one day you're walking down the street and a kind but impatient person runs up and asks you to design an antenna for them. Sure, you quickly reply, adding what is the desired frequency, gain, bandwidth, impedance, and polarization? Or perhaps you have never heard of (or are a little rusty) on the above parameters. Before we can design an antenna or discuss antenna types, we must understand the basics of antennas, which are the fundamental parameters that characterize an antenna. Ed Storms uses the design methodology of random chance. Ed says that if we can produce enough plasmon antennas, some of them will work just on the weight of the numbers of antennae produced. Rossi on the other hand spent six months of intensive experimental effort working day and night to design his antennae by blind trial and error. At the end of that experimental sequence, Rossi came up with the design of his plasmonic antenna that was the best that he could find and did the job for him. Both design methods are equally valid if that method works. There is a flaw in Ed storms method that takes his method out of the LENR design toolbox. From time to time, the numbers of his randomized antennas are not numerous enough to get to the takeoff point where the LENR reaction can be sustained on randomized antenna production. Rossi’s fixed design can get his system to the point where his plasmonic antennae can be produced in sufficient numbers to increase the LENR reactivity of the NiH reaction. In analogy, the first stage of Ed Storms antenna rocket in not powerful enough to get him into space on a regular basis. Sometimes it gets into orbit but sometimes this system falls into the ocean. In other words it fails to take off from time to time. Rossi’s first stage is strong enough to get him into orbit every time because he kept at the antenna design process until his fixed antenna structure worked every time for him. But to Rossi’s dismay, sometimes randomized antenna production goes too far and his reactor melts down. There will be a time that the analytical and scientific design of plasmonic antennae will be routinely applied to LENR reactor design, but until awareness of that method grows, lesser design methods will have to do. In closing, I find it ironic that Ed Storms does not accept the principle of dynamic NAE generation as applicable to what LENR experimentation shows, but then he advocates this randomized antenna production process as the keystone of his method. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','peter.gl...@gmail.com'); wrote: Dear Friends, Good answers are still rare in the field of LENR. so let's try with good questions: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/lenr-theories-or-principles.html Is this good? It is used to confront an answer to the question How does LENR work?- diven by Ed Storns. Ed wanted his new theory thoroughly discussed It is very probable that positive opinions will prevail therefore what I say here will have not much impact. It will be just an opportunity for reinforcing the theory. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Re: [Vo]:new paper atpublished on Ego Out
Let's get right down to the study of antennas and *Antenna Basics*. Suppose one day you're walking down the street and a kind but impatient person runs up and asks you to design an antenna for them. Sure, you quickly reply, adding what is the desired frequency, gain, bandwidth, impedance, and polarization? Or perhaps you have never heard of (or are a little rusty) on the above parameters. Before we can design an antenna or discuss antenna types, we must understand the basics of antennas, which are the fundamental parameters that characterize an antenna. Ed Storms uses the design methodology of random chance. Ed says that if we can produce enough plasmon antennas, some of them will work just on the weight of the numbers of antennae produced. Rossi on the other hand spent six months of intensive experimental effort working day and night to design his antennae by blind trial and error. At the end of that experimental sequence, Rossi came up with the design of his plasmonic antenna that was the best that he could find and did the job for him. Both design methods are equally valid if that method works. There is a flaw in Ed storms method that takes his method out of the LENR design toolbox. From time to time, the numbers of his randomized antennas are not numerous enough to get to the takeoff point where the LENR reaction can be sustained on randomized antenna production. Rossi’s fixed design can get his system to the point where his plasmonic antennae can be produced in sufficient numbers to increase the LENR reactivity of the NiH reaction. In analogy, the first stage of Ed Storms antenna rocket in not powerful enough to get him into space on a regular basis. Sometimes it gets into orbit but sometimes this system falls into the ocean. In other words it fails to take off from time to time. Rossi’s first stage is strong enough to get him into orbit every time because he kept at the antenna design process until his fixed antenna structure worked every time for him. But to Rossi’s dismay, sometimes randomized antenna production goes too far and his reactor melts down. There will be a time that the analytical and scientific design of plasmonic antennae will be routinely applied to LENR reactor design, but until awareness of that method grows, lesser design methods will have to do. In closing, I find it ironic that Ed Storms does not accept the principle of dynamic NAE generation as applicable to what LENR experimentation shows, but then he advocates this randomized antenna production process as the keystone of his method. On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Friends, Good answers are still rare in the field of LENR. so let's try with good questions: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/07/lenr-theories-or-principles.html Is this good? It is used to confront an answer to the question How does LENR work?- diven by Ed Storns. Ed wanted his new theory thoroughly discussed It is very probable that positive opinions will prevail therefore what I say here will have not much impact. It will be just an opportunity for reinforcing the theory. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
