-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
May I change the initial window size of wxterangreal to 800x600? I think
that's a pretty safe size these days, and 640x480 is unusable.
Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lalo Martins wrote:
I have a semi-functional extension for server-side python scripting.
You can `bzr get` it from http://lalo.revisioncontrol.net/bzr/vos-python/
One thing, I wonder what the need for the ProxyListener is? If you
want to use a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Or Botton wrote:
The guys from LindenLab (SecondLife) have been hard at work trying to
implement FireFox into their virtual-world enviroment. So far it looks
pretty good - check this out: http://ubrowser.com/
Their own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Karsten Otto wrote:
Hello,
I am currently trying to build the current VOS prerelease (vos-0.23.0-pre1)
on my G5 PowerMac,
but I encounter a number of problems. Did anybody succeed in compiling VOS on
the Mac?
I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Reed Hedges wrote:
May I change the initial window size of wxterangreal to 800x600? I think
that's a pretty safe size these days, and 640x480 is unusable.
Reed
Yes, go for it. I'm glad to see you've found some time to work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Reed Hedges wrote:
What is the minimum WxWidgets version we are supporting for compiling
wxTerangreal? 2.4 or 2.6?
As far as I am concerned, I am only developing with 2.6. I guess if it is
relatively easy we can continue to
And so says Reed Hedges on 12/02/06 04:12...
One thing, I wonder what the need for the ProxyListener is? If you
want to use a message handler instead of a listener, you just have to
handle the update messages. On the other hand, having API
specifically for implementing listeners is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Amstutz wrote:
Yea, it sounds like Lalo has something different in mind, so perhaps the
way to go is to go ahead with two different Python bindings and
eventually have a bake-off to decide which is better :-)\
Lalo, ideally your API would