Lalo Martins wrote:
> Oooh, interesting thought. Would types and contextual names be allowed
> to be unicode too?
Probably not,
It would be nice I guess, but I don't think it's at all neccesary. Plus,
then URLs would be potentially multibyte or otherwise in obscure
encodings and that would caus
And so says Reed Hedges on 07/09/05 10:02...
> (1) it's an extra pain in the neck for developers (i.e.
> programmer-users) to worry about, especially coming from worlds like
> C and descendents where the notion of non-ascii character sets are a
> very recent addition and not a natural part of the
