Hi,
I have downloaded and examined VG a few weeks ago. I did not care for it
compared to VTCL. I find the methodology of VTCL more user friendly (at least
for me). I would personaly like to see the development of VTCL continue.
me too !! :-)
andreas sievers
On 20 March 2000, you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
I would be interested to hear your thoughts on how to select maintainers
(no more than two) for vtcl. It may be obvious to those who track the list
in which case nominations are in order (or nominate yourself).
A word or two on the
Eric Bresie wrote:
I was just noticing this...
http://sourceforge.net/project/?group_id=285
It seems like the cvs tree that's on there has a lot of 1.2 code imported,
however I am curious if any changes that may have been made on this one
differ from the 1.3 code?
Also..can we move
Rick Macdonald wrote:
There are some features missing for me in vTcl that I don't think are
easily added:
This first one might not be so hard.
- multi source file development.
The biggest deal here is that all the code that is sourced into
vtcl becomes part of the vtcl project. By that I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
A word or two on the 1.3 source base. As it stands, 1.3 runs and saves
but cannot re-load a project it has saved. I began to change the file
format to something more modular. The UI has changed significantly. I was
working on a tabbed panel for preferences and
yes, I decided to follow the linux kernel model for versioning.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, J.R.Suckling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
A word or two on the 1.3 source base. As it stands, 1.3 runs and saves
but cannot re-load a project it has saved. I began to change the file
format
En fecha Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ud. escribió :
Hi,
I have downloaded and examined VG a few weeks ago. I did not care for it
compared to VTCL. I find the methodology of VTCL more user friendly (at least
for me). I would personaly like to see the development of VTCL continue.
me too !!
Well...glad to here you are keeping busy.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's true that I've begun to transition vtcl to sourceforge. The 1.2 and
1.3 CVS trees have been
imported. What's there is the most current stuff I have. I would also
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
J.R.Suckling
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vtcl] anything new since 1.2.0?
Rick Macdonald wrote:
There are some features missing for me in vTcl that I don't think are
easily
Andreas Sievers wrote to me :
Hi Stewart,
I have downloaded and examined VG a few weeks ago. I did not care for it
compared to VTCL. I find the methodology of VTCL more user friendly (at least
for me). I would personaly like to see the development of VTCL continue.
me too !! :-)
andreas
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Eric Bresie wrote:
What do you mean when you say it doesn't do dynamic widget creation? As I
understand vtcl, it is more for making the gui and you fill in how the gui
reacts (when it's loaded, when it's hidden)
Eric - please see my responses to his reply to my original
Hello,
Put the source statement in your main function.
That way it will be part of your application and not VTCL.
Example:
#--
# PcDevMenu.tcl
#--
OK!
Here is an example of how to call one TCL/TK Application From another along with
some other tricks of the trade.
Example.
#--
# Menu.tcl
#--
set
Me Three
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rodrigo Alfonso Guzmán [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/21/2000 01:16:52 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Ralph McCord/CIMG/CVG)
Subject: Re: WG:Re: [vtcl] anything new since 1.2.0?
En fecha Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Ud.
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Put the source statement in your main function.
That way it will be part of your application and not VTCL.
Well, as soon as you click on the vTcl TEST button, those procs become
part of the vTcl application because the main funciton is executed.
15 matches
Mail list logo
