Hi Patrick,
On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Patrick Gansterer wrote:
[snip]
1. There's also the Wx port, but they don't seem very interested in
switching and it seems the build system is very low maintenance.
There is still a patch at webkit.org/b/73100 for adding CMake files for Wx.
The
, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
To be honest, I think I know more about the wx port, and would probably be
better able to cleanly remove it from the tree, than you would. As I've said
Hi Benjamin,
On Feb 10, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
Hi again,
While looking into DRT changes, I notice there is zero activity on the
wxWidgets implementation.
Looking at WebCore/WebKit, excluding general changes, the last commit for
wxWidgets is 6 months old:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
I actually have recently been working on a patch to get trunk building again,
though. The path of least resistance for me would simply be to ask people
Hi Martin,
On Feb 11, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Martin Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Kevin Ollivier
kev...@theolliviers.com wrote:
The project is not dead per-se, but it's true that it's not very active
these days. Recently, I haven't had a lot of time to devote to the port
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
Hi Everyone,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Asking people to ignore wx is basically the same as having the code outside
the tree. Having the code outside the tree would make this change effective
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Martin Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Actually, it will, if anything, increase the workload. Because I use waf, I
am able to use Python to auto-generate the list of sources to build. In
other
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Martin Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Actually
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Martin Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Actually
On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 2:01 PM
On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
I know you're speaking more in general here, but just to be clear, over the
past 6
Hi Darin,
On Nov 2, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Nov 2, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
There are a few related goals here that I'm aware of:
a) Separate WTF out of JavaScriptCore since it doesn't logically belong
there, but was simply a convenient home for it.
b) Separate
Hi Mark,
On Nov 4, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-11-04, at 10:57, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Nov 4, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Steve Falkenburg wrote:
On Nov 4, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
Step (2) here involves coming up with a good solution for export
On May 12, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Levin wrote:
Layout/ # Would be nice to have a better name since these test much
more than Layout
DumpRenderTreeTests?
Integration?
AutomatedHtmlTests?
Here are some characteristics of these tests
Hi all,
I've got a patch that has been waiting in the queue for over a day now, and
it's still in position #6 for cr-linux and #7 for cr-mac. The position has
changed over that time, so it seems the bots are processing patches, but
they're going incredibly slowly. All the other bots finished
, in different states, owned
by different companies and running different OSes! So I suspect
something changed on src.chromium.org.
-eric
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a patch that has been waiting in the queue for over a day now
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 14:05, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 13:06, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Dec 22, 2010, at
On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 14:51, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 14:05, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 13:06, Adam Barth
On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 16:21, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 14:51, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2011-02-09, at 14:05, Adam Barth wrote
Hi Hajime,
On Nov 16, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Hajime Morita wrote:
Hi WebKit folks,
I'm thinking about porting Hunspell-based spellchecking code
from Chromium to WebKit/WebCore.
Although it's unclear whether the porting is feasible, I'd like to
hear how much interest is there from other ports
Hi Maciej,
On Aug 13, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
Are there currently any plans for simplifying the situation regarding build
systems? I haven't seen any threads for a while, which I assume means no.
Is there any low
Hi Jeremy,
On Aug 12, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David Kilzer ddkil...@webkit.org wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Dumitru Daniliuc d...@chromium.org wrote:
i completely agree with jeremy. is it possible to at least drop the cryptic
Hi all,
I'm working on making the CPP DOM bindings accessible to the wx port, and while
I've got the whole thing building, one thing I have yet to sort out is how to
add building of the CPP DOM bindings to the build system. DerivedSources.make
seems to be the appropriate place to put the code,
Hi all,
I'd like to start adding some wx-specific tests for our port's API, at least
initially using Python, and since I've noticed a lot of changes being made to
the testing infrastructure over the past few months or so (Perl - Python
transition, etc.), I was wondering if someone would mind
Hi all,
I'm trying to switch over to building JavaScriptCore as a shared library for
the wx port, but one issue I'm hitting is the issue of export symbols. I was
wondering how other ports handle this? I know Apple / Win and Apple / Mac have
export symbol files, but I'd like to avoid manually
of code rot. Are you guys patching a git branch or something?
Thanks,
Kevin
Cheers,
Kenneth
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to switch over to building JavaScriptCore as a shared library for
the wx port, but one issue
Hi Maciej,
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic
Hi Marc-Antoine,
On Apr 17, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
2010/4/17 Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
Hi Maciej,
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam
Hi Peter,
On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:42 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Anyway, my $0.02 is that, in terms of immediate bang for the buck, we're
probably better off trying to synchronize the build systems automatically
Hi Nikolas,
On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Adam Treat:
I am very skeptical that it is feasible to write a gyp generator that would
output QMake files. There is a log of magic in those QMake files. My sense
is
that it would not be
Hi Evan,
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Evan Martin wrote:
On Tuesday some people gathered to discuss the build-system bingo
within WebKit and what we can do to reduce (if not unify) the number
of project files you need to modify when you rename a file. I took
the stage as a representative of
Hi,
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:15 PM, AS wrote:
Hello
I'm looking into adding bindings for Python to the webkit DOM objects.
Ideally, what I would like to create is WebKit based application that can use
Python for DHTML manipulation.
From the code, I can see how there are perl scripts
Hi Dan,
On Dec 1, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Dan Bernstein wrote:
On Nov 29, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
Hi all,
The wx port is starting to look at getting proper support for complex text,
and one of the first places I started looking at was the Win and Mac port
implementations
Hi all,
The wx port is starting to look at getting proper support for complex text, and
one of the first places I started looking at was the Win and Mac port
implementations. I noticed that the complex text code in FontWin.cpp and
FontComplexTextMac.cpp is largely the same, passing the heavy
Hi Zoltan,
On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
Hi Kevin,
WebKit approach is NOT to free memory before quit to make the quit
process
as fast as possible. The memory manager should free the unfreed
objects.
However, this approach makes really hard to find the real leaks
Hi all,
Well, I've finally submitted the patches for building wxWebKit using
waf. They're available from here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27619
I've tried to keep the patches how you guys like them - under 5KB
each. ;-) There's only 6, with one being about 20KB but that can
Hi Peter,
On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:03 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
One belated comment on this topic. It would be neat if some port
agreed to be the guinea pig to see if gyp could plausibly work for
more than Google's
Hi Peter,
On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Of course, the big question is if waf would have the same
limitations as SCons in regards to doing this, but I think it's at
least worth exploring
Hi Jeremy,
On Jul 10, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
[snip]
Your argument makes sense if WebKit is only built for one platform/
build-system
Hi Dimitri and all,
Congrats on getting this into WebKit! Actually, I'm in the middle of a
build system switch as well - to waf, a re-write of scons that removed
many of the performance issues related to searching and calculating
dependencies, and which has added some nice features as well
to generating their build
files using gyp?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
To: Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org
Cc: Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org; WebKit Development webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:52:57 AM
Subject
port)
- wx Bakefile (which will be replaced by waf soon)
- Qt Qmake
- GTK GNUMakefile
- Google's gyp (added recently)
Are any of the other ports going to switch to generating their build
files using gyp?
Dave
- Original Message
From: Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.com
To: Dimitri
Hi Maciej,
On May 25, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 24, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
I don't think it should be discounted. It might be helpful to
clarify why
you think ifdefs are a
Hi Eric,
On May 21, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Interesting analogy. However, closing means to me that the community
is done with the bug. Denying a patch because no one's working on it
anymore (aka, no one is there to respond to review comments even if
you make them) is not the
Hi Antonio,
Yes, I've fixed it now, sorry.
Thanks,
Kevin
On May 20, 2009, at 5:41 AM, tonikitoo (Antonio Gomes) wrote:
Hi,
That is something reproducible by every one who builds libcurl as
network backend in a non-debug build, and really has to be fixed. Code
looks like this:
(...)
is happening. When I run it in a debugger I do not even get it
loading the google.com HTML content.
Thanks,
Kevin
On May 19, 2009, at 8:45 AM, David Kilzer wrote:
Yes, your messages are getting to the list.
Your best bet is to contact the wxWebKit maintainer, Kevin Ollivier,
who I've copied
Hi Meryl,
On May 14, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Meryl Silverburgh wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Ariya Hidayat
ariya.hida...@trolltech.com wrote:
layer at (0,0) size 800x600
RenderView at (0,0) size 800x600
layer at (0,0) size 800x600
RenderBlock {HTML} at (0,0) size 800x600
Hi all,
I'm trying to update the wx port after the addition of JS_EXPORT and
the idea of exporting symbols. However, I'm noticing that jsc.cpp, for
example, uses numerous functions / classes which are not part of
JavaScriptCore/API and are not declared with JS_EXPORT. How is it that
Hi all,
I'm trying to get a box ready to be a Windows build bot for the wx
port, and while trying to build WebKit I've come across an issue with
ENABLE(ASSEMBLER). Apparently this gets enabled only for Safari Win or
Mac as it depends on HAVE(JIT) or HAVE(WREC) being set, but if
Hi Darin,
On Mar 23, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
But I think that all DARWIN-targeted ports and indeed any port where
PLATFORM(CF) is true, should use the superior version based on
CFDateFormatter. That’s an even better fix for Mac OS X.
Thanks, I've put the more limited fix up
Hi Adam,
On Mar 23, 2009, at 7:28 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 6:18 AM, 김인기 wrote:
I want to port WebKit to Windows-Mobile device.
But, I could find only CoreGraphics-port and Cairo-port.
Is there no Windows-GDI-only port?
That is correct, there is no Windows port that only
Hi all,
Gustavo Noronha recently wrote me and pointed out that he did some
work on the GTK port to fix a JSCore test (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/41909
), and said he thought that the fix might also apply to the JSCore
regression we see on the wx port. It does in fact fix the problem,
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the detailed explanation! I just landed a fix based on your
suggestions. It built okay with both the wx and Apple ports, but if it
causes anyone trouble, please let me know!
Thanks,
Kevin
On Mar 14, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
On 2009-03-14, at 10:49, Kevin
Hi Julien,
On Feb 10, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Julien Chaffraix wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Is this patch still valid, i.e. not made obsolete by another
approach?
As far as I know, there is no work towards storing the cookies inside
the database as it is done in Firefox. Furthermore I know no work in
cURL
Hi Julien,
On Feb 9, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Julien Chaffraix wrote:
Hi,
I have Integrated the patch given in
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14730 on webkit r36766 with
additions on SQLITE db calls
As you have seen this patch is not integrated and is a year old. As a
result, it may
Hi Darin,
Sorry about that, should be fixed now. I updated wxPython which broke
the path to the wx-config used for the newer build, and that made it
default to the wx built into Leopard.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Jan 25, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
The WX bot has been failing for a
Hi all,
I'm working on adding HTML editing capabilities to the wxWebKit API,
and I've gotten a lot of things working by exposing the edit commands,
as well as providing a level of DOM wrapping for getting/manipulating
attributes. One thing I've been unable to figure out, though, is how
Hi all,
I sent this message to the mailing list yesterday, but it seems it
never made it, so I'm resending.
Kevin
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kevin Ollivier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 22, 2008 12:13:24 PM PDT
To: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Rename TypeInfo - JSTypeInfo
message did make it to the list, but no one replied.
I think the best approach is to simply create a bug on
bugs.webkit.org and attach a patch for review (since the wx port is
apparently the only one feeling the pain right now :).
Dave
On Tue, 9/23/08, Kevin Ollivier [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
We're having a problem on the Windows version of wxWebKit where
#include typeinfo is actually now including JavaScriptCore/kjs/
TypeInfo.h, which needless to say is not a good thing. ;-) I think
this problem stems from the fact that we (the wx port, that is) don't
use the
Hi Javed,
On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Javed Rabbani wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am trying to build WebKit WX port on Windows. The build process
stops with a fatal error U1077 in cl.exe of Visual Studio 2005. The
error code is 0xc135. Can anyone suggest possible cause of this
things differently on Win.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Kevin Ollivier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
I've hit an issue with the wx port where HTML files that use @import
url(file.css) will not load when the HTML and CSS file are on disk
rather than loaded via the web
Hi all,
I've hit an issue with the wx port where HTML files that use @import
url(file.css) will not load when the HTML and CSS file are on disk
rather than loaded via the web. After tracking it down, I found that I
could resolve the issue by having CURL set the file type for
m_response
Hi David,
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:19 PM, David D. Kilzer wrote:
Kevin Ollivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] The tricky part AFAICT would be XCode, though, because
even if there is a scripted solution for this, it would probably need
to be run on a Mac where we have access to AppleScript
Hi Alp,
On Nov 11, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Alp Toker wrote:
The existing qmake-based build system is shared by the GTK+ and Qt
ports.
Until recently, this arrangement has not been too problematic for the
GTK+ porters, with the idea being that qmake makes life easier for
developers at the expense
Hi Justin,
On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:35 AM, Justin Haygood wrote:
http://blog.justinhaygood.com/2007/11/07/youtube-in-qt-webkit-windows-only/
For more information, see the above blog post.
Basically, it does it by (in a semi-clean way) utiziling the
existing code for Windows plugins, which
Hi all,
I haven't contributed all that much to WTF (yet? ;-), but I wanted to
say I'm certainly fine with any code I wrote being moved to the BSD
license as well.
Kevin
On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:04 PM, George Staikos wrote:
On 6-Nov-07, at 3:54 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Mainly I'd like to
Hi Adam,
On Jul 16, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
[snip]
I think there are probably two approaches to implement it:
1.) Have one GdkWindow for the main Frame of the Page
+ Resource friendly
+ z-order would always be right
- Scrolling would need to be manually handled
Hi Adam,
On May 20, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Hi,
Currently the build, run and debug scripts in WebKitTools/Scripts
are a mashup
of scripts for the various ports. Most of the scripts are written
in perl,
but a few are bash scripts. Some of them use common functions, but
not
Hi Darin and all,
On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Apr 8, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Kevin Ollivier wrote:
One other issue I wanted to bring up that I've run into is an
issue with needing the notImplementedGdk() macro to be defined
even though we're not using the GDK port, as we
70 matches
Mail list logo
