On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Jian Li wrote:
Indeed when I implement BlobResourceHandle, I have taken the range request
support into consideration and got it work. The problem is that current media
element implementation does not route through ResourceHandle.
However, introducing a
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher написал(а):
I think it makes sense to extend ResourceHandle.cpp to access the
BlobRegistry singleton in order to support blob URLs.
The problem I see with adding blob support to ResourceHandle is that it makes
it too difficult to maintain. It used to be a
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher написал(а):
I think it makes sense to extend ResourceHandle.cpp to access the
BlobRegistry singleton in order to support blob URLs.
The problem I see with adding blob support to
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher написал(а):
I think it makes sense to extend ResourceHandle.cpp to access the
BlobRegistry singleton in order to support blob
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.orgwrote:
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher написал(а):
I think it makes sense to extend
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.orgwrote:
14.09.2010, в
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.orgwrote:
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher написал(а):
I think it makes sense to extend ResourceHandle.cpp to access the
BlobRegistry singleton in
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm ignoring javascript: URLs because they are super weird... evaluation
happens synchronously and can have side effects such as causing other
navigations. It does not fit the normal mold of URL loading. Mozilla tries
to
On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
14.09.2010, в 22:15, Darin Fisher
On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm ignoring javascript: URLs because they are super weird... evaluation
happens synchronously and can have side effects such as causing other
navigations. It does not fit
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexey
When I implemented the blob scheme handling, I intentionally tried to have
some common implementation that could be used by all applicable platforms.
But it seems that introducing BlobResourceHandle derived from ResourceHandle
might not be a good hook up point because ResourceHandle is only a
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
Adam
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
When I implemented the blob scheme handling, I intentionally tried to have
some common implementation that could be used
I think it is a good idea but it will involve lots of work to figure out how
to build and test such module that could be used by all the ports. My
concern is that I do not have enough resource to speak of for all other
ports. Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
I don't think this is a good idea. This re-usable module would only be
used by the Safari WebKit port. As I understand it,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
I don't think this is a good idea. This re-usable
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
I
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:56 PM, David Levin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
I don't think this is a good idea. This re-usable module would only be
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:56 PM, David Levin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
What do you think of the idea of having a re-useable BlobCore module
that all the ports can share?
I
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
In some sense, this is analogous to adding an HTTPResourceHandle and
implementing the HTTP protocol inside of WebCore. While its true that
most (all?) users of
One thing that Maciej suggested in #webkit was to interpose in the
same way that appcache interposes. One advantage of that approach is
economy of mechanism.
(By the way, roundtrips to WebCore are cheap for the WebKit layer;
there isn't much reason to avoid them.)
Adam
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at
I think it makes sense to extend ResourceHandle.cpp to access the
BlobRegistry singleton in order to support blob URLs. This will work for
all ports that use ResourceHandle.cpp (everyone except Chromium AFAIK). I
don't think we need to overabstract this.
When designing this system, we took a
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
One thing that Maciej suggested in #webkit was to interpose in the
same way that appcache interposes. One advantage of that approach is
economy of mechanism.
I think we have mostly done this. See BlobRegistry.
(By
24 matches
Mail list logo
