On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
Bradley Nelson:
1. Ability to incrementally transition
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer
par...@paroga.com wrote:
Bradley Nelson:
1. Ability to incrementally transition on Windows. It took us about 6
months to switch fully to gyp. Previous
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:54:02 -0700, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
Indeed. It also allows features like Ctrl+F7 (compile only the current
source file) to work. A number of other common IDE features are lost if
you
use a makefile based vcproj. GYP nicely preserves all of those great
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer par...@paroga.com
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:54:02 -0700, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
Indeed. It also allows features like Ctrl+F7 (compile only the current
source file) to work. A number of other common IDE features
2010/4/20 par...@paroga.com
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:53:55 -0700, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
AIUI, readability isn't the issue, it's the ability for e.g. Visual
Studio
to correctly understand dependencies itself so that incremental builds
from
inside the IDE (which is where
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:36:17 -0400, Marc-Antoine Ruel
mar...@chromium.org wrote:
Are the sources under an open source license? I'd like to take a look if
so.
I'm sorry, they are closed source. :-(
But I have working CMake files for JSC on Windows already.
I'd like to clean them up an try to
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Roland Gansterer par...@paroga.com
wrote:
Bradley Nelson:
1. Ability to incrementally transition on Windows. It took us about 6
months to switch fully to gyp. Previous attempts to move to scons had
taken a long time and failed, due to the
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:53:55 -0700, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
AIUI, readability isn't the issue, it's the ability for e.g. Visual
Studio
to correctly understand dependencies itself so that incremental builds
from
inside the IDE (which is where most Windows Chromium developers do
Here's the innards of an email with a laundry list of stuff I came up with a
while back on the gyp-developers list in response to Mike Craddick regarding
what motivated gyp's development, since we were aware of cmake at the time
(we'd even started a speculative port):
I did an exploratory port
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.comwrote:
Here's the innards of an email with a laundry list of stuff I came up with
a while back on the gyp-developers list in response to Mike Craddick
regarding what motivated gyp's development, since we were aware of cmake
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:10:25 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Hi,
Adam Treat (tr...@kde.org) suggested that I join this list to talk about
CMake as an option for a unified cross platform build solution. My name
is Bill Hoffman. I am the lead CMake developer. My company Kitware
created and
I don't see this as a decision needing pre-approval.
This is a decision needing code. No one has tried to make Mac, Win,
or other ports use a common system yet. Obviously converting them in
the end requires buy-in from those ports. But producing a demo
doesn't/shouldn't.
I eventually plan to
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk/CMakeLists.txt?rev=17853
Cheers,
Adam
On Friday 16 April 2010 05:34:45 pm Eric Seidel wrote:
I don't see this
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it
easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
http://trac.webkit.org/log/trunk/CMakeLists.txt?rev=17853
Can CMake generate native Xcode
On Friday 16 April 2010 06:21:39 pm Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Adam Treat wrote:
Sure. Having Bill's and Kitware's help will hopefully make it
easier to
produce such a demo using CMake. I pledge to help.
We can start with this:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific reason
that they ruled out CMake as an option. (I have heard that it was considered
and rejected.)
CCing a couple people involved if they wish to
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific reason
that they ruled out CMake as an option. (I have heard that it was
On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
I'm curious if the Chromium folks who created Gyp had any specific
reason
that they ruled
This is from an earlier thread on this issue on webkit-dev:
We also considered CMake, and had it demonstrably working for some of
our smaller projects as well. Unfortunately, transitioning to CMake
would have required moving everything over at once, without allowing
for some existing projects
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
FWIW, I don't have CMake installed, and I have everything a typical Apple
developer would have and then some. I'm running SnowLeopard and the latest
Xcode. CMake is also not installed by default on Windows and I am not
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Nico Weber tha...@chromium.org wrote:
This is from an earlier thread on this issue on webkit-dev:
We also considered CMake, and had it demonstrably working for some of
our smaller projects as well. Unfortunately, transitioning to CMake
would have required
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:58:17 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Also: how hard is the dependency on being installed? Is this a solvable
problem if it turns out to be a showstopper for some folks?
It has to be installed, if this is a show stopper, then it is a show
stopper.
To be clear, it just
Thanks Nico for digging up the archive.
As I said in the other thread, the people at the session mostly looked about
reducing the number of build system, not forcing anyone to use any tool. If
some teams wants to switch to CMake, prefect as long as the number of build
tool reduces. Nobody seemed
We can make binaries available through a convenient download script
(possibly one that gets a source drop and builds it) if we have to. In fact,
when WebKit first switched to Subversion, for a while you had to get your
own copy to even check out the tree.
Sounds good.
All I'm saying is
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2010 09:58:17 pm Bill Hoffman wrote:
Also: how hard is the dependency on being installed? Is this a solvable
problem if it turns out to be a showstopper for some folks?
It has to be installed, if this is a
On Apr 16, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
wrote:
Thanks Nico for digging up the archive.
As I said in the other thread, the people at the session mostly
looked about
reducing the number of build system, not
Calling cmake during the build would likely be a showstopper for the Mac
port. As far as I know, Apple's build farm does not have CMake installed (at
least not on older build trains). And it's not easy to convince the build
engineers to install custom build tools.
I am told they have it now
27 matches
Mail list logo
