Hey all,
I just wanted to say a big thank you for all that you have done in creating
such an awesome rendering engine. Our new browser was made possible because
of WebKit, and I hope that when people talk about Chrome that they
understand that WebKit is at the heart of it.
So, I just put up a
[resent from an address mailman knows about]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 24, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Amanda Walker wrote:
Hello all,
A conversation started on https
[resent, doh... that's it, i'm registering my other email address]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 24, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Amanda Walker wrote:
The renderer process
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
2) Consider making WebKit's default minimum timer limit lower - something
like
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:24 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
I can appreciate that you aren't interested in revisiting this problem
after having resolved it finally by adding
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Brett Wilson wrote:
About a year ago, Google released the Google URL Parsing and
Canonicalization Library (Google-URL) as a separate open-source
project:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Geoffrey Garen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I'd like to highlight: It is a requirement for Chromium to use
consistent URL parsing throughout the entire application.
Can you explain this requirement more?
I think that's an important data point, since
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I have mentioned optionally replacing KURL with an ifdef to a number
of WebKit members. The reception has been tentatively yes.
As one of the people who were asked
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:43 PM, David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:27 PM, David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I have mentioned optionally replacing KURL
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Geoffrey Garen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KURL depends on WebCore types, and was
found to have bugs, so Brett did a study of other URL parsers and
wrote the Google URL library as a template library (and wrote GURL as
an example class using it with std::string).
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Ojan Vafai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Aaron Boodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really like the overengineered version. I like the fairly
minimalist
On a separate thread, it was discussed that it is useful to support
microsecond resolution for future proofness.
-Darin
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Timothy Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Why double delayInSeconds and not milliseconds to stay consistent?
On Oct 2, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Ojan
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
The prospect of WTF types in general tends to make me leery, since using
one can bring in dependencies on others, and we wouldn't want to bring more
dependencies than
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:24 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Oct 1, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Darin Fisher
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
In short, our architecture makes me
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 3, 2008, at 9:17 PM, David Hyatt wrote:
After working for a while on the WebCore/platform/ directory, it's
become clear that people don't really know what this directory is
supposed to contain (and by
As some of you may have noticed, there is now a PLATFORM(CHROMIUM) define
that is being used in WebKit. I thought it might be helpful to describe
what it is and explain why it exists.
PLATFORM(CHROMIUM) corresponds to the WebKit porting layer implementation
used by the Chromium (aka Google
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, David Kilzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10/30/08, zaheer ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iam working on implementing save page functionality. Looks
like its not
already supported in the core.
Apple's Mac port saves .webarchive files. The format is
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
We have code to support this feature
The http caching logic for chromium lives here:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/net/http/http_cache.cc?view=markup
WebKit does not have code for a network stack. Instead, each port provides
a network stack, typically by using a system library.
-Darin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:01
for it's
internal memory cache and will implement more. See
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17998 for details.
antti
2008/11/15 Darin Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The http caching logic for chromium lives here:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/net/http/http_cache.cc
2008/12/15 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
Dec 15, 2008, в 9:47 AM, David Levin написал(а):
This is how I plan to finish making XMLHttpRequest available for workers
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg7mj9sd_6dvthmdqj
Let me know if you have any comments.
As discussed earlier, this
Just speculating, but probably because there are cases where a QT API should
be used instead of a CF API. This probably just happens to be a time when
the CF API is preferred (maybe a QT alternative does not exist?).
(We are in a similar boat with PLATFORM(CHROMIUM), which is why this topic
is
I didn't have a specific example with CF in mind. Since the Mac port of
Chromium is sharing things like PLATFORM(CG), I can imagine there being
issues like this coming up.
-Darin
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Darin Fisher
Yup, that was my plan. Custom will be respected by both code generators.
-Darin
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote:
To minimize the span of the changes, let's keep Custom as well, which
in this context should mean -- Custom for all platforms. WDYT?
Victory!
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/waterfall?builder=Webkit%20(webkit.org)
To those not working on Chromium, that is our buildbot that builds Chromium
trunk against WebKit trunk. That implies zero forks, and to have it
green--and passing the same layout tests as our normal
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Darin Fisher da...@google.com wrote:
3- A WebKit layer API (this is brewing
herehttp://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/WebKit/WebKit/chromium/
in
case you want a sneak peak; it exists in our tree presently to ease the
transition from
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:45 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Mozilla restricts downloaded fonts to same-origin by default, with the
ability for the hosting site
While this is not a perfect solution, a common technique is to call (from
onload) a DOM method like offsetHeight that forces layout to run. That way
the bulk of the work required to paint is forced to happen before the
benchmark considers the page load complete.
-Darin
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at
Ditto. The last time I wondered about this, I grepped through the code and
found [1] to be the most prevalent. So, in code reviews I have been
recommending people do [1].
-Darin
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
If we're voting, then +1 to [1]. If
good revision* in its weakest meaning. If
curious, more info at
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/try-server-usage#TOC-LKGR
M-A
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
We are working on it. It is taking more time than we'd like :-(
For now, we only have
I noticed that some new form validation code is landing (e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/45739). That change adds stubs for the
ValidityState object. What I didn't see in that patch is any kind of ENABLE
flag. I suspect there should be one since otherwise it becomes difficult
for a web
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:57 AM, David Hyatt wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:40 AM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter Kasting
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:17 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
This small interval rule-of-thumb idea sounds pretty good, but I still
wish it didn't put the burden on the guy doing the branch to figure out what
is or isn't incomplete
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ollivier
kev...@theolliviers.comwrote:
Of course, the big question is if waf would have the same limitations as
SCons in regards to doing this, but I think it's at least worth
2009/7/22 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org
22.07.2009, в 16:41, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) написал(а):
Some web apps/widgets/browser extensions can also benefit from knowing
the ordered list of languages in Accept-Language.
I should note that Safari only sends one language. The reasons
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
22.07.2009, в 22:36, Darin Fisher написал(а):
Firefox and Chrome send very similar A-L headers. Given FF's marketshare,
I'm surprised you observed compat problems with doing the same. Was that a
recent
There is a Mac-only willCacheResponse notification that gets recorded by
several of the layout tests when
layoutTestController.dumpResourceLoadCallbacks(true) is called. However,
this notification which originates at the ResourceHandle level is currently
#if PLATFORM(MAC). I noticed that the
GCC will complain (maybe only a warning?) if C++ files don't end in a
newline.-Darin
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Gavin Barraclough barraclo...@apple.comwrote:
I believe the C spec requires that files end in a newline, though I
couldn't comment on the c++ spec. Possibly redundant to list
Perhaps... any suggestions?-Darin
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Maybe it's worth distinguishing these settings with some sort of
naming convention so that embedders know they'll be removed at some
point?
Adam
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Darin
Given shared workers (and indeed Chromium's out-of-process dedicated
workers), it seems like we also have cross process boundaries to consider.
-Darin
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Chris Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
I had
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Chris Campbell wrote:
Hi All,
I had it in mind to implement support for passing data structures
through postMessage() using the structured clone algorithm laid out
in the HTML5 spec:
I'm very confused by this change. If a page has an unload handler, then
Firefox does not put the page in the bfcache. So the author of a page that
has an unload handler would have no reason to include a pagehide handler.
Does this change mean that unload handlers are never run? Or, are they run
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:58 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
Either way though, I don't think it'll work in this case. I've seen pages
have 8 beforeunload/unload handlers each sleeping for 200ms, just so that
they don't
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 1:58 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
Either way though, I don't think
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
Counting work instead of time is much
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:47 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
By the way, to be clear these ads aren't on the critical path for link
clicks. A navigation occurs, and the ad just observes unload. During
unload it presumably
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
For a ping to be used as I suggested, you would need to set the href to
a javascript URL such as javascript:void(), so that it would not interfere
with an existing
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
For a ping to be used as I suggested
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:28 AM
roll out these changes if they cannot be fixed in a
timely manner.
-Sam
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
As is described in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28941, for
the Chromium project, we like to make incomplete features available
behind
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
I'm surprised to see these objections coming up now, weeks after the
original discussion, and only
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Sam Weinig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Drew Wilson
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2009-10-05, at 21:48, Darin Fisher wrote:
It is a matter of our process that we do not change the configuration when
promoting builds. The bits that passed the test get promoted.
I'm happy to absorb this cost in the V8
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2009-10-05, at 21:48, Darin Fisher wrote:
It is a matter of our process that we do not change the configuration
when promoting builds. The bits
that it will be tested as it is brought up.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27206
Is is ok to turn off by default from this point of view?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2009-10-05, at 21:48
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Dmitry Titov dim...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Sam Weinig sam.wei...@gmail.com wrote:
I would still very much like a good solution to runtime enabling/disabling
features in the bindings as I think this would be a useful addition to the
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:43 PM, John Abd-El-Malek wrote:
To resurrect this thread. I'm looking in implementing some of the methods
that we discussed so that web developers have no excuse in simulating sleeps
in unload
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:50 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@google.com wrote:
Does this argue for making the image loading trick work all the time from
JS, not just from unload handlers? I tested with IE and it looks like
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, David Hyatt hy...@apple.com wrote:
You aren't only selecting text on a page though. For example, copying can
be of all the HTML content. This includes tables, images, plugins, etc.
If
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think there is a good use case for copying a selection of HTML from any
web page and pasting that into the rich text editor of a web mail program
The Chromium port of WebKit already acts very much like a headless build of
WebKit owing to the Chromium sandbox, which denies the WebKit process access
to most features of the system, including the GUI system.
The interface lives here:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKit/chromium
Why are some layout tests renamed with a suffix of -disabled? Why aren't
such tests simply added to the skipped list? Is -disabled simply the old
way?
-Darin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Dan Bernstein m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Dan Bernstein m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
Why are some layout tests renamed with a suffix
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 14:05, Dmitry Titov wrote:
That also pretty much means if we won't have SharedScript, we'll need to
explore other opportunities toward efficient sharing of code and data which
does not make people
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
In Chrome, a SharedWorker is reachable from any WebKit process, whereas a
SharedScript would only be reachable within a WebKit process. This is an
interesting distinction, and I can imagine some use cases for SharedWorker
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Just a note:
In Chrome, a SharedWorker is reachable from any WebKit process, whereas a
SharedScript would only be reachable within a WebKit process. This is an
interesting distinction, and I can imagine some use
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:43 PM, Dmitry Titov wrote:
I don't think it's correct to say that SharedWorkers are not useful and we
need a SharedScript instead. They are different things and can address
different use cases. For
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Charles Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
It is wrong to design an API based on architectural decisions of your
existing browser -- you should be making decisions based on what the
developers
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
Following up, I think this highlights the distinct set of use cases that
shared workers and shared script address:
SharedWorkers are a great platform for when you have a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:31 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
Following up, I think this highlights
shared script context.
and, possibly: add a list (regexp?) to App Cache manifest to describe the
set of URLs loaded into the same process to make them able to find each
other without relying on window.open().
Yes.
-Darin
Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Darin Fisher da
perhaps the crawlers put too much load on trac?
-darin
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
It's bothered me for a while that I can't just type trac webkit
Document.cpp into Google and have it give me a trac link to our
Document.cpp page.
+1
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
Curious if we've ever tossed around the idea of setting up an lxr for
webkit?
Maybe the functionality of being able to click on a function name and have
it jump to the definition already exists somewhere on the web for
This would probably be a performance win since it would reduce the amount of
disk i/o.
(Note, it doesn't mean that 5 million characters could be stored since a
UTF-8 character might be multi-byte.)
-Darin
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com wrote:
Could WebKit
2, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
This would probably be a performance win since it would reduce the
amount of disk i/o.
(Note, it doesn't mean that 5 million characters could be stored since a
UTF-8 character might be multi-byte.)
Currently the database can store invalid UTF-16
What about Maciej's comment. JS strings are often use to store binary
values. Obviously, if people stick to octets, then it should be fine, but
perhaps some folks leverage all 16 bits?
-Darin
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Michael Nordman
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
What about Maciej's comment. JS strings are often use to store binary
values. Obviously, if people stick to octets, then it should be fine, but
perhaps some folks
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
What about Maciej's comment. JS strings
Ditto.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Kenneth Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@openbossa.org wrote:
I'm OK with both. Peter's is my preferred solution, though.
Kenneth
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
+1. Peter's is better than Maciej's is
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Adam Treat tr...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 04 December 2009 12:17:03 pm Jeremy Orlow wrote:
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your conclusion, but I have to ask:
can you think of an example of a style change that isn't subjective
and/or
something that can
Sounds right to me since it mirrors the solution used to enable XHR from
workers.
-Darin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.orgwrote:
Right now, WebSocket uses WebSocketChannel and SocketStreamHandle directly,
but this might not work well if the WebSocket is
I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to
support it, we'd probably have to say that removeChild of an IFRAME element
doesn't cause the unload event to be dispatched. (I'm a bit concerned that
that may cause incompatibilities with existing pages.) Then, you'd have
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think that use case has been de-emphasized. However, if we wanted to
support it, we'd probably have to say that removeChild of an IFRAME
I noticed recently that the style bot started complaining about header files
ending with #endif instead of #endif // Foo_h. I was surprised by this
since the style guide does not require it.
Should the style guide be changed to require this comment, or should the
style bot be taught to ignore
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 6, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Dumitru Daniliuc wrote:
while doing a security review of chromium's implementation of HTML5 DBs,
chris noted that some sqlite functions are potential security risks. thus,
we would like to
Chromium actually does something like this. See ChromeClientChromium.
In our case, we have two modes: one where the embedder just has to wrap the
given PopupContainer with a window frame, and in another mode, where the
embedder is responsible for drawing the popup menu.
We are forced to
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Do we really need a separate set of bots for pixel tests? Lets just turn
the pixel tests on for the current bots. The only thing stopping us doing
that is the currently failing tests, hence the suggestion for adding an
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Current check-webkit-style and the style bot complain if code uses
identifiers with underscores in their names. It turns out our code
does this fairly
Since the existing APIs haven't been around for very long, we should
probably just remove them. Any app using them is likely already on the
bleeding edge, and was probably developed recently enough that the
developers are still around and will be able to cope.
-Darin
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Alois Reitbauer
alois.reitba...@dynatrace.com wrote:
As discussed with Richard and Zhiheng here the feedback on the proposal by
dynaTrace software. We had a look at the new spec draft and have a number of
questions and proposals:
-In the
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Stephan Assmus supersti...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know whether it's ok to adopt the respective platform's
coding style in the WebKit API that a port exposes. I am working on the
Haiku port and saw that other ports do this, but I thought I'd better
The first step is probably to get the infrastructure in place so that new
tests can be
written as ref tests when possible.
-Darin
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
I agree. We should organize cross-browser-test-fest and pick each
other's brains.
This is not surprising to me at all. The problem is even more complicated
when you consider window.showModalDialog.
I recently changed Chromium to suppress WebKit's shared timer during calls
to alert, confirm, prompt, and the beforeunload prompt. That may be why you
aren't seeing the problem
As I understand it, the single repository is important for allowing
developers to atomically commit a patch that includes both a code fix, a
corresponding test, and expected results for that test.
-Darin
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org wrote:
Also, one
Also, note that in Chromium, the expected results for layout tests are not
in a separate deps/ dir :-)
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/webkit/data/layout_tests/platform/
-Darin
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Before you commit it:
platform/chromium/test_expectations.txt contains bug references to crbug.com.
I presume that newly filed bugs will be in bugs.webkit.org instead.
Unfortunately, it is going to be a bit hard to tell the difference given
only the bug number. Is there a system we should use to annotate the
This is how we are designing the Pepper API [1] by the way. It is designed
to be layered in order to support an optional, out-of-process
implementation.
I've always been interested in a similar model for WebKit.
-Darin
[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Plugins:PlatformIndependentNPAPI
On Fri, Apr
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
