Over the past few weeks I’ve spent a considerable amount of time reviewing
and correcting a number of problems with the Windows testing infrastructure.
We were skipping thousands of tests, including Accessibility, http tests,
and large sections of forms, css, and svg tests. Some tests were
I found
http://herbsutter.com/2013/08/12/gotw-94-solution-aaa-style-almost-always-auto/
very persuasive in my thinking about when to use auto.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
I was having a look at our Context Menu design when this USE flag got
my attention. Can someone help me clarify the motivation for it?
The motivation is explained pretty well in the ChangeLog for r73802,
which introduced this flag. I'll try to give a little explanation here
too.
(For current svn users I assume using svn would become effectively
impossible; the only tool I could find to do this is server-side and
essentially maintains git and svn repositories in parallel.)
FYI, any Git repository on GitHub also functions as a Subversion repository:
$ svn checkout
I'm pretty sure r142864 fixed this (perhaps unintentionally) by
changing all line endings in DumpRenderTree.sln from CRLF to LF.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
Typically in Subversion the fix for a problem like this is to set the
eol-style explicitly;
Could someone please add EditBug permission to my bugs.webkit.org
(http://bugs.webkit.org/) account?
Done.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann
simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
Hi WebKit,
I've been using a fork of the following repo:
https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
However, yesterday there was discussion on #webkit that
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Adam Roben aro...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann
simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
Hi WebKit,
I've been using a fork of the following repo:
https://github.com/WebKit
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls jar...@webkit.org wrote:
(from correct address)
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jarred Nicholls jar...@sencha.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Hausmann
simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Can we do some Bugzilla integration as Jarred suggested?
If you're excited about using GitHub, you should feel free to do that work.
It sounds like
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø
tor.arne.ves...@nokia.com wrote:
On 18.04.12 17:02, Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 06:53:46 AM ext Shezan Baig wrote:
Hi WebKit,
I've been using a fork of the following repo:
https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
However,
On Dec 20, 2011, at 7:23 AM, huangxueqing wrote:
As guys know, there two implement of plug-in in webkit, the first is located
in WebKit/WebProcess/plugins and another in WebCore/plugins, safari5 use
former and Chromium implement plug-in in separate process in
webkit/support/glue/plugins.
On Dec 2, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
The SnowLeopard bot went from a 1 hr 4 min (!?!) cycle time, to 38 min (still
!?!).
I suspect our Mac test bots could use a dose of RAM. Many of them only have
3GB, since when you're running tests one by one you don't really need much more.
On Nov 30, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Philippe Normand wrote:
Can we get new buildbot credentials for the new slave or can we reuse
the 32-bits Debug ones? It'd be great if we can coordinate on this
migration soon :)
Credentials are a slave name/password pair. If you're using the old slave name
for
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Hongbo Min wrote:
Failed to assign bug to you (can't find assigned_to) control.
Do you have EditBugs privileges at bugs.webkit.org?
https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=permissions
If not, you should email webkit-committ...@lists.webkit.org or ask in
On Nov 26, 2011, at 3:34 AM, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
Good morning WebKit folks,
I'm looking at build.webkit.org/waterfall, and see several bots which are
idle, but still report building 1min pretending they would do something.
Does any of our build.webkit.org masters know the cause of
On Nov 18, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Michael Saboff wrote:
Although the UChar* characters() method for the various string classes still
works, all new code should check what flavor a string is constructed by
using the new is8Bit() method on the various string classes. After
determining the
Hi all-
Darin Adler's been helping me sift through the leaks we're seeing on the Lion
Intel Leaks bot. (You can see the results of a recent run here:
http://build.webkit.org/LeaksViewer/?url=%2Fresults%2FLion%20Intel%20Leaks%2Fr100768%20%28193%29%2F.)
We could use some expert advice for two of
On Oct 21, 2011, at 7:33 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
The WK2 bot looks stable (possibly more stable than before) after the
NRWT switchover:
http://build.webkit.org/results/SnowLeopard%20Intel%20Release%20(WebKit2%20Tests)/r98091%20(15558)/results.html
Awesome!
I'll work on switching the --leaks
On Oct 21, 2011, at 9:41 AM, SravanKumar Sandela wrote:
Can you please inform us, what are the major difference between NRWT and
ORWT. I think it would of lot help for people like me who worked on ORWT long
back and now to catch up with NRWT.
This page gives a good explanation:
On Oct 19, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Also... VC++'s debugger happens to have some issues around unnamed
namespaces:
On Oct 12, 2011, at 3:15 AM, just2 contribute wrote:
Has anybody tried building the latest webkit-trunk for Safari on windows?
I am getting some build errors while building WebCore :)
Can anybody share the latest working SVN Revision Number that I can try?
On Oct 3, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
But a while back, Maciej outlined a concept for where to put these platform
base include files; I don’t remember when that was or what the details were.
I think the plan is outlined here:
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/Porting%20Macros%20plan.
On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Fady Samuel wrote:
pageScaleFactor is a document level CSS scaling style. Often times, we'd like
to be able to apply style at the document level when writing layout tests. As
far as I'm aware, there's no way to do this in javascript in a layout test?
Is this
This isn't the right mailing list for a question like this.
http://www.webkit.org/contact.html explains the different mailing lists.
But probably the best thing to do in a case like this is to file a bug at
http://webkit.org/new-bug.
-Adam
___
On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:36 AM, vswap 65 wrote:
After little more investigation I found that the issue is with the mimetype
not with the flash plugin.
When the NP flash plugini.e., npswf.dll is installed, webkit is loading the
dll and playing the flash with if the mimetype is changed to
On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Leandro Pereira wrote:
Antonio,
On 09/13/2011 04:00 PM, Antonio Gomes wrote:
I believe it was maintained by Torch Mobile, and, according to George
Staikos, it is not part of the plans any more (Torch was acquired by RIM).
AFAIR, Patrick Gansterer
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I'm happy to write a run-all-tests script which runs all known tests that
platform can handle. :)
I think run-webkit-tests
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I'm happy to write a run-all-tests script which runs all known tests
On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
We could also teach DumpRenderTree to lie about what / is, so we
could include the scripts like this:
script href=/fast/js/resources/js-test-pre.js
By the time DRT sees that URL it will already have been resolved against the
base URL of the
On Sep 8, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
I'm curious how other developers search the WebKit code?
I use http://codesearch.google.com/#search/q=package:webkit from time
to time. If others do too, we should make it a redirect from
cs.webkit.org (like we do for cia.webkit.org).
Or
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Eventually we might transition the cygwin port to Apache2
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22517 discusses this a little bit.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I do think that given the tools behavior you described, we should move the
reviewer text after the bug title and patch description paragraph, even
though you explicitly said that’s not what you
I've been working a bit more on TestFailures over the last few weeks, and it's
grown a few new features [1]. I encourage you to check it out if you haven't,
and even if you have!
http://build.webkit.org/TestFailures/
-Adam
1. Including:
* Basic support for detecting flaky tests
* Basic
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:55 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
One of the Leopard Debug slaves (apple-mac-pro-6) is still wedged
after the transition:
http://build.webkit.org/builders/Leopard%20Intel%20Debug%20%28Tests%29/builds/32142/steps/layout-test/logs/stdio
If someone could run killall httpd, or just
Now that more and more ports are switching to NRWT, it would be great for
someone to explain what the best practices are for dealing with failing and
flaky tests.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Adam Roben wrote:
Now that more and more ports are switching to NRWT, it would be great for
someone to explain what the best practices are for dealing with failing and
flaky tests.
Two specific questions I have:
1) Are the ports that have switched to NRWT
On Jul 6, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
I'm not sure we've quite figured that out yet. NRWT supports both
Skipped lists and test_expectations.txt, which is a more expressive
(but also more complex) version of Skipped lists. IMHO, we should
wait for the dust to settle on the
On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
Can we clean this up?
Definitely! It's easy to change the options for these two fields. I don't know
what would be involved with replacing these two fields with something else
entirely.
Do you have a proposal?
-Adam
On Jun 30, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I don’t think it’s a good idea to add yet another thing to every change log
entry.
I wouldn't consider this something being added. Most ChangeLog entries (the
good ones, anyway) already contain a description of the fix in addition to the
bug
On Jul 1, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Julien Chaffraix wrote:
I don’t think it’s a good idea to add yet another thing to every change log
entry.
I wouldn't consider this something being added. Most ChangeLog entries (the
good ones, anyway) already contain a description of the fix in addition to
When a test starts failing on a bot that uses old-run-webkit-tests, we
typically check in expected failure results for that test (e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/90235). That way we can find out if the
test's behavior changes in the future even though the test is still failing.
This is
When a test starts failing on a bot that uses old-run-webkit-tests, we
typically check in expected failure results for that test (e.g.,
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/90235). That way we can find out if the
test's behavior changes in the future even though the test is still failing.
This is
.), and work much better when that is the case.
Since our commit messages are almost always just a copy of our ChangeLog
entries, this should apply to ChangeLog entries too. Specifically, I suggest
one line be added to our ChangeLog template, yielding the following:
2011-06-30 Adam Roben aro
On Jun 30, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Mark Rowe wrote:
Most ChangeLog entries already have a one-line summary immediately after the
Reviewed by line. I'm not sure that there's any benefit to reordering
these parts of the ChangeLog.
Most ChangeLog entries have the bug title after the Reviewed by
On Jun 30, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
Sounds good to me, except I wonder how often you'd get Fixed bug
where where XXX is the bug summary.
I think this is something that reviewers would have to encourage authors not to
do, just like reviewers should be encouraging authors to
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:55 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
This should go into a bug.
Agreed.
On Jun 26, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
While investigating a separate issue, I noticed that I was hitting an
assertion in the Cairo drawing layer because it was attempting to use an
invalid
http://webkit.org/b/61059 is about.
-Adam
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
Hi all-
Before I go on vacation for 2.5 weeks, I wanted to let you know about a new
page I've been working on on build.webkit.org. You can see it here:
http://build.webkit.org
On Jun 1, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Brian Stuart wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build a fork of WebKit on windows that requires a version of
WebKitSupportLibrary.zip different than the one currently available from
http://developer.apple.com/opensource/internet/webkit_sptlib_agree.html
In the
and
WebKitSupportLibrary.zip. Hopefully it will work with your old version of
WebKit without requiring too many changes.
-Adam
On Jun 20, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Brian Stuart wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build a fork of WebKit on windows that requires
Hi all-
Before I go on vacation for 2.5 weeks, I wanted to let you know about
a new page I've been working on on build.webkit.org. You can see it
here:
http://build.webkit.org/TestFailures/
The idea of the page is to provide a single place to go to find out
what tests are failing on the
On May 2, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
MHTML support was definitely discussed at length back in the early
days of Safari Windows development in webkit.org. Maybe that desire
has gone away since then. I feel very out-of-touch with current
Safari-on-Windows needs.
We've had requests
On May 4, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
I wish I could make script tests that didn't output PASS/FAIL
What's stopping you?
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On May 3, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
The results load considerably faster now. For runs where many tests fail, the
filesize is considerably smaller than the old-run-webkit-tests filesize.
Also, I've added in the image toggling behavior of old-run-webkit-tests and
made the
On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:30 PM, David Kilzer wrote:
On Apr 25, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Stephanie Lewis wrote:
One point brought up during the compile time discussion today was that if
you pulled once a day, you were likely to have rebuild the world. I thought
it would be interesting to see which
On Apr 21, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I think it's just been especially bad the last few days.
I believe this is because Tony Chang has been working on converting existing
pixel results to have embedded checksums, rather than out-of-line .checksum
files. This is a one-time
Hi Bill-
bugs.webkit.org, svn.webkit.org, www.webkit.org, trac.webkit.org all seem to be
down. Is this expected? Any idea when they might return? Thanks!
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Pere Martir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
The best way to report a bug like this is to file a new bug at
http://webkit.org/new-bug. In this case, this is a known issue
(http://webkit.org/b/52913), so you don't need
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Pere Martir wrote:
I am working on Windows and I am planning to submit some patches
(plugin loading) but I have problem make all regression tests
(run-webkit-tests) pass without unmodified code.
I followed all the instructions:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Pere Martir wrote:
64-bit Window 7.
run-webkit-tests reported that many tests crashed, in addition to many
other failures due to the metric difference.
Command line:
Tools/Scripts/run-webkit-tests compositing/iframes
Tests that caused DumpRenderTree tool
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Pere Martir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
The best way to report a bug like this is to file a new bug at
http://webkit.org/new-bug. In this case, this is a known issue
(http://webkit.org/b/52913), so you don't need
On Apr 2, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Can we show the list of failing layout tests in buildbot's waterfall
display so we don't have to click through to the results.html file?
Also, can we change
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
I know that Adam Barth was the driving force behind this, since it was his
turn at gardening WebKit (that's a Chromium thing
http://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/webkit-merge-1). I wonder if we as
a community would benefit from a
Major kudos to Adam (Barth) for all his gardening efforts this week! (Somehow
this slipped out of my previous message.)
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Mar 25, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
UA String Changes On WebKit Trunk
Posted by Peter Kasting on Friday, March 25th, 2011 at 10:44 am
Recently some changes to the UA string (tracked by
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54556) have landed. These changes
are designed to
Hi all-
Over the last two weeks I've been working on a new tool for viewing
leaks output from the SnowLeopard Intel Leaks bot. You can see it
here: http://build.webkit.org/LeaksViewer/ (screenshot
below). It uses the Inspector's Profiles panel code to present leak
On 3/16/2011 11:36 PM, Brent Fulgham wrote:
Can build-bot be trained to grab that file from another directory?
Yes. Set the WEBKITSUPPORTLIBRARIESZIPDIR environment variable to a
Windows-style absolute path pointing to the directory that contains
WebKitSupportLibrary.zip.
-Adam
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-10, at 12:27, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Mark Rowe mr...@apple.com wrote:
On 2011-03-10, at 12:08, David Levin wrote:
tL;dr Why isn't there a
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
I'm also planning to file a bug about CoreText-related leaks beneath
GlyphPage::fill.
http://webkit.org/b/56136 CoreText-related leaks seen beneath
GlyphPage::fill
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing
All committers are encouraged to follow the instructions I just added to
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/CommitterTips#Walkingyouthroughyourfirstcommit:
Subversion has a handy feature called auto-props that will ensure that new
binary files you add to the repository are given the correct MIME
On Mar 3, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
Can the style bot be made aware of .png at least and complain if you don't
set the right flags?
Subversion properties aren't captured in patches, so the style bot is too early
in the process. We could add a pre-commit hook to check for the
On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I just realized that there's a new field labelled Alias on
https://bugs.webkit.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebKit
Why is this field added and what should I put in this field?
The Alias field allows a bug to be referred to by something other
Hi all-
All of Apple's Mac and Windows test bots should now be uploading crash logs to
build.webkit.org [1]. The crash logs are linked to from results.html (e.g.,
http://build.webkit.org/results/Windows%20XP%20Debug%20(Tests)/r80125%20(25890)/results.html).
If you see a crash on one of Apple's
Hi all-
I'd like to understand better what the criteria are for a builder to become a
core builder.
We've been putting lot of effort into keeping the Windows testers green lately
(especially the Windows 7 Release (Tests) builder), and it seems like it would
be good for them to eventually join
On Mar 2, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Does this require special configuration on the bots, or should
run-webkit-tests be copying crash logs into layout-test-results for
all Snow Leopard machines?
run-webkit-tests should be copying crash logs into layout-test-results for all
Snow
they haven't been green in weeks (even though I'm sure we wish
it would be green).
The Leopard Debug bots are non-core now. The Release ones are still core for
the moment.
-Adam
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
Hi all-
I'd like to understand better what the criteria
On Mar 2, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
the EWS and commit-queue snow leopard machines do not
seem to be copying crash logs into layout-test-results like I would
expect:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51138
(each of those zips are made from /tmp/layout-test-results after the
Reducing the number of build systems is a face-meltingly worthy goal. I have
one small question:
On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
3) Remove the xcodeproj files from svn.webkit.org and integrate the
generation of xcodeproj files with the WebKit build / update scripts.
At this
On Feb 24, 2011, at 12:59 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
As far I as I can tell, Leopard Debug is not consistently green:
http://build.webkit.org/waterfall?show=Leopard%20Intel%20Debug%20(Build)
In fact, it's been failing to build much more often than not for an
extended period of time (i.e.,
On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
I realized that the build was 13 hours behind and wasn't making any progress
in compiling r79464 so I force stopped the build but then the slave got lost
along the way. In the retrospect, I should have been more careful. I
apologize for
On Feb 7, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Alejandro Garcia Castro wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:25:10PM -0500, Adam Roben wrote:
Hi all-
[...]
Please file any bugs you find with this feature on bugs.webkit.org,
and CC me. Please also file bugs for any ideas you have for making
this more useful
Hi all-
The results.html pages on build.webkit.org now make it much easier to triage
crashing tests on Mac and Windows XP (Windows Vista/7 are blocked by
http://webkit.org/b/44135). When a test crashes, you'll see something like
this on Mac:
fast/events/tabindex-focus-blur-all.html
On Feb 4, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
The new crash log link will take you to a textual crash log for that test.
And on Windows, the crashing line of code is even included in the log, like
this:
FAULTING_SOURCE_CODE:
105:
106: void Instance::willDestroyRuntimeObject
free to
file a bug!
-Adam
On 11-02-04 02:25 PM, Adam Roben wrote:
Hi all-
The results.html pages on build.webkit.org now make it much easier to triage
crashing tests on Mac and Windows XP (Windows Vista/7 are blocked by
http://webkit.org/b/44135). When a test crashes, you'll see something
This list is for discussion of the development of the WebKit project itself,
not questions about how to use WebKit (or a browser that uses WebKit, such as
Safari). See http://webkit.org/contact.html for details. You'll have better
luck asking in a Safari-specific venue, such as
Hi Bill-
svn.webkit.org is responding to pings, but svn up just hangs. And
nightly.webkit.org responds to pings, but never finishes loading when navigated
to in a browser. Is this expected? Do you know when they'll be available again?
Thanks!
-Adam
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:52 PM, William
. Patrick
Gansterer offered to code up a patch to build Apple's Windows port using the
existing CMake build system, which will be very interesting to see!
-Adam
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31
Hi all-
We'd like to switch Apple's Windows WebKit port to build with Visual Studio
2010 sometime in the next 6-8 months, and to drop support for building with
Visual Studio 2005 at the same time.
The biggest consequence of this will be that anyone wishing to build Apple's
Windows port will
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Adam Roben aro...@apple.com wrote:
Please let me (and the list) know if this change will cause you trouble, and
if there's something we can do to make the transition easier.
This may make life hard
On Dec 14, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Jake wrote:
Hello,
I've made some changes to the webkit trunk that allows me to build webkit
(more specifically QtWebkit) with Visual Studio 2010. I had to make several
changes to handle the ambiguous operator = error from NullPtr.h.
To get the build to
On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:13 AM, John Knottenbelt wrote:
I'm looking at adding a method on the LayoutTestController in DumpRenderTree
that will return a string. I see that some methods there return
JSRetainPtrJSStringRef and some just return JSStringRef.
Can anybody comment on when it is
On Dec 10, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Could we add a symlink before then?
That seems unlikely to work on Windows, though if the only processes that rely
on the symlink are Cygwin-based, maaybe it will.
-Adam
___
webkit-dev mailing
On Dec 1, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Martin Robinson wrote:
For some weeks now the GTK+ release bots have been missing results.
When you try to click on any result in results.html, there's an error
page. I'm not sure what the issue is, but the results upload output
looks quite sane:
On 11/16/2010 6:42 AM, Thomas Brodt wrote:
The buildbot for the wincairo port is running again, thanks to whoever
did repair it (Brent?).
But the build fails again, as before when it went offline.
There are errors installing the new WebKitSupportLibrary:
cp: cannot create regular file
On Oct 28, 2010, at 4:16 PM, software visualization wrote:
My issue is, no such path 9or similar) exists on my machine, that is
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2\Include\mfc
does not exist and
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server
Hi all-
WebKitAuxiliaryLibrary and WebKitSupportLibrary (two of the
prerequisites for building Apple's Windows port of WebKit) have been
updated recently. The former will be downloaded automatically when you
run update-webkit, but the latter will need to be downloaded manually.
You'll see
be affected. Hopefully
Brent Fulgham can update it soon.
-Adam
Am 20.10.2010 10:34, schrieb Adam Roben:
Hi all-
WebKitAuxiliaryLibrary and WebKitSupportLibrary (two of the
prerequisites for building Apple's Windows port of WebKit) have been
updated recently. The former will be downloaded
The Safari for Windows symbol server has been updated with symbols for all
releases through Safari 5.0.2.
You can find instructions for using the symbol server at
http://developer.apple.com/internet/safari/windows_symbols_agree.html.
-Adam
___
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
I really would like to be able to select some text and add a comment that
uses the selection as context, a single line of context is frequently
insufficient, this is about the only thing that still makes the new review
tool less effective
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
