On Oct 28, 2004, at 12:31 PM, lloyd wrote:
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently
seems to
have the time or inclination to do
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer
steps forward because none of the developers (myself included)
currently seems to have the time or inclination to do it.
what is required?
ps - is the
Hi Matt,
Thanks for taking the time and effort to reply (and quickly!) and for
your helpful comments. It is very useful to know that the reason that
there aren't many bug fixes is that there aren't many bugs.
Considering that there aren't many bugs and that it is stable, would
it be logical,
I'll add my 2cents because my useage perspective is slightly different
from most. I recently (2+ months ago) accepted my current position as
software architect and I kinda recieved ownership of a web architecture
that utilizes Webware. So I didn't get to really choose to use it.
However, I've
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I know
that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is not yet,
so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
I'm glad that you're
lloyd wrote:
i'm using webware in a project for the first time. maybe it's
irrational, but i feel more comfortable using a release than the latest
snapshot.
on the other hand, i'd like to explore the use of middlekit, but
postgresql support (which i need) is only in cvs.
I think MiddleKit
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
not yet, so I expect this explains the wait for v 1.0.
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
The time is way overdue for a new release from
the tip of CVS too, but that won't happen until a new volunteer steps
forward because none of the developers (myself included) currently seems to
have the time or inclination to do it.
what is required?
ps - is the traffic on
On Oct 28, 2004, at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Chas.
Perhaps the developers can chime in on the version numbering, but I'd
say that it may be this: although the framework is quite stable, I
know that there are some things that we all want it to be that it is
not yet,
Hi Chas.
I'm not one of the developers, but I've been using webkit nearly
exclusively for almost 3 years.
I think that part of the reason that there aren't many bug fixes is that
there aren't many bugs. The bugs that are found tend to be pretty
simple, and I've seen them get resolved quickly.
Matt Feifarek wrote:
I can't speak for the developers, but I know that Webware is in heavy
use by many people. We talk often on this list about getting new
release, but it never happens, mainly because the features/bugs have
reached a point of good stability, and it's just not crucial for
11 matches
Mail list logo
