Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
On Thursday 12 June 2003 06:16 am, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
This has bitten some people on this mailing list in the past because
of bugs in database adapters. And right now I'm trying to track down
a problem where I have a servlet that makes an HTTPS request to
another
On Thursday 12 June 2003 06:16 am, Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
This has bitten some people on this mailing list in the past because
of bugs in database adapters. And right now I'm trying to track down
a problem where I have a servlet that makes an HTTPS request to
another web site (using Python's
Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to see a standard container. I don't think it even
has to be terribly intrusive or conformist -- it just has to create
request and response objects, and map those to some resource, which
would be somewhat more abstract than
Hallo,
Chris Bruce hat gesagt: // Chris Bruce wrote:
Thanks for the info. If you have any additional suggestions or comments,
please let me know.
As far as security, is UserKit useable?
I found that the file(pickle)-based UserManager just doesn't work (for
me). The MiddleKit backend
Geoffrey Talvola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Webware used some sort of process pool instead of a
thread pool, and served only one request per process, this
wouldn't be as much of a problem.
It could be interesting to investigate the tantalising, but still apparently obscure,
POSH
Hancock, David (DHANCOCK) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that adopting a process-based architecture would reduce
performance considerably, but maybe there's some middle ground using FastCGI
or mod_python.
I suppose I should have said process pooling rather than
I think the process issue lies within the Webware application server, and
not the connection from Apache to Webware.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:17 AM
Subject: RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware (Not Really
I like webware becuase you can write all of the business logic as
normal python modules, test them outsite of a webserver w/ full
debugging, and then call it from a very small servlet. I hate debuggin
in a web server.
Here is an example of how I use Webware.
I need to pull data from
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Bicking [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm not exactly objective, but then while Webware is my
preference, Zope is my current reality in professional programming.
You're relatively lucky, then. The closest to job-related
right now, developing
the Zope-like things that make it easy to build web-apps in Zope as plug-ins
for Webware.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Ian Bicking
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Webware discuss
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 12:53 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
Also, because Webware doesn't publish everything, you can use Python
modules and objects that aren't Zope-aware. Zope makes this really
hard
-- like, for some reason a Postgres connection is returning an
mxDateTime (un-Zope-aware)
Ian writes:
Personally I detest XML files -- the beauty of OO is when data is not
exposed, just methods, and XML exposes data in an inflexible way. But
the interchangeability would be great.
At Autodesk, we had an object-oriented approach to XML for the
Streamline engineering collaboration
I truly believe that Python is probably the best web development language
around. I have actually been paid to develop with Java, ASP, PHP, and Perl
and none of them are the silver bullet, like python appears to be. But, I
am now trying to find a great framework to use on all future apps done in
Hallo,
Chris Bruce hat gesagt: // Chris Bruce wrote:
I am getting ready to build a large webbased application. I am set
on python (still wondering how to make installation easy) and am
deciding between Zope and Webware. I have developed many Zope
applications, but new to Webware.
Why not
Hi, Chris.
I muddle my way through both Zope and Webware almost daily. I'm neither
a novice nor an expert with either.
With mod_webkit, you get to take advantage of Apache's built-in
functionality. If mod_ssl is installed/configured, then secure stuff
dynamically generated through webkit is a
Thanks for the info. If you have any additional suggestions or comments,
please let me know.
As far as security, is UserKit useable?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Chris Bruce
To: Webware discuss
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: [Webware-discuss] Zope vs Webware
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 16:29, Chris Bruce wrote:
As far as security, is UserKit useable?
My experience, shared by a number of other people, is that UserKit
doesn't help with the interesting problems (like security,
authentication, etc), and isn't worth it for the conceptual overhead. I
read the
--- Chris Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting ready to build a large webbased application. I am set
on
python (still wondering how to make installation easy) and am
deciding
between Zope and Webware. I have developed many Zope applications,
but new
to Webware. I am well aware
18 matches
Mail list logo
