[°ø°³ °í¹ß]±¹Á¤¿ø ½ÅÆÇ! 'Á¦2¼öÁö±è' »ç°Ç!, °£Ã¸³¯Á¶-ÀºÆó ¹üÁËÀ» °í¹ßÇÕ´Ï´Ù!

2002-04-08 Thread ±èÇÊ¿ø
O º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´ÙO e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù [±¤°í-°ø°³°í¹ßÀå!] ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº Çü¹ý, ±¹°¡º¸¾È¹ý, ¾È±âºÎ¹ý, Æø·ÂÇàÀ§µîó¹ú¿¡°üÇѹý·ü µî°ú, Çü»ç¼Ò¼Û¹ý Á¦223Á¶,

getting time stamp via FTP

2002-04-08 Thread Urs Thuermann
Please CC: any answers to my email address, since I'm not on this list. I'd like wget to get the time stamp of a file that is downloaded via FTP and to set the mtime after writing the file to the local disk. When using HTTP, this already happens, i.e. when doing a wget http://host/file

³ëÆ®ºÏ/È­¸é100ÀÎÄ¡/·¹ÀÌÁ®±Þ¸Å È« ` º¸

2002-04-08 Thread ÃÖ¼±Èñ
È­¸é100ÀÎÄ¡ º®°ÉÀÌTV °¡³ª¿Â´Ù¸é(1¾ï¿ø)À» È£°¡ ÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¡¡ ºöÇÁ·ÎÁ§ÅÍ·Î TVº¸´Ù ¼±¸íÇÏ°í »ý»ýÇÑ1¾ï¿øÀÇ °¡Ä¡¸¦ Áñ°Ü º¸¼¼¿ä! ¡¡ È­¸é 100ÀÎÄ¡/200ÀÎÄ¡ (ºöÇÁ·ÎÁ§ÅÍ ±ÞóºÐ) ¡¡ ³ëÆ®ºÏ ¹× ·¹ÀÌÁ®´Â ¹«·á·Î µå¸®°Ú½À´Ï´Ù ¡¡ ÀÚ¼¼ÇÑ

Re: Satellite [NetGain 2000] [Corruption]

2002-04-08 Thread Justin Piszcz
If anyone creates a patch for rollback, I'll be your first tester ;) Justin Piszcz wrote: I was curious if lftp or wget will ever support a rollback feature and somehow verify the bytes are correct somehow where the file has been resumed. Why? This is stated below: LFTP VS WGET

Re: Can wget handle this scenario?

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Tomislav Goles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now I need to add the twist where username account info resides on another machine (i.e. machine2 which by the way is on the same network as machine1) So I need to do something like the following: $ wget ftp://username:[EMAIL

Re: wget reject lists

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
David McCabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am having a hell of a time to get the reg-ex stuff to work with the -A or -R options. If I supply this option to my wget command: -R 1* Everything works as expected. Same with this: -R 2* Now, if I do this: -R 1*,2* I get all the files

Re: Debian bug 32353 - opens a new connection for each ftpdocument.

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: if I use 'wget ftp://site.com/file1.txt ftp://site.com/file2.txt', wget will no reuse the ftp connection, but will open one for each document downloaded from the same site... Yes, that's how Wget currently behaves. But that's not a bug, or at least

Re: debian bug 32712 - wget -m sets atimet to remote mtime.

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Good point there. I wonder... is there a legitimate reason to require atime to be set to the mtime time? If not, we could just make the change without the new option. In general I'm careful not to add new options unless they're really necessary.

Re: Debian bug 55145 - wget gets confused by redirects

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If wget fetches a url which redirects to another host, wget retrieves the file, and there's nothing that can be done to turn that off. So, if you do wget -r on a machine that happens to have a redirect to www.yahoo.com you'll wind up trying to pull

Re: New suggestion.

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Ivan Buttinoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Again I send a suggestion, this time quite easy. I hope it's not allready implemented, else I'm sorry in advance. It will be nice if wget can use the regexp to evaluate what accept/refuse to download. The regexp have to work on whole URL and/or

Re: Debian bug 65791 - when converting links no effort is made tohandle the '?' character

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: For example if a link to the URL /foo?bar is seen then the correct file is downloaded and saved with the name foo?bar. When viewing the pages with Netscape the '?' character is seen to separate the URL and the arguments. This makes the link fail.

Re: CSS @import, NetBSD 1.5.2 ok

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Martin Tsachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it compiles on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.5.2 without any modifications I think that wget isn't parsing the @import CSS declaration, it should save those files when run with -p and convert the links if set so That is true. Parsing @import would require

Re: OK, time to moderate this list

2002-04-08 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: I was also thinking about checking for `Wget' in the body, and things like that. That might be annoying (although it is certainly an option to consider anyway) as someone sending a mail legitimately may assume the matter being obvious from the list's

Re: OK, time to moderate this list

2002-04-08 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: I was also thinking about checking for `Wget' in the body, and things like that. That might be annoying (although it is certainly an option to consider anyway) as someone sending a mail legitimately may

[ ±¤ °í ] 3°³¿ù ¸¸ ¿¡ ¿ù 500 ÀÌ»ó ¹ú ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù¸é ¹ÏÀ¸½Ã°Ú½À´Ï±î?

2002-04-08 Thread ±è¼ºÁø
-º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø ¹× Á¤º¸º¸È£ µî¿¡ °üÇÑ ¹ý·ü Á¦ 50Á¶¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ [±¤°í] ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù e-mailÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻó °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼­ ÃëµæÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù

[È«º¸]À̸ÞÀÏ È«º¸ÇϽǺи¸ º¸¼¼¿ä!!

2002-04-08 Thread ¹Ù´Ù
ÇѸÞÀÏÀÇ ¿ìÇ¥Á¦ ½Ç½Ã·Î ¸¹ÀÌ Èûµå½Ç°Å¶ó »ý°¢ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. Á¦°¡ ¾à°£ÀÇ µµ¿òÀ» µå¸±±îÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¾ÆÁÖ ÆÄ°ÝÀûÀÎ Á¦¾ÈÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¹ß¼ÛÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 2°³ ¸ÞÀÏÃßÃâÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 3°³ °Ô½ÃÆǵî·ÏÇÁ·Î±×·¥ 1°³¿Í ¸ÞÀÏ ¸®½ºÆ® 1000¸¸°³¸¦ 9¸¸¿ø¿¡ µå¸±±î ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ¸ÞÀϸ®½ºÆ®´Â ÇѸÞÀϵµ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ºÐ·ù´Â Á÷Á¢ÇÏ½Ã¸é µÉ°Ì´Ï´Ù.

[±¤ - °í]¿¬¿¹ÀÎ Æ÷ÅÐ ¾ÆÀÌ·¯ºê½ºÅ¸ ¿ÀÇÂ!

2002-04-08 Thread ILOVESTAR
Title: ÅåÅå Æ¢´Â °³¼ºÀÖ´Â µµ¸ÞÀÎ Æ÷¿öµù ¾ÆÀÌ·¯ºê½ºÅ¸ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.