The perfect tax write off awaits you inside 16822

2001-01-10 Thread winproduction
Title: Hello

Re: bad terminology: --html-extension

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Harkless
Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In main.c I'm reading: -E, --html-extension save all text/html documents with .html extension.\n\ Concerning Unix this isn't a good terminology. Well, first off, Wget doesn't only run on UNIX. We don't have "extensions" but filename

Re: WGET: failure for latest WGET to get ftp site

2001-01-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does this remain true? I'm afraid so. Case in point: ftpparse.c compiles with some warnings. Am I allowed to modify it? The copyright statement is vague, and Jan's inquiries have fallen on deaf ears.

Re: security and some of my ramblings

2001-01-10 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: By the way, Hrvoje, it wasn't clear to me on brief inspection why we sometimes don't hide the password (depending on the `hide' parameter). Could this be commented better? Because str_url() is not meant only for printing URLs. It's also for

Re: http.c - typo

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Harkless
Markus Buchhorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 21:13 9/01/01 -0800, Dan Harkless wrote: [...] Well, the original author (Hrvoje) used: Local file `%s' is more recent, not retrieving. I reworded it because like your "as new as" version, it's inaccurate -- the local file may have the

RE: SUGGESTION: rollback like GetRight

2001-01-10 Thread ZIGLIO Frediano
I suggest two parameter: - rollback-size - rollback-check-size where 0 = rollback-check-size = rollback-size The first for calculate the beginning of range (filesize - rollback-size) and the second for check (wget should check the range [filesize - rollback-size,filesize - rollback-size +

Re: SUGGESTION: rollback like GetRight

2001-01-10 Thread Jan Prikryl
Quoting ZIGLIO Frediano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I suggest two parameter: - rollback-size - rollback-check-size where 0 = rollback-check-size = rollback-size The first for calculate the beginning of range (filesize - rollback-size) and the second for check (wget should check the range

Re: wget does not continue

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Harkless
Jan Prikryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): How come that sometimes wget does not continue to download a file where it left off, but starts from the beginning again? It can't be that the file has changed on the server side because if I interrupt

Re: WGET: failure for latest WGET to get ftp site

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Harkless
Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jan Prikryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It really might be a ftpparse "bug" - the version included in 1.7dev does not support certain NT servers. Patches do exist - I just do not know if I'm allowed to patch the original ftpparse code. The situation

RE: SUGGESTION: rollback like GetRight

2001-01-10 Thread ZIGLIO Frediano
Rollback is usefull mainly for checking if file is not changed. You check (compare) download data with your file. freddy77 Quoting ZIGLIO Frediano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I suggest two parameter: - rollback-size - rollback-check-size where 0 = rollback-check-size = rollback-size The

Re: Spam

2001-01-10 Thread Karsten Thygesen
"Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje "Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is anyone else getting this junk, with the wget servers as the intermediary? Yes. As has been stated clearly, the sunsite.[auc.]dk issue and

Re: WGET: failure for latest WGET to get ftp site

2001-01-10 Thread Jan Prikryl
Quoting Dan Harkless ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): It really might be a ftpparse "bug" - the version included in 1.7dev does not support certain NT servers. [...] Yes, it appears that we'll be forced to remove ftpparse. :-( Does this remain true? If you mean NT support, no, the native NT

Re: Spam

2001-01-10 Thread Dan Harkless
David VanHorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is anyone else getting this junk, with the wget servers as the intermediary? Yes. As has been stated clearly, the sunsite.[auc.]dk issue and the existence of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward means that the list-address-must-be-in-to-or-cc SPAM protection