On Tuesday 22 February 2005 00:10, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If wide chars were in that message, you could no longer print it with
printf, which means that a majority of gettext-using programs would be
utterly broken, Wget included. I imagine I would have gotten a bunch
of bug reports for that
Simone Piunno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 22 February 2005 00:10, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If wide chars were in that message, you could no longer print it with
printf, which means that a majority of gettext-using programs would be
utterly broken, Wget included. I imagine I would have
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to portably use open() and retain large file support?
Try the AC_SYS_LARGEFILE autoconf macro.
That's what I thought I was using. I was just afraid that open()
wasn't correctly encompassed by the large file API's, a fear that
proved
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
You may also want AC_FUNC_FSEEKO for fseeko().
I wonder what is the difference between AC_FUNC_FSEEKO and
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(seeko). The manual doesn't seem to explain.
Well, that's what I have on my local system:
- Macro: AC_FUNC_FSEEKO
If
Maciej W. Rozycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder what is the difference between AC_FUNC_FSEEKO and
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(seeko). The manual doesn't seem to explain.
Well, that's what I have on my local system:
- Macro: AC_FUNC_FSEEKO
If the `fseeko' function is available, define
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I see. Now I know why I didn't use AC_FUNC_FSEEKO -- Wget doesn't use
fseeko anywhere. The only usage we have is:
fseek (fp, 0, SEEK_END);
size = ftell (fp); /* replaced with ftello where available */
Is there need to use fseeko
Did I ask the wrong question? I mean, it's not uncommon to ask about
the feasibility of adding new functionality.
If I am posting on the wrong list, I apologize.
Bryan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:09:11 +, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work as a webmaster for a US Government agency. We
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:09:11 +, Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automize cannot access PKI-enabled websites, as it does not support
that functionality. I was reading up about Wget, and I saw that you
can send a specific cookie back to a website. This is almost exactly
what I am looking
Jon,
I will check out the documentation. I had only checked on Wget's
site, I had thought that all the same documentation would be there as
well, but that what I get for assuming.
Many thanks
Bryan
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:22:30 +, Jonathan Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb
