I'm having trouble with the filename after retrieving a php generated
file download. It is retrieved with:
http://site.com/download/file.php?id=62651
The content disposition header says:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*=UTF-8''filename.zip
I want it to end up as filename.zip, but it
, but it's in the right place. I believe someone else
has seen this problem too (from the email archives IIRC).
Thanks for a great program!
Todd Pattist wrote:
I'm having trouble with the filename after retrieving a php generated
file download. It is retrieved with:
http://site.com/download
I'm having trouble understanding how accept and reject work,
particularly in the context of sites that rely on CGI and PHP to
dynamically generate html pages. My questions relate to the following:
1) I don't fully understand the -A and -R effects and the difference, if
any, between what links
Thank you for the quick response. Background is I'm on Windows XP, Gnu
wget 1.11
This "doesn't affect traversal of HTML files" functionality is currently
implemented via a heuristic based on the filename extension. That is, if
it ends in ".htm" or ".html", I believe, then it will be
Todd Pattist wrote:
Thank you for the quick response. Background is I'm on Windows XP, Gnu
wget 1.11
This doesn't affect traversal of HTML files functionality is currently
implemented via a heuristic based on the filename extension. That is, if
it ends in .htm or .html, I believe
Micah Cowan wrote:
Well, -E is special, true. But in general the second quote is (by
definition) correct.
- -E, obviously, _shouldn't_ be special...
I hope it's clear I'm not complaining. Wget is great and your efforts
are very much appreciated. I just wanted to document the behavior I was
When deciding whether it should delete a file afterwards, however, it
uses the _local_ filename (relevant code also in recur.c, near "Either
--delete-after was specified,"). I'm not positive, but this probably
means query strings _do_ matter in that case. :p
Confused? Coz I sure am!
If we were going to leave this behavior in for some time, then I think
it'd be appropriate to at least mention it (maybe I'll just mention it
anyway, without a comprehensive explanation
It would probably be sufficient to just add a very brief mention
to the docs of 1.11, the two things
Micah Cowan wrote:
Announcing the release of version 1.11.1 of GNU Wget.
** Documentation of accept/reject lists in the manual's Types of
Files section now explains various aspects of their behavior that may
be surprising, and notes that they may change in the future.
I'm glad to see that this
Micah Cowan wrote:
Unccl svefg bs Ncevy, sbyxf.
For greater clarity try:
http://www.rot13.com/index.php
10 matches
Mail list logo
