Quoting Dan Harkless ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm afraid so. Case in point: ftpparse.c compiles with some
warnings. Am I allowed to modify it? The copyright statement is
vague, and Jan's inquiries have fallen on deaf ears.
And I guess it'd be tough to find some other open source FTP
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this remain true?
I'm afraid so. Case in point: ftpparse.c compiles with some
warnings. Am I allowed to modify it? The copyright statement is
vague, and Jan's inquiries have fallen on deaf ears.
Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan Prikryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It really might be a ftpparse "bug" - the version included in 1.7dev
does not support certain NT servers. Patches do exist - I just do
not know if I'm allowed to patch the original ftpparse code. The
situation
Quoting Dan Harkless ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It really might be a ftpparse "bug" - the version included in 1.7dev
does not support certain NT servers. [...]
Yes, it appears that we'll be forced to remove ftpparse. :-(
Does this remain true?
If you mean NT support, no, the native NT
