Re: wget_new_percentage

2001-02-16 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:  I think a bigger problem is how the current display can go over 80 columns, In which case does it go over 80? Well, I haven't had a chance to play with

Re: wget_new_percentage

2001-02-15 Thread Hrvoje Niksic
"Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think a bigger problem is how the current display can go over 80 columns, In which case does it go over 80?

Re: wget_new_percentage

2001-02-15 Thread Dan Harkless
Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Dan Harkless" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:  I think a bigger problem is how the current display can go over 80 columns, In which case does it go over 80? Well, I haven't had a chance to play with the new feature in production yet, but the example

Re: wget_new_percentage

2001-02-15 Thread Dan Harkless
"Edward J. Sabol" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure, but there appears to be a problem whenever you resume a partially transferred file. Thanks for narrowing the problem down. For what it's worth, I vote in favor of adopting Vladi's format. The ETA is very useful. Perhaps even more