Daniel Stenberg responded to my original suggestion:
With this information, any time that wget encounters a form whose action
is
/cgi-bin/auth.cgi, it will enqueue the submission of the form using
the
values provided for the fields id and pw.
Now, why would wget do this?
There are many
Csaba Ráduly wrote:
I see that wget handles SCRIPT with tag_find_urls, i.e. it tries to
parse whatever it's inside.
Why was this implemented ? JavaScript is most
used to construct links programmatically. wget is likely to find
bogus URLs until it can properly parse JavaScript.
wget is
I wrote:
wget is parsing the attributes within the script tag, i.e., script
src=url. It does not examine the content between script and
/script.
and Ian Abbott responded:
I think it does, actually, but that is mostly harmless.
You're right. What I meant was that it does not examine the
Ian Abbott wrote:
For example, a recursive retrieval on a page like this:
html
body
script
a href=foo.htmlfoo/a
/script
/body
/html
will retrieve foo.html, regardless of the script.../script
tags.
We seem to be talking about two completely different things, Ian. A
Andre Majorel wrote:
Yes, that allows me to specify _A_ referrer, like www.aol.com. When I'm
trying to help my users mirror their old angelfire pages or something
like
that, very often the link has to come from the same directory. I'd like
to see something where when wget follows a
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The one remaining problem is the ETA. Based on the current speed, it
changes value wildly. Of course, over time it is generally
decreasing, but one can hardly follow it. I removed the flushing by
making sure that it's not shown more than once per second, but this
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I'll grab the other part and explain what curl does. It shows a
current
speed based on the past five seconds,
Does it mean that the speed doesn't change for five seconds, or that
you always show the *current* speed, but relative to the last five
seconds? I may be
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Is there any way to make Wget use HTTP/1.1 ?
Unfortunately, no.
In looking at the debug output, it appears to me that wget is really sending
HTTP/1.1 headers, but claiming that they are HTTP/1.0 headers. For example,
the Host header was not defined in RFC 1945, but wget
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
Hmm, it's too fragile in my opinion. What if a new version of Apache
defines a new format?
I think all of the expressions proposed thus far are too fragile. Consider
the following URL:
http://www.google.com/search?num=100q=%2Bwget+-GNU
The regular expression needs
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
I'm not sure what you are referring to. We are discussing a common
problem with static pages generated by default by Apache as index.html
objects for server's filesystem directories providing no default page.
Really? The original posting from Jamie Zawinski said:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
If your point is that Wget should print a warning when it can *prove*
that the Content-Length data it received was faulty, as in the case of
having received more data, I agree. We're already printing a similar
warning when Last-Modified is invalid, for example.
I'm
Brix Lichtenberg wrote:
But I'm still getting three or more virus mails with attachments 100k+
daily from the wget lists and they're blocking my mailbox (dial-up). And
getting those dumb system warnings accompanying them doesn't make it
better. Isn't there really no way to stop that (at
Herold Heiko wrote:
It would be better imho if the options itself are modified, in that case
the
variable option wouldn't be necessary, supposing we keep the and :, this
could be
--@http-passwd=passwd.txt --:proxy-passwd=0
It seems to me that a convention like this should be adopted (or
Frank Helk wrote:
Free (web based) scanning is available at http://www.antivirus.com.
Select Free tools in the top menu and then Scan Your PC, Free from
the list. You'll not even have to register to use it. Please.
It may not be so simple. Klez uses anti-anti-virus techniques to prevent
Nandita Shenvi wrote:
I have not copied the whole script but just the last few lines.The
variable
$all_links[3] has an URL:
http://bolinux39.europe.nokia.com/database2/MIDI100/GS001/01FINALC.MID.
the link follows a file, which I require.
I remove the http:// before calling the wget, but i
cyprien wrote:
I want to mirror my homesite, everything works fine expect one :
my site is a photo site based on php scipts : gallery
(http://gallery.sourceforge.net)
it have also some javascripts script...
[snip]
what can i do to have that (on mirror site) :
You cannot because wget does
Johannes Berg wrote:
Maybe this isn't really a bug in wget but rather in the file, but since
this is standard as exported from MS Word I'd like to see wget recognize
the images and download them.
Microsoft Word claims to create a valid HTML file. In fact, what it creates
can only reliably be
Ryan Underwood wrote:
It seems that some servers are broken and in order to fetch files with
certain
filenames, some characters that are normally encoded in HTTP sequences
must
be sent through unencoded. For example, I had a server the other day that
I was fetching files from at the URL:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Assume I have a site that I want to create a static mirror of. Normally
this site is database driven, but I figure if I spider the entire site,
and map all the GET URLS to static urls I can have a full mirror. Has
anyone known of this being successfully
Dick Penny wrote:
I have just successfully used WGET on a single file download. I even
figured
out how to specify a destination. But, I cannot seem to get wildcards
to
work. Help please:
wget -o log.txt -P c:/Documents and Settings/Administrator/My
Documents/CME_data/bt
George Prekas wrote:
I have found a bug in Wget version 1.8.2 concerning comment handling (
!--
comment -- ). Take a look at the following illegal HTML code:
HTML
BODY
a href=test1.htmltest1.html/a
!--
a href=test2.htmltest2.html/a
!--
/BODY
/HTML
Now, save the above snippet as
George Prekas wrote:
You are probably right. I have pointed this because I have seen pages that
use as a separator !-- with lots of dashes and althrough
Internet Explorer shows the page, wget can not download it correctly. What
do think about finishing the comment at the ?
After
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
I don't think so. Actually the rules for SGML comments are
somewhat different.
Georg, I think we're talking about apples and oranges here. I'm talking
about what is legitimate in a comment in an SGML document. I think you're
talking about what is legitimate as a comment
Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
why not just have the default wget behavior follow comments explicitly
(i've lost track whether wget does that or needs to be ammended) /and/
have an option that goes /beyond/ quirky comments and is just
--ignore-comments ? :)
The issue we've been discussing is what to
Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
i'm just saying what's going to happen when someone posts to this list:
My Web Pages have [insert obscure comment format] for comments and Wget
is considering them to (not) be comments. Can you change the [insert
Wget comment mode] comment mode to (not) recognize my
I tried to retreive a URL with Internet Explorer and it continued to
retrieve the URL forever. I tried to grab that same URL with wget, which
tried twice and then reported redirection cycle detected.
Perhaps we should send the wget code to someone in Redmond.
Tony
Rajesh wrote:
Wget is not mirroring the web site properly. For eg it is not copying
symbolic
links from the main web server.The target directories do exist on the
mirror
server.
wget can only mirror what can be seen from the web. Symbolic links will be
treated as hard references (assuming
Rajesh wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have tried using the command wget
--user-agent=Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1), but it
didn't
work.
Adding the user agent helps some people -- I think most often with web
servers from the evil empire.
I have one more question. In
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
The GNU project is looking for a new maintainer for wget, as the current
one
wishes to step down.
I think that means we need someone who:
1) is proficient in C
2) knows Internet protocols
3) is willing to learn the intricacies of wget
4) has the time to go through
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I'm curious: what is the use case for this? Why would you want to
save the unfollowed links to an external file?
I use this to determine what other websites a given website refers to.
For example:
wget
Suhas Tembe wrote:
1). I go to our customer's website every day log in using a User Name
Password.
[snip]
4). I save the source to a file subsequently perform various tasks on
that file.
What I would like to do is automate this process of obtaining the source
of a page using wget. Is
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Please be aware that Wget needs to know the size of the POST data
in advance. Therefore the argument to @code{--post-file} must be
a regular file; specifying a FIFO or something like
@file{/dev/stdin} won't work.
There's nothing that says you have to
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I don't understand what you're proposing. Reading the whole file in
memory is too memory-intensive for large files (one could presumably
POST really huge files, CD images or whatever).
I was proposing that you read the file to determine the length, but that was
on the
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
That would work for short streaming, but would be pretty bad in the
mkisofs example. One would expect Wget to be able to stream the data
to the server, and that's just not possible if the size needs to be
known in advance, which HTTP/1.0 requires.
One might expect it,
I've been on this list for a couple of years now and I've always wondered
how our illustrious leader pronounces his name.
Can you give us linguistically challenged Americans a phonetic rendition of
your name?
Tony Lewis (toe knee loo iss)
Hrvoje and I have had an off-list dialogue about this subject. We've settled
on HUR-voy-eh as the closest phonetic rendition of his name for English
speakers. It helps to remember that the r is rolled.
Tony
I'm trying to figure out how to do a POST followed by a GET.
If I do something like:
wget http://www.somesite.com/post.cgi --post-data 'a=1b=2'
http://www.somesite.com/getme.html -d
I get the following behavior:
POST /post.cgi HTTP/1.0
snip
[POST data: a=1b=2]
snip
POST /getme.html HTTP/1.0
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Maybe the right thing would be for `--post-data' to only apply to the
URL it precedes, as in:
wget --post-data=foo URL1 --post-data=bar URL2 URL3
snip
But I'm not at all sure that it's even possible to do this and keep
using getopt!
I'll start by saying that I
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I like these suggestions. How about the following: for 1.9, document
that `--post-data' expects one URL and that its behavior for multiple
specified URLs might change in a future version.
Then, for 1.10 we can implement one of the alternative behaviors.
That works for
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I'm about to release 1.9 today, unless it takes more time to upload it
to ftp.gnu.org.
If there's a serious problem you'd like fixed in 1.9, speak up now or
be silent until 1.9.1. :-)
I thought we were going to turn our attention to 1.10. :-)
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Incidentally, Wget is not the only browser that has a problem with
that. For me, Mozilla is simply showing the source of
http://www.minskshop.by/cgi-bin/shop.cgi?id=1cookie=set, because
the returned content-type is text/plain.
On the other hand, Internet Explorer will
Philip Mateescu wrote:
A warning message would be nice when for not so obvious reasons wget
doesn't behave as one would expect.
I don't know if there are other tags that could change wget's behavior
(like -r and meta name=robots do), but if they happen it would be
useful to have a message.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I'm curious... is anyone using the patch list to track development?
I'm posting all my changes to that list, and sometimes it feels a lot
like talking to myself. :-)
I read the introductory stuff to see what's changed, but I never extract the
patches from the messages.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Assume that Wget has retrieved a document from the host A, which
hasn't closed the connection in accordance with Wget's keep-alive
request.
Then Wget needs to connect to host B, which is really the same as A
because the provider uses DNS-based virtual hosts. Is it OK
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The thing is, I don't want to bloat Wget with obscure options to turn
off even more obscure (and *very* rarely needed) optimizations. Wget
has enough command-line options as it is. If there are cases where
the optimization doesn't work, I'd rather omit it completely.
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Have you seen the rest of the discussion? Would it do for you if Wget
correctly handled something like:
wget --header='Host: jidanni.org' http://216.46.192.85/
I think that is an elegant solution.
Tony
antonio taylor wrote:
http://fisrtname lastname:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you tried http://fisrtname%20lastname:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure if this is a bug, but it's really out of my expectation.
Here is the way to reproduce the problem.
1. Put the URL http://ichart.yahoo.com/b?s=CSCO into the browser and
then drag out the image. It should be a file with .png extension. So I
believe this
Danny Linkov wrote:
I'd like to download recursively the content of a web
directory WITHOUT AN INDEX file.
What shows up in your web browser if you enter the directory (such as
http://www.somesite.com/dir/)?
The most common responses are:
* some HTML file selected by the server (often
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 8:04 AM
Subject: wget Suggestion: ability to scan ports BESIDE #80, (like 443)
Anyway Thanks for WGET!
What's wrong with wget https://www.somesite.com ?
Gisle Vanem wrote:
I've searched google and the only way AFAICS to get redirection
in a GUI app to work is to create 3 pipes. Then use a thread (or
run_with_timeout with infinite timeout) to read/write the console
handles to put/get data into/from the parent's I/O handles. I don't
fully
Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
Thank you for supporting IPv6 in wget v 1.9.1. Unfortunately, wget v
1.9.1 does not work well, at least, on NetBSD.
NetBSD does not allow to use IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses for security
reasons. To know the background of this, please refer to:
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
NetBSD etc. is NOT RFC compliant here, however, it would be better if one
supports wider platforms / configurations.
My patch is quick hack'ed, but I believe that it should work for NetBSD
and FreeBSD 5. Please consider applying it.
It's not my call as to whether
Anurag Jain wrote:
downloading a bin big file(268MB) using wget command on our solrise
box using
wget http url/bin filename which located on some webserver it start
downloading
it and after 42% it give a msg no disk space available and it get
stopped. although i
check on sever lot more
Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
Since I have experiences to modify IPv4 only programs, including FTP
and HTTP, to IPv6-IPv4 one, I know this problem. Yes, some part of
wget *would* remain protocol dependent.
Kazu, it's been said that a picture is worth a thousand words. Perhaps in
this case, a patch
robi sen wrote:
Hi I have a client who basically needs to regularly grab content from
part of their website and mirror or it and or save it so they can
disseminate it as HTML on a CD. The website though is written in
ColdFusion as requires application level authentication which is just
form
running older OS versions to confirm that.) For
example, on my Windows XP machine, I have to following variables:
HOMEDRIVE=C:
HOMEPATH=\Documents and Settings\Tony Lewis
so my home directory is C:\Documents and Settings\Tony Lewis
HTH,
Tony
Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
I placed use_proxy = off to .wgetrc (which file I did not have earlier)
and to ~/wget/etc/wgetrc (which file I had), and tried
wget --proxy=off http://www.maqamworld.com
and it still does not work.
Could there be some system wgetrc files somewhere? I have compiled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across a problem accessing an FTP site where
the password contained a @ sign. The password was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] So I tried the following:
wget -np --server-response -H --tries=1 -c
--wait=60 --retry-connrefused -R *
ftp://guest:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I found out a little bit more about the
real reason for the problem. Opera has a very
convenient option called Encode International
Web Addresses with UTF-8. When I had this
option checked, it could retrieve the file
without problems. Without this option
How do you enter the path in your web browser?
- Original Message -
From: Bufford, Benjamin (AGRE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 7:32 AM
Subject: OpenVMS URL
I am trying to use wget to retrieve a file from an OpenVMS server but have
been unable
Then your problem isn't with wget. Once you figure out how to access the
file in a web browser, use the same URL in wget.
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Bufford, Benjamin (AGRE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tony Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:41 AM
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Wget could always support a URL parameter, such as:
wget 'ftp://server/dir1/dir2/file;disk=foo'
Assuming, you can detect a VMS connection, why not simply
ftp://server/foo:[dir1.dir2]?
Tony
henry luo wrote:
i find a problem at GNU Wget 1.9.1, but i dont know it is a new
function or a bug;
the old version(1.8.2) download a link ,for example:
wget
'http://www.expekt.com/odds/eventsodds.jsp?range=100sortby=dateactive=
bettingbetcategoryId=SOC%25'
Phil Endecott wrote:
I am using wget to build a downloadable zip file for offline viewing of
a CGI-intensive web site that I am building.
Essentially it works, but I am encountering difficulties with semicolons.
I use semicolons in CGI URIs to separate parameters. (Ampersand is more
often
, wget encodes it to create a valid name.
Tony Lewis wrote:
I use semicolons in CGI URIs to separate parameters. (Ampersand
is more often used for this, but semicolon is also allowed and
has the advantage that there is no need to escape it in HTML.)
There is no need to escape ampersands
Phil Endecott wrote:
Tony The stuff between the quotes following HREF is not HTML; it
Tony is a URL. Hence, it must follow URL rules not HTML rules.
No, it's both a URL and HTML. It must follow both rules.
Please see the page that I cited in my previous message:
Malte Schünemann wrote:
Since wget is able to obtain directoy listings / retrieve data from
there is should be possible to also upload data
Then it would be wput. :-)
What is so special about wget that it is able to perform this task?
You can learn a LOT about how wget is communicating with
Ploc wrote:
The result is a website very different from the original one as it lacks
backgrounds.
Can you please confirm if what I think is true (or not), if it is
registered as a bug, and if there is a date planning to correct it.
It is true. wget only retrieves objects that appear in the
Ploc wrote:
Is it already registered as a bug or in a whishlist ?
It's not a bug. This feature has been on the wishlist for a long time.
Tony
Stratus VOS supportJonathan Grubb wrote:
Any thoughts of adding support for Stratus VOS file structures?
Your question is a little too vague -- even for me (I used to work for
Stratus and actually know what VOS is :-)
What file structures are you needing supported that wget does not currently
Jonathan Grubb wrote:
Um. I'm using wget on Win2000 to ftp to a VOS machine. I'm finding that
the
usual '' sign for directories isn't supported by wget and that '/'
doesn't
work either, I think because the ftp server itself is expecting ''.
The problem may be that Win 2000 grabs the before
Justin Gombos wrote:
Since I feel that computers serve man, not the reverse, so I don't
intend to change my file organization to be web page centric. Looking
around the web, I was quite surprized to find that I'm the only one
with this problem. I was very relieved to find that there was a wput
-
Anthony Caetano wrote:
I am looking for a way to stay current without mirroring an entire site.
[snip]
Does anyone else see a use for this?
Yes. Here's my non-wget solution. I truncate all the files in the
directories that I don't want, but maintain the date/time accessed and
modified. The
John J Foerch wrote:
It seems that the system of using the metric prefixes for numbers 2^n is a
simple accident of history. Any thoughts on this?
I would say that the practice of using powers of 10 for K and M is a
response to people who cannot think in binary.
Tony
Carlos Villegas snidely wrote:
I would say that the original poster understands what he is saying, and
you clearly don't...
I'll put my computer science degree up against your business administration
and accounting degree any day.
A kilobyte has always been 1024 bytes and the choice was not
Mark Post wrote:
While we're at it, why don't we just round off the value of pi to be 3.0
Do you live in Indiana?
Actually, Dr. Edwin Goodwin wanted to round off pi to any of several values
including 3.2.
http://www.agecon.purdue.edu/crd/Localgov/Second%20Level%20pages/Indiana_Pi_
Story.htm
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
Alle 18:28, mercoled 5 gennaio 2005, Draen Kacar ha scritto:
Jan Minar wrote:
What's wrong with mbrtowc(3) and friends? The mysterious solution
is probably to use wprintf(3) instead printf(3). Couple of
questions on #c on freenode would give you that answer.
Normand Savard wrote:
I have a question about wget. Is is possible to download other attribute
value other than the harcoded ones?
No, at least not in the existing versions of wget. I have not heard that
anyone is working on such an enhancement.
Jesus Legido wrote:
I'm getting a file from https://mfi-assets.ecb.int/dla/EA/ea_all_050303.txt:
The problem is not with wget. The file on the server
starts with 0xFF 0xFE. Put the following into an HTML file (say temp.html) on
your hard drive, open it in your web browser, right click on
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
I don't see how and why a web site would generate headers (not bodies, to
be sure) larger than 64k.
To be honest, I'm less concerned about the 64K header limit than I am about
limiting a header line to 4096 bytes. I don't know any sites that send back
header lines that
The --post-data option was added in version 1.9. You need to upgrade your
version of wget.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Richard Emanilov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:49 AM
To: Tony Lewis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: wget@sunsite.dk
Subject: RE: help!!!
wget
Jens Rösner wrote:
AFAIK, RegExp for (HTML?) file rejection was requested a few times, but is
not implemented at the moment.
It seems all the examples people are sending are just attempting to get a
match that is not case sensitive. A switch to ignore case in the file name
match would be a
Alan Thomas wrote:
I am having trouble getting the files I want using a wildcard specifier...
There are no options on the command line for what you're attempting to do.
Neither wget nor the server you're contacting understand *.pdf in a URI.
In the case of wget, it is designed to read web
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The question is what should we do for 1.10? Document the
unreadable names and cryptic values, and have to support
them until eternity?
My vote is to change them to more reasonable syntax (as you suggested
earlier in the note) for 1.10 and include the new syntax in the
Andrzej wrote:
Two problems:
There is no index.html under this link:
http://znik.wbc.lublin.pl/Mineraly/Ftp/UpLoad/
[snip]
it creates a non existing link:
http://znik.wbc.lublin.pl/Mineraly/Ftp/UpLoad/index.html
When you specify a directory, it is up to the web server to determine what
Maurice Volaski wrote:
wget's -m option seems to be able to ignore most of the files it should
download from a site. Is this simply because wget can download only the
files it can see? That is, if the web server's directory indexing option
is off and a page on the site is present on the
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
In fact, I know of no application that accepts numbers as Wget prints
them.
Microsoft Calculator does.
Tony
I got a "Name or
service not known" error from wget 1.10 running on Linux. When I installed an
earlier version of wget, it worked just fine.It also works just fine on
version 1.10 running on Windows. Any ideas?
Here's the output on
Linux:
wget --versionGNU Wget 1.9-beta1
wget
Larry Jones wrote:
Of course it's directly accessible -- you just have to quote it to keep
the
shell from processing the parentheses:
cd 'title.Die-Struck+(Gold+on+Gold)+Lapel+Pins'
You can also make the individual characters into literals:
cd
PoWah Wong wrote:
The login page is:
http://safari.informit.com/?FPI=uicode=
How to figure out the login command?
These two commands do not work:
wget --save-cookies cookies.txt http://safari.informit.com/?FPI= [snip]
wget --save-cookies cookies.txt
Pat Malatack wrote:
is there a
way to stay connected, because it seems to me that this takes a decent amount of
time that could be minimized
The following
command will do what you want:
wget "google.com/news"
"google.com/froogle"
Tony
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
this is a very interesting point, but the patch you mentioned above uses
the
LIST -a FTP command, which AFAIK is not supported by all FTP servers.
As I recall, that's why the patch was not accepted. However, it would be
useful if there were some command line option to
Eberhard Wolff wrote:
Apparently wget can't handle large file.
[snip]
wget --version GNU Wget 1.8.2
This bug was fixed in version 1.10 of wget. You should obtain a copy of
the latest version, 1.10.2.
Tony
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Only ping works for bbc.com and not wget.
When I issue the command wget www.bbc.com, it successfully downloads the
following file:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN
HTML
HEAD
META HTTP-EQUIV=Refresh content=0;
Jonathan DeGumbia wrote:
I'm trying to use the --directory-prefix=prefix option for wget on a
Windows system. My prefix has spaces in the path directories. Wget
appears to terminate the path at the first space encountered. In other
words if my prefix is: c:/my prefix/ then wget copies
I believe the following simplified code would have the same
effect:
if ((opt.recursive || opt.page_requisites || opt.use_proxy) url_scheme
(*t) != SCHEME_FTP) status = retrieve_tree (*t);else
status = retrieve_url (*t, filename, redirected_URL, NULL,
dt);
Tony
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
i would like to read other users' opinion before deciding which
course of action to take, though.
Other users have suggested adding a command line option for -a two or
three times in the past:
- 2002-11-24: Steve Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitted a patch
- 2002-12-24:
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
The cast to int looks like someone was trying to remove a warning and
botched operator precedence in the process.
I can't see any good reason to use , here. Why not write the line as:
eta_hrs = eta / 3600; eta %= 3600;
This makes it much less likely that someone
How many keywords do we need to provide maximum flexibility on the
components of the URI? (I'm thinking we need five.)
Consider http://www.example.com/path/to/script.cgi?foo=bar
--filter=uri:regex could match against any part of the URI
--filter=domain:regex could match against www.example.com
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
