Re: [whatwg] Parsing, syntax, and content model feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:51:52 +0100, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote: PS: what we probably need now is more implementation of current W3C Reccomandations like XForms 1.0, instead of running behind the latest HTML5 Editor's Drafts) FWIW, the reason the WHATWG was founded was

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Ian Hickson
I have carefully read all the feedback in this thread concerning associating text with video, for various purposes such as captions, annotations, etc. Taking a step back as far as I can tell there are two axes: where the timed text comes from, and how it is rendered. Where it comes from, it

[whatwg] Canvas arcTo all points on a line

2008-12-27 Thread Dirk Schulze
Hi, have two questions to the all points on a line part of canvas' arcTo. A short example: moveTo(50,0); arcTo(100,0, 0,0, 10); This should add a new, from p1 infinite far away, point to the subpath and draw a straight line to it. Two questions. 1) If I add lineTo(50, 50); after arcTo(..).

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Hi Ian, Thanks for taking the time to go through all the options, analyse and understand them - especially on your birthday! :-) Much appreciated! I agree with your analysis and the 6 options you have identified. However, I disagree slightly with the conclusions you have come to - mostly from a

Re: [whatwg] Canvas arcTo all points on a line

2008-12-27 Thread Dirk Schulze
I believe adding an infinite far away point is wrong and insteaed nothing should be drawn at all and I would like to explain my reason: Imagine 2 vectors. One from (x1, y1) to (x0, y0) and one from (x1, y1) to (x2, y2). For moveTo(100, 0); arcTo(150,0, 50, 0, 10); the angle between the two

[whatwg] (X)HTML + SMIL?

2008-12-27 Thread Giovanni Campagna
Very back in 2002, a W3C Note about the integration of XHTML (at that time was 1.1, now it would be 2.0) and SMIL (at that time 2.0, now 3.0). I was wondering if any work was produced because of that document, or it was simply forgotten. IMHO, it addresses many issues: 1) the video HTML5 element

Re: [whatwg] (X)HTML + SMIL?

2008-12-27 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
On 27/12/08 16:15, Giovanni Campagna wrote: 1) the video HTML5 element can be replaced by SMIL video into XHTML2 documents, alongside with the SMIL DOM, quite similar to HTML5 media DOM. It also solves accessibility problems such as how to put subtitles into video (use the SMIL Text Module)

Re: [whatwg] (X)HTML + SMIL?

2008-12-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote: 2) CSS Transitions, that currently are WebKit propietary extensions, can be implemented using SMIL Animation Module. What is more important, many browsers already implement SMIL Animations on SVG elements, so

Re: [whatwg] Error propagation in child workers

2008-12-27 Thread ben turner
I'm implementing these latest changes and it looks like there are some typos in this edit: - The ErrorEvent interface has a 'fileno' property, not a 'lineno' property as mentioned elsewhere. I believe it should be 'lineno'. - There's a stray 'span' before 'queue a task'. Then I have a few more

Re: [whatwg] Thoughts on video accessibility

2008-12-27 Thread Calogero Alex Baldacchino
Silvia Pfeiffer ha scritto: Hi Ian, Thanks for taking the time to go through all the options, analyse and understand them - especially on your birthday! :-) Much appreciated! Than, happy birthday to Ian! [...] The only real issue that we have with separate files is that the captions may

Re: [whatwg] Modal dialogs in HTML5

2008-12-27 Thread Philipp Serafin
timeless schrieb: On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Philipp Serafin phil...@gmail.com wrote: Well, you could still phrase it something along the lines of The size of a popup document's viewport SHOULD be calculated using the CSS shrink wrap algorithm... etc etc. as an embedder of a

Re: [whatwg] (X)HTML + SMIL?

2008-12-27 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, Giovanni Campagna wrote: Very back in 2002, a W3C Note about the integration of XHTML (at that time was 1.1, now it would be 2.0) and SMIL (at that time 2.0, now 3.0). I was wondering if any work was produced because of that document, or it was simply forgotten. IE

Re: [whatwg] Error propagation in child workers

2008-12-27 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, ben turner wrote: I'm implementing these latest changes and it looks like there are some typos in this edit: - The ErrorEvent interface has a 'fileno' property, not a 'lineno' property as mentioned elsewhere. I believe it should be 'lineno'. - There's a stray

Re: [whatwg] Modal dialogs in HTML5

2008-12-27 Thread Martin Atkins
Philipp Serafin wrote: timeless schrieb: On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Philipp Serafin phil...@gmail.com wrote: Well, you could still phrase it something along the lines of The size of a popup document's viewport SHOULD be calculated using the CSS shrink wrap algorithm... etc etc.

[whatwg] Semantics and related feedback

2008-12-27 Thread Ian Hickson
This is a bulk reply to a bunch of HTML5 semantics-related posts on the WHATWG list. On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Eduard Pascual wrote: Your only fault, just like me, was to believe this was a serious place for discussion. But it isn't: it is just a tool: feedback praising the spec will be kept