[whatwg] [OT] OpenWebIndia

2010-08-02 Thread Narendra Sisodiya
We are trying to collect Indian Developer who would like participate on HTML5/openweb discussion and start community workshop in India for advocacy for html5-related technologies. Thanks http://mail.openwebindia.org/mailman/listinfo/openwebindia_openwebindia.org -- ┌─┐ │

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Chris Pearce wrote: There's a race condition in the media load algorithm. When the resource selection algorithm begins, it sets a task to complete the rest of the resource selection algorithm asynchronously. Not quite. It awaits a stable state and then runs a synchronous

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Jeremy Keith
Dennis wrote: I have an idea which would be very cool for HTML5. Having a Content-Disposition property on a tags which does the same as the HTTP Header. For example changing the file name of the file to be downloaded or rather have a image file download rather than it being shown in the

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Ben Schwarz
I'm really not too sure what pre-existing problem this actually solves. Given that a server sets the correct mime-types for a given resource, we know what type it is already. Setting the Content-disposition on the client side creates an annoying user experience. If I want to open a link in a new

Re: [whatwg] Please consider dropping the sandbox attribute from the iframe element

2010-08-02 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Aug 1, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: Summary: The new 'sandbox' feature on iframe should be considered for removal. It needs a security review, it will be a lot of work to implement properly, and may not actually solve the problem it is intending to solve. More details here:

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread And Clover
On 07/30/2010 06:43 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote: all array functions defined in ES5 are generic in that they work over any array-like object. They're guaranteed to work over any array-like native JavaScript object. They're *not* guaranteed to work on host objects like the various node lists.

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 8/2/10 5:17 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: There's a race condition in the media load algorithm. When the resource selection algorithm begins, it sets a task to complete the rest of the resource selection algorithm asynchronously. Not quite. It awaits a stable state and then runs a synchronous

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Dennis Joachimsthaler
Jeremy Keith jer...@adactio.com wrote: Dennis wrote: ... Hang on... isn't the mechanism for this already available via the type attribute? For example: a href=/path/to/image.jpg type=image/jpegFull size image/a That wouldn't help in this case... A browser could offer a preference

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Dennis Joachimsthaler
Ben Schwarz ben.schw...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really not too sure what pre-existing problem this actually solves. Given that a server sets the correct mime-types for a given resource, we know what type it is already. Yes, since we don't want to set MIME-Types. I want to be able to set what a

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Jeremy Keith
Dennis wrote: Yes, but that wouldn't help since I want to force downloads regardless of the browser settings. Ah, I see. In that case, I fundamentally disagree with what you are asking for. Final control should be in the hands of the user, not the author. -- Jeremy Keith a d a c t i o

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 18:09 +0200, Dennis Joachimsthaler wrote: Ben Schwarz ben.schw...@gmail.com wrote: I'm really not too sure what pre-existing problem this actually solves. Given that a server sets the correct mime-types for a given resource, we know what type it is already. Yes,

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Michael Kozakewich mkozakew...@icosidodecahedron.com wrote: Dennis wrote: Yes, but that wouldn't help since I want to force downloads regardless of the browser settings. Maybe it would do if the type was set to application/octet-stream, since those, by default,

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Oliver Hunt
On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:36 AM, And Clover wrote: On 07/30/2010 06:43 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote: all array functions defined in ES5 are generic in that they work over any array-like object. They're guaranteed to work over any array-like native JavaScript object. They're *not* guaranteed to work

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Kornel Lesiński
On 2 Aug 2010, at 17:21, Michael Kozakewich wrote: Dennis wrote: Yes, but that wouldn't help since I want to force downloads regardless of the browser settings. Maybe it would do if the type was set to application/octet-stream, since those, by default, always get downloaded. People don't

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Tab Atkins Jr.
2010/8/2 Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net: Downloads can be forced already with Content-Disposition: attachment. It's just harder to do, and unfortunately that doesn't stop webmasters from trying. Popular PHP snippets for forcing download are among the most disgusting cargo-cult code

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Dennis Joachimsthaler
Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote: On 2 Aug 2010, at 17:21, Michael Kozakewich wrote: I agree that it's not good to force users in general. However, this attribute can be implemented only as a hint for browsers to display Open/Save dialog. Users wouldn't be forced to download the

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Markus Ernst
Am 02.08.2010 18:21 schrieb Michael Kozakewich: Dennis wrote: Yes, but that wouldn't help since I want to force downloads regardless of the browser settings. Maybe it would do if the type was set to application/octet-stream, since those, by default, always get downloaded. People don't often

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Michael Kozakewich mkozakew...@icosidodecahedron.com wrote: People don't often like it when they're forced to do something. If they want to download it, they can select Save Link As... from their browser. If the author can predict that the user probably wants to

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 8/2/10 1:15 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: If you don't agree that this use-case is worth adding the feature for, do you think that: 3) Something else? For the use case your describe, it might just make more sense for browsers to support Content-Disposition on data: URIs directly somehow...

Re: [whatwg] Please consider simplifying authoring guidance for the img alt attribute

2010-08-02 Thread Markus Ernst
Am 01.08.2010 11:43 schrieb Tantek Çelik: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Img_Alt I encourage fellow web authors to add opinions/comments. My personal opinion on the alt attribute is that: - it should only be used if the image is crucial for understanding the content, or for navigation (such as

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Web Storage expiration

2010-08-02 Thread Nicholas Zakas
If a site could create multiple Storage areas, then I would agree that per-item expiration wouldn't be necessary and we could get along fine with per-storage expiration. However, that's not the case, and the expiration use case is clearly already present. Having every developer that wants to

Re: [whatwg] Please consider simplifying authoring guidance for the img alt attribute

2010-08-02 Thread Ashley Sheridan
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 17:19 +0200, Markus Ernst wrote: - search engines should generally ignore text in the alt attribute, but evaluate the title attribute instead Rationale: 4.8.1.1.12 says: A corollary to this is that the alt attribute's value should never contain text that could

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote: So the model is that there are asynchronous tasks but there are also things that run after the current asynchronous task finishes? It's a little more detailed than that, but yes, that describes the event loop model. How are we defining current

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Garrett Smith
On 8/2/10, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote: On Aug 2, 2010, at 7:36 AM, And Clover wrote: On 07/30/2010 06:43 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote: all array functions defined in ES5 are generic in that they work over any array-like object. They're guaranteed to work over any array-like native

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 8/2/10 3:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: How are we defining current asynchronous task and finish? In terms of the event loop algorithm: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/webappapis.html#processing-model-2 Ah, I see. Is the note there about synchronous sections

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Oliver Hunt
On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: I also linked to the old catchalls proposal earlier in the thread. That is because the host objects mentioned here have a specialized catchall behavior that isn't yet defined by any specification, so when the code has property access with an

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Web Storage expiration

2010-08-02 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: If a site could create multiple Storage areas, then I would agree that per-item expiration wouldn't be necessary and we could get along fine with per-storage expiration. However, that's not the case, and the

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote: On 8/2/10 3:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: How are we defining current asynchronous task and finish? In terms of the event loop algorithm: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/webappapis.html#processing-model-2 Ah, I

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: The e-mails quoted below consist of the salient points of this thread: On Fri,

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread And Clover
On 08/02/2010 09:57 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: Can it be argued as to what integer index means? And what is a string index? Good catch, that's pretty ambiguous language. Browsers implement this as if integer index were equal to the term array index defined section 15.4 of ECMA262 (that is an

Re: [whatwg] [canvas] getContext multiple contexts

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Vladimir Vukicevic wrote: A while ago questions came up in the WebGL WG about using a canvas with multiple rendering contexts, and synchronization issues that arise there. Here's our suggested change to getContext. This seems overly complex. I've gone for a somewhat

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Chris Pearce
On 2/08/2010 9:17 p.m., Ian Hickson wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Chris Pearce wrote: There's a race condition in the media load algorithm. When the resource selection algorithm begins, it sets a task to complete the rest of the resource selection algorithm asynchronously. Not quite. It awaits a

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Garrett Smith
On 8/2/10, And Clover and...@doxdesk.com wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:57 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: Can it be argued as to what integer index means? And what is a string index? Good catch, that's pretty ambiguous language. Browsers implement this as if integer index were equal to the term array

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Web Storage expiration

2010-08-02 Thread Nicholas Zakas
Yes, for IndexDB I think having a per-storage area expiration date completely makes sense. Do you expect that IndexedDB will become a successor to sessionStorage/localStorage? My belief is that the simple key-value store paradigm would still end up being the default client-side data storage

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-08-02 Thread Garrett Smith
On 8/2/10, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/2/10, And Clover and...@doxdesk.com wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:57 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: [...] ({}).hasOwnProperty.call(document.links, 0); - and resulting true in IE. However, that hasOwnProperty check does not always true for

Re: [whatwg] The real issue with HTML5's sectioning model

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Eduard Pascual wrote: Basically, most of the issues with headings boil down to a single fact: the sectioning model is (probably needlessly) over-bloated. [...] And now, in HTML5, not only have h1-6 been kept, but a plethora of new elements: section, nav, aside,

Re: [whatwg] :checked should match selected option elements

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, L. David Baron wrote: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#selector-checked defines what elements match the :checked pseudo-class. However, I think it's missing an important case: selected option elements within a select.

Re: [whatwg] Should :default apply to checkboxes, radios, and options?

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, L. David Baron wrote: For a long time, Gecko has implemented the behavior that the :default pseudo-class matches checkboxes, radios, and options that are selected by default (i.e., anything that matches :checked by default). I think supporting it for option elements is

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Web Storage expiration

2010-08-02 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Nicholas Zakas nza...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Yes, for IndexDB I think having a per-storage area expiration date completely makes sense. Do you expect that IndexedDB will become a successor to sessionStorage/localStorage? My belief is that the simple key-value

Re: [whatwg] definition of :link and :visited should allow flexibility

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, L. David Baron wrote: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html#selector-link says: # All a elements that have an href attribute, all area elements # that have an href attribute, and all link elements that have an # href attribute, must

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 1 May 2010, rya...@mail.com wrote: My suggestion for the HTML5 spec is that the video tag should have a feature that can enable GPU acceleration on a user's graphics card, so it will take some stress off the CPU. Do you like my suggestion? Why would a user ever want anyone to

Re: [whatwg] RFC: input type=username

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
This thread primarily discussed ways to allow users to log in and out of sites, possibly through improvements to the forms model. This is an area that seems to be under a lot of active research, so it's probably premature to change the HTML spec at this point. I haven't introduced any new

Re: [whatwg] Questions about meter element

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 5 May 2010, yael.aha...@nokia.com wrote: I have a couple of questions regarding the meter element. 1. I could not find the meter element in the tables in http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#annotations-for-assistive-technology-products-aria. What is the ARIA role for the

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Sat, 1 May 2010, rya...@mail.com wrote: My suggestion for the HTML5 spec is that the video tag should have a feature that can enable GPU acceleration on a user's graphics card, so it will take some stress off the CPU. Do

Re: [whatwg] Input URL State and Files object

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote: On 5/5/2010 12:42 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote: Awhile ago, it appears, the files object was removed from input type=url files doesn't really make much sense for type=url... Do you mean

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread James Robinson
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Sat, 1 May 2010, rya...@mail.com wrote: My suggestion for the HTML5 spec is that the video tag should have a feature that can enable GPU

Re: [whatwg] RFC: input type=username

2010-08-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: This thread primarily discussed ways to allow users to log in and out of sites, possibly through improvements to the forms model. This is an area that seems to be under a lot of active research, so it's probably premature to

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Dirk Pranke wrote: Why would a user ever want anyone to disable their GPU acceleration? I believe I've heard people say that they might sometimes want this for power management, i.e. performing the same computation on the GPU might take more power than performing it

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Dirk Pranke wrote: Why would a user ever want anyone to disable their GPU acceleration? I believe I've heard people say that they might sometimes want this for power management, i.e. performing the same

Re: [whatwg] Expanding the cite element

2010-08-02 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote: Is there any value in adding an href or uri or similar attribute to the cite element to indicate a location for a work (or information about the work) or, in the case of a URI, an indicator that can be used as a reference programmatically?

Re: [whatwg] suggestion for HTML5 spec

2010-08-02 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Dirk Pranke wrote: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Dirk Pranke wrote: Why would a user ever want anyone to disable their GPU acceleration? I

Re: [whatwg] Race condition in media load algorithm

2010-08-02 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 8/2/10 5:20 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: Or does stop the currently running task in #spin-the-event-loop imply a jump to step 2 of the algorithm under #processing-model2? Yes. OK, that might be worth clarifying. (Note: I still have a problem with the way pause is defined here, but I've raised

Re: [whatwg] Content-Disposition property for a tags

2010-08-02 Thread James May
Perhaps to avoid the legacy baggage it could be a simple attribute eg. a href=blah download This would prevent duplicating 'type', and bringing in all the knowledge people seem to not have about how 'content-disposition' works in headers. or even an extension of target? eg. a href=blah

Re: [whatwg] Input URL State and Files object

2010-08-02 Thread Charles Pritchard
On 8/2/2010 6:54 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote: Sorry, it didn't make much sense: I meant a FileList object which FileReader would use. I still don't really see what you want here. Is there currently a method for allowing cross-domain access