), an it _far_ outperforms MPEG-1.
Indeed.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbj...@ulsberg.no
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
, no?
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbj...@ulsberg.no
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:52:32 +0100, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Speaking of hr, having a default style for it would increase
interoperability (if only in the presentation layer) a great deal.
Done.
Excellent!
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbj...@ulsberg.no
«He's
? If there's prior discussion regarding this, I'd really
appreciate a pointer. Thanks!
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbj...@ulsberg.no
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
zero steps in the right direction. Cookies have their place, but
authentication is theoretically imho not one of them. In practice, there's
really no other alternative today.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
zero steps in the right direction. Cookies have their place, but
authentication is theoretically imho not one of them. In practice, there's
really no other alternative today.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-authentform
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
the underlying reason of why something is presented
the way it is to transfer that presentation to another environment. And
for that you need the semantics.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
smallprint, it works just fine.
Since my initial reply might have been a bit too colored by the HTML4
definition of the element and its current usage on the web, I hereby withdraw
my comment and conclude that I mostly agree with you. :-)
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED
elements have already been lowercased elsewhere?
I think that non-XHTML elements should stay as entered.
Same questions with attribute names ;-)
Same answer, imo. :)
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
fragments of Relax-NG, I
believe there's a place for informal fragments of CSS as well.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
and I doubt
I ever will. I usually adjust paddings and margins to 0 on all elements,
but that's about it.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
point exactly. I asked with CSS2.1, so the answer is it can't be
done.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
for free open source implementations as Firefox, for
instance.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
to cross post your message to both public-html
and whatwg, just pick one or the other.
I didn't know that the question was answered so trivially, so I wanted to
target both groups as they aren't subscribed to by the exact same people.
I do agree one list would suffice, though.
--
Asbjørn
: Such issues should, if
they occur, be addressed on the CSS mailing list.
I think this could improve both the HTML and CSS specifications
significantly. Please share your thoughts.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
, which doesn't have its own element.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
. The
discussion is then how this should be enabled, and my proposal is with
!DOCTYPE html.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
because it's
already coded so that a single piece of code handles both cases. But
everything that does a browser check and forks will suddenly fail. And
I think we all know that the vast majority of scripts out there aren't
sensibly coded.
Exactly. IE needs a new DOM.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg
://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
by saying that if there is an xml:base in scope,
then base is ignored for the whole document.
That's also a solution, yea.
A quick test with Firefox shows that xml:base is applied but base
seems to be ignored in application/xhtml+xml documents.
Sounds like good behaviour.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg
that if there is an xml:base in scope,
then base is ignored for the whole document.
That's also a solution, yea.
A quick test with Firefox shows that xml:base is applied but base
seems to be ignored in application/xhtml+xml documents.
Sounds like good behaviour.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http
, plus the fact that several members of
WHAT WG (including myself) are now members of the HTML WG, don't you think
it's possible for us to bring forward this idea and get Mr. Wilson to
notice? It's at least worth a shot, imo.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's
).
Exactly.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
/
?
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
why !DOCTYPE html can be
[1] http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=287660
[2] Of the top 200 US web sites. I do not, however, think this number is
unrepresentative for the web as a whole.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet
.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
:
http://atompub.org/rfc4287.html#schema
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
in Microsoft, then it's not really that surprising that
their products end up like they do. Including Internet Explorer.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
it points to
several different elements. A click event against the label now triggers
focus() on the target element. What is supposed to happen in your use case?
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
.
Yea, true. It's implemented according to best practice and
recommendations, though, so this shouldn't break anything.
There is of course little wrong with that.
Exactly.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
. I'd vote for 'scope', though.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
replies
to this wonderful idea, though! :-P
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
that Internet Explorer will support that for a long time,
and since HTML5 is backward compatible with HTML4, the HTML5 DOCTYPE might
be a much better option.
So, what do you think?
___
[1]
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?oid=dc16aa88896b39b6rurl=video.yahoo.com
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg
, but the
discussion faded kind of quick so I would like to bring it up again.
1. With the possible values of '*' (resets the inheritance and cascade of
all properties) and all CSS property values defined in CSS1+2+3.
2. Not sure which values this property should have yet.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg
require all
anonymous comments to be placed within an iframe. For 100 anonymous
comments, that's 100 iframes on a single web page. Don't tell me that's an
elegant solution.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
something lacking in CSS and something that
indeed should be proposed to the CSS WG.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
discussed before, I'm sorry; I
don't read this list regularly -- it's much too crowded for that.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
39 matches
Mail list logo
