Re: [whatwg] JavaScript function for closing tags

We could specify that WebVTT cues of type metadata should contain valid JSON - that would make sense to me. Cues of type captions or subtitles stupid get parsed dune by the addCue() function of the texttrack API - but not all browsers implement this yet. Would be worth registering bugs on

Re: [whatwg] JavaScript function for closing tags

Hi Michael, It seems to me that the TextTrack API is made for this use case. Why does it not work for you? Cheers, Silvia. On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michael A. Peters wrote: > There does not seem to be a JavaScript API for closing open tags. > > This is

Re: [whatwg] metadata

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Kevin Marks wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Andy Valencia > wrote: >> === Dynamic versus static metadata >> >> Pretty much all audio formats have at least one metadata format. While >> some apparently

Re: [whatwg] Removing mediagroup/MediaController from HTML

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of > >> is removal really the right thing to do, given that we have an >> implementation? > > I agree this is a problematic question. I opened >

Re: [whatwg] Persistent and temporary storage

On 15 Mar 2015 03:35, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 Mar 2015 05:49, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: Users install a relatively small number of apps, and the uninstall flow (which

Re: [whatwg] Persistent and temporary storage

On 14 Mar 2015 05:49, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Janusz Majnert j.majn...@samsung.com wrote: On 13.03.2015 13:50, Anne van Kesteren wrote: A big gap with native is dependable storage for applications. I started sketching the problem space on

Re: [whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote: On 10/27/2014 08:43 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 23

Re: [whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote: On 11/03/2014 04:20 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote: Right, that was the original concern. But how realistic is the situation of n video tracks and m

Re: [whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: [whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, In the Inband Text Tracks Community Group we've recently had a discussion about a proposal by HbbTV. I'd like to bring it up

Re: [whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Bob Lund b.l...@cablelabs.com wrote: On 10/22/14, 9:01 AM, Philip Jägenstedt phil...@opera.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, In the Inband Text Tracks Community Group we've recently had

Re: [whatwg] Gapless playback problems with web audio standards

Have you tried media source extensions? Best Regards, Silvia. On 26 Oct 2014 00:30, David Kendal m...@dpk.io wrote: Hi, http://w3.org/mid/10b10a1d-8b84-4015-8d49-a45b87e4b...@dpk.io dpk

[whatwg] How to expose caption tracks without TextTrackCues

Hi all, In the Inband Text Tracks Community Group we've recently had a discussion about a proposal by HbbTV. I'd like to bring it up here to get some opinions on how to resolve the issue. (The discussion thread is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-inbandtracks/2014Sep/0008.html , but

Re: [whatwg] Adding a property to navigator for getting device model

On 3 Oct 2014 14:25, eberhard speer jr. ses...@ducis.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Maybe you missed my initial message : I am a contributor [IPMC] to the Apache DeviceMap Project. [http://incubator.apache.org/devicemap/] DeviceMap does expert UA-sniffing

Re: [whatwg] Adding a property to navigator for getting device model

On 3 Oct 2014 04:45, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, at 04:39, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, at 19:43, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Mounir Lamouri

Re: [whatwg] Adding a property to navigator for getting device model

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, at 15:01, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, at

Re: [whatwg] Adding a property to navigator for getting device model

On 24 Sep 2014 20:40, James Graham ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk wrote: On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote: In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to enable websites to get the same information from there as is already available in the UA string. That would at least

Re: [whatwg] (no subject)

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:17 PM, javascr...@riseup.net wrote: On 9/12/14, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: What I'd you're a long way away from any medical help? What? s/I'd/if/ (sorry - mobile keyboard) In my mind this is part of the larger drive of the web

Re: [whatwg] Web API for Health Sensors

I believe a way to directly read health data into web apps with a browser api (JavaScript) is an interesting idea. You could then have a webrtc video conference with your doctor and he could read out your pulse and other health data directly from your device live and give you an opinion. Seeing as

Re: [whatwg] Web API for Health Sensors

Browsers have been dealing with private personal data for a while now, that includes video camera microphone input, geolocation and more. Health data isn't so different in that respect. There are mechanisms to deal with privacy already in the browser. But indeed: a spec would need to consider

Re: [whatwg] Web API for Health Sensors

del...@segonquart.net twitter: delfinramirez IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart http://segonquart.net http://delfiramirez.info On 2014-09-13 00:52, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Browsers have been dealing with private personal data for a while now, that includes video camera microphone

Re: [whatwg] Web API for Health Sensors

general web technology nerds? On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: Browsers have been dealing with private personal data for a while now, that includes video camera microphone input, geolocation and more. Health data isn't so different

Re: [whatwg] Canvas-Only Document Type

Has anyone considered the accessibility implications of this? IIUC accessibility for canvas is provided through extra dom elements. So, this would defeat that purpose. Silvia. On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Brian M. Blakely anewpage.me...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ashley, With the budding of

Re: [whatwg] HTTP status code from JavaScript

Hi Michael, On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Michael Heuberger michael.heuber...@binarykitchen.com wrote: Hi David Interesting. Yes and no, I agree with some. See my comments below: On 25/05/14 06:53, David Bruant wrote: Le 23/05/2014 10:04, Michael Heuberger a écrit : - Display a

Re: [whatwg] HTTP status code from JavaScript

You might want to review http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ . In particular: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Is_there_a_process_for_adding_new_features_to_a_specification.3F HTH, Silvia. On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Michael Heuberger michael.heuber...@binarykitchen.com wrote: Hi Jasper

Re: [whatwg] HTTP status code from JavaScript

I had to deal with this on a script created IMG element the other day. I used onerror to deal with it. For xmlhttprequest you can use the status field. Why is that not enough? Silvia. On 23 May 2014 18:06, Michael Heuberger michael.heuber...@binarykitchen.com wrote: Good points Mat In

Re: [whatwg] Question on HTML5 media element, the seeking algorithm and the seeked event

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Andres Gomez wrote: because of my recent work related to a bug and test in WebKit, I've gotten to deal with the HTML5 media element's seeking algorithm and seeked event. During my analysis I was unable,

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

On 13 Nov 2013 11:33, Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote: On 13.11.2013 2:56, Christian Biesinger wrote: For a bit more presentation, and while we're inventing new syntax anyway, how about this: style @media (min-width: 480px) { .artdirected { content: replaced url(attr(src-small));

Re: [whatwg] imgset responsive imgs proposition (Re: The src-N proposal)

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Christian Biesinger cbiesin...@google.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote: What I don't like about CSS approaches is the fact that changing the source of an image is fundamentally different from changing a dimension or

Re: [whatwg] Reconsidering how we deal with text track cues

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: As we continue to evolve the functionality of text tracks, we

Re: [whatwg] Should video controls generate click events?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: The problem was this: if you want to do something when a user clicks on a video but not when the user interacts with the native controls, you're basically out of luck. No, you can do as you do below: you can define an

Re: [whatwg] Should video controls generate click events?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote: Hi, [W]e do want users to be able to bring up the native controls via a context menu and be able to use them regardless of what the page does in its event handlers. So, I request that the spec be explicit that

Re: [whatwg] Should video controls generate click events?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO, the example that Philip provided in http://people.opera.com/~** philipj/click.html http://people.opera.com/~philipj/click.html

Re: [whatwg] Should video controls generate click events?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Bob Lund b.l...@cablelabs.com wrote: On 8/20/13 4:46 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff

Re: [whatwg] Should video controls generate click events?

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: [whatwg] Forms-related feedback

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: Ian, has *any* implementer expressed a preference for implementing a picker which allows selecting date+time+timezone? I.e. one that returns UTC

Re: [whatwg] Forms-related feedback

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: I actually think we need to distinguish between local and floating time zones. When using datetime-local, I would actually expect that the browser picks the local timezone

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: createImageBitmap should return a Promise instead of using a callback

...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: In this case you did remove the non-promise based approach - presumably because it has not been implemented in browsers yet, which is fair enough for browsers. Right. However, for JS developers it means that if they want to use

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: createImageBitmap should return a Promise instead of using a callback

On 18 Jul 2013 07:08, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Justin Novosad wrote: I was about to launch the implementation of window.createImageBitmap in Blink, and I received feedback on the blink-dev mailing list that the Promise API is the wave of the future for

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: createImageBitmap should return a Promise instead of using a callback

On 18 Jul 2013 07:57, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: There are basically two styles: - constructors (new Date(), new Function(), etc) - factory methods on the parent object (document.createElement

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: createImageBitmap should return a Promise instead of using a callback

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Justin Novosad wrote: On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: At the same time, I think we should follow a clear pattern

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: createImageBitmap should return a Promise instead of using a callback

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: We have the same issues with WebRTC, which already has a callback based API, but there is a suggestion to replace/augment with a Promise based API, so I just wanted to understand

Re: [whatwg] Reconsidering how we deal with text track cues

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: As we continue to evolve the functionality of text tracks, we will introduce more complex other structured content into cues and we will want browsers to parse and interpret them. I

Re: [whatwg] Reconsidering how we deal with text track cues

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Brendan Long s...@brendanlong.com wrote: On 06/17/2013 12:41 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Why VTTCaptionCue and not just HTMLCue? It seems like any cue that can be rendered needs to be able to provide its content as HTML, and once we have that, the browser

[whatwg] Reconsidering how we deal with text track cues

Hi all, The model in which we have looked at text tracks (track element of media elements) thus far has some issues that I would like to point out in this email and I would like to suggest a new way to look at tracks. This will result in changes to the HTML and WebVTT specs and has an influence

Re: [whatwg] Pull requests for HTML5 spec?

You can make pull requests for the master branch for https://github.com/w3c/html , which will end up in the HTML5.1 spec [1]. Patches to the CR branch end up in the HTML5.0 spec [2] if accepted. For anything that's more than editorial, register a bug on

Re: [whatwg] Forced subtitles

subtitle should be the language specified of the page or video. But, if a specific subtitle language is told to the browser it should use that. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Eric Carlson eric.carl...@apple.com wrote: On Apr 11, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com

Re: [whatwg] Forced subtitles

I think Eric is right - we need a new @kind=forced or @kind=forcedSubtitles value on track elements, because they behave differently from the subtitle kind: * are not listed in a track menu * are turned on by browser when no other subtitle or caption track is on * multiple forced subtitles tracks

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: channel attribute on HTMLMediaElement

These all sound like important use cases. What I am reading is that there is a need to manage mute state override, playback state management based on browser state, and latency management (some sort of urgency measure). Is there a reason that you have munged these into a single attribute? I am

Re: [whatwg] Hide placeholder on input controls on focus

On 23 Mar 2013 10:00, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote: On 22 Mar 2013 at 22:32, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote: I start typing after I read the placeholder. Hiding placeholder text just because I focused the input is wrong; I may not have read it yet. You shouldn't start

Re: [whatwg] use of article to markup comments

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote: Bruce Lawson bru...@opera.com schrieb am Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:30:18 -: In short, why should the spec suggest any specific method of marking up comments? As someone who is interested in

Re: [whatwg] Is main now an official HTML5 element?

I will try to determine what topic belongs to which group in the future. The simple answer is: have your discussion wherever you feel comfortable to have it. Even if the specs differ, in the end what matters is what browsers implement. If a discussion about a topic is more appropriate in a

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: All of this has already been discussed on this mailing list, so this is not new information. I would please refer you to the earlier messages on this topic. In general, unless there is substantial new information, please don't

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: [..] On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: I personally think main would be useful. I don't think it has a huge benefit, but it has modest benefits, like aside, header, footer and section. I also think the

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: But we already have this. The main content is whatever content isn't marked up as not being main content (anything not marked up with header, aside, nav, etc). I tried

Re: [whatwg] Feature Request: Media Elements as Targets for Links

Can you provide an example markup and an example URL that you think will solve your use case? I'm asking because we don't use the name attribute any more in HTML5, because we have the id attribute on all elements. Thus, it is always possible to hyperlink directly to a video element using a hash

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Tim Leverett ...@gmail.com wrote: Con: Adding a main element adds redundancy to the [role=main] attribute. I don't see why this is a con, if main is mapped to role=main in the browser it means that authors won't have to. Also adding aside/article/footer

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 15 November 2012 19:20, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Tim Leverett ...@gmail.com wrote: Con: Adding a main element adds redundancy to the [role=main

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

approach to finding the main content of a document would still be necessary with or without the main element. ☺ On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Tim Leverett ...@gmail.com wrote: Explicit author markup

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tim Leverett ...@gmail.com wrote: Are you fundamentally distrusting the author in all semantic markup? In some circumstances, yes. Most of the work I've done so far has been in environments where programmers write code, and editors write content.

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

and evaluation algorithm. I'm sure a lot of other people had to solve this problem as well and have done so in their own special way. Explicit author markup would make such a task so much easier. Regards, Silvia. On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Tim Leverett ...@gmail.com wrote: Explicit author markup would make such a task so much easier. Only if every author marked up their code correctly. If some authors use incorrect markup, then an algorithm would still be necessary for determining if each

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Jens O. Meiert j...@meiert.com wrote: Should main be optional or required? I’d deem an optional main to be nonsense because it suggests documents are inherently without goal, or focus. I’d deem a required main to be nonsense because we already have an

Re: [whatwg] Sortable Tables

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote: On 6.11.2012 23:18, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: * data-type: date, number, text etc which determines the comparison function used in sort It would be very difficult to support sorting on dates and numbers as in HTML

Re: [whatwg] A plea to Hixie to adopt main

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote: Am 07.11.2012 15:48 schrieb Jukka K. Korpela: I suppose that the heuristics would include recognizing a div element to which class main has been assigned. Then one could argue that main is not needed, as authors can keep

Re: [whatwg] Sortable Tables

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote: On 11/6/12 11:39 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote: This is a use-case that I absolutely think it makes sense to address. Agreed. Not that I can commit to implementing, necessarily, but I do think this is a common want. Great to

Re: [whatwg] video feedback

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Jer Noble jer.no...@apple.com wrote: On Sep 17, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, adam k wrote: i have a 25fps video, h264, with a burned in timecode. it seems to be off by 1 frame when i compare the burned in timecode to

Re: [whatwg] New URL Standard

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote: On 25/09/2012 01:07 , Glenn Maynard wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote: I suggest just making it a map from String-[String]. You probably want a little bit of magic - if the

[whatwg] exposing metadata on replaced elements (was: video feedback)

Hi Ralph, all, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Ralph Giles wrote: Recently, we've been considering adding a 'tags' or 'metadata' attribute to HTML media elements in Firefox, to allow webcontent access to metadata from the playing media resource. In particular we're interested in tag data like creator,

Re: [whatwg] Problem in the Section 4 Elements of HTML = 4.4 Sections = 4.4.2 The Section element

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: And I suppose by weird formation you mean the example that starts with !DOCTYPE Html Html Head Title Graduation Ceremony Summer

Re: [whatwg] Missing alt attribute name bikeshedding (was Re: alt= and the meta name=generator exception)

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: We briefly brainstormed some ideas on #whatwg earlier tonight, and one name in particular that I think could work is the absurdly long img src=...

Re: [whatwg] Comments about the track element

Hi Cyril, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: What do you mean here by positioning issues? SVG handles the positioning within its viewbox and what I propose is to define the size and position of this viewbox in the parent coordinate

Re: [whatwg] Comments about the track element

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Right now it is fully defined how data in a TextTrack (of the defined kinds) is displayed on top of the video. As this is as yet unclear for SVG resources, I wouldn't say it's unclear, I'd say it

Re: [whatwg] Comments about the track element

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Hi Silvia, Le 7/25/2012 3:42 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Henri Sivonenhsivo...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff

Re: [whatwg] Comments about the track element

Expanding a bit on what Anne said... On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Cyril Concolato cyril.concol...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote: Dear WhatWG, During the ongoing SVG F2F meeting, the SVG WG discussed the use case of displaying SVG graphics on top of a video, in a synchronous manner. The

Re: [whatwg] Why does CanvasRenderingContext2D.drawImage not draw a video's poster?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: On 7/17/2012 11:06 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Mark Callow callow_m...@hicorp.co.jp wrote: On 18/07/2012 00:17

Re: [whatwg] Why does CanvasRenderingContext2D.drawImage not draw a video's poster?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: On Jul 17, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Mark Callow callow_m...@hicorp.co.jp wrote: On 18/07/2012 00:17, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: I think this is simply an idea that hasn't been raised before. I like it. Though even then sometimes

Re: [whatwg] Why does CanvasRenderingContext2D.drawImage not draw a video's poster?

I think this is simply an idea that hasn't been raised before. I like it. Though even then sometimes there may be nothing when there is no explicit poster and preload is set to none. Regards, Silvia. On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Mark Callow callow_m...@hicorp.co.jp wrote: The spec. for

Re: [whatwg] frame accuracy breaking case for 25fps / status of 29.97fps

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote: On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:46:20 +0200, adam k li...@inconduit.com wrote: i have a 25fps video, h264, with a burned in timecode. it seems to be off by 1 frame when i compare the burned in timecode to the calculated

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for HTML5: Motion sensing input device (Kinect, SoftKinetic, Asus Xtion)

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote: The ability to capture sound and video from the user's devices and manipulate it in the page is already being exposed by the getUserMedia

Re: [whatwg] make video always focusable and interactive content

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Chris Double chris.dou...@double.co.nz wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: They are in Opera. The spec allows it. Yes, thankfully one browser has video keyboard interaction. I just tested Firefox

[whatwg] make video always focusable and interactive content

Hi all, I recently experimented with keyboard accessibility of media elements. I found that browsers don't provide a default tabfocus on media elements nor do they provide keyboard interactivity. I had to put explicit @tabindex attributes onto the media elements to allow them to at least receive

Re: [whatwg] make video always focusable and interactive content

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:43:20 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I recently experimented with keyboard accessibility of media elements. I found that browsers don't provide a default tabfocus

Re: [whatwg] metadata attribute for media

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Ralph Giles gi...@mozilla.com wrote: Recently, we've been considering adding a 'tags' or 'metadata' attribute to HTML media elements in Firefox, to allow webcontent access to metadata from the playing media resource. In particular we're interested in tag data

Re: [whatwg] tabindexscope

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Ojan Vafai wrote: We keep running into the use case where the physical position matters for the

Re: [whatwg] tabindexscope

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Can you give some examples of real-world pages where the tabindex attribute has been used (with difficulty due to the lack of scoping), where nav-index is not the right solution

Re: [whatwg] tabindexscope

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Can you give some examples of real-world pages where the tabindex attribute has been used

Re: [whatwg] sources in video by quality as well as codec

I believe right now there are two proposals under discussion that are trying to address the adaptive streaming issues: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/streams/StreamProcessing.html and http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/media-source/media-source.html I believe both are still

Re: [whatwg] Correcting some misconceptions about Responsive Images

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Bruce Lawson bru...@opera.com wrote: On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:16:52 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:  I believe the CG rules would not allow an employee of a W3C Member company to be a free agent though. It appears not. I tried to join the

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 16, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Wilcox m...@matthewwilcox.com wrote: Chalk me up as another making that mistake. Properties

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Kornel Lesiński kor...@geekhood.net wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2012 02:29:11 +0100, Jacob Mather jmat...@itsmajax.com wrote: As I said, I understand that it is a hard problem, but the question is, is it the correct problem. There are plenty of reasons not to do

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Matthew Wilcox m...@matthewwilcox.com wrote: Chalk me up as another making that mistake. Properties on elements usually describe a property of the element. Not a property of something else (like the viewport). If it does indeed rely on a rendering issue (like

Re: [whatwg] So if media-queries aren't for determining the media to be used what are they for?

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote: Andy Davies dajdav...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at the srcset proposal it appears to be recreating aspects of media-queries in a terse less obvious form... We've already got media queries so surelt we should be using

Re: [whatwg] So if media-queries aren't for determining the media to be used what are they for?

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote: Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com skreiv Wed, 16 May 2012 00:57:48 +0200 Media queries come from the client side. They allow the author of a web page to tell exactly how she want to lay out her design based

Re: [whatwg] Considering a lang- attribute prefix for machine translation and intelligibility

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote: There has been some discussion on the w3c/whatwg mailing lists about how far we can mark up content with linguistic tags, such as marking word and/or sentence boundaries. In my authoring of web apps, I often write a

Re: [whatwg] On implementing videos with multiple tracks in HTML5

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: Three issues I have taken out of this discussion that I think are still open to discuss and potentially define in the spec: * How to expose in-band extra audio and video tracks from

Re: [whatwg] Encoding Sniffing

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: Hey, This morning I looked into what it would take to define Encoding Sniffing. http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Encoding#Sniffing has links as to what I looked at (minus Opera internal). As far as I can tell Gecko has the

Re: [whatwg] sources in video by quality as well as codec

I'd be curious what you think about the proposal at http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Video_Metrics which is being addressed through bugs https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14970 and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12399 . Regards, Silvia. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM,

Re: [whatwg] sources in video by quality as well as codec

at 4:22 PM, Rodger Combs rodger.co...@gmail.com wrote: While they're useful, I don't see how those bugs add the functions I proposed. Am I missing something, or are you just asking for input on a related topic? If so, I think those seem pretty nice. On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r6895 - [ac] (0) Tweak hidden='''s definition a bit to be more consistent with likely us [...]

Could we add video to the list of aria-describedby elements that may link to hidden text? i.e. change ..being referenced from the images that they describe to ..being referenced from the images or videos that they describe ? IMO that would resolve several of the accessibility issues for the

  1   2   3   4   5   >