Mihai Sucan wrote:
For Youtube, a site which provides bloggers an easy way to integrate
videos, this would prove even ... hard. Here's the simple code users
have to copy/paste:
object width=425 height=350
param name=movie value=http://www.youtube.com/v/id;/param
param name=wmode
Le Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:30:34 +0200, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:07:20 -, Mihai Sucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If video elements would have native UIs, bloggers would be more
attracted of it, and developers of video sites as well. In the above
Le Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:06:51 +0200, Alexey Feldgendler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:07:20 +0100, Mihai Sucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3. Personally, I believe the native UI should opt-out, not opt-in.
video element implementations should not be required to implement
Le Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:44:08 +0200, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Intriguing. My uneducated guess would be that YouTube would prefer to
stick to Flash, since it's probably harder to strip branding out of
Flash than any XML format.
I don't believe the current video
Martin Atkins wrote:
Mihai Sucan wrote:
For Youtube, a site which provides bloggers an easy way to integrate
videos, this would prove even ... hard. Here's the simple code users
have to copy/paste:
object width=425 height=350
param name=movie value=http://www.youtube.com/v/id;/param
param
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:07:20 -, Mihai Sucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If video elements would have native UIs, bloggers would be more
attracted of it, and developers of video sites as well. In the above
case, you'd only have:
video src=http://www.youtube.com/v/id;
I doubt YouTube
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
I doubt YouTube would allow that. Such video (even with UI provided by
browser) lacks features that YouTube probably would require: branding and
link to their website.
Perhaps. But the current plan seems to be for the second version of
video to support native UIs.
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:07:20 +0100, Mihai Sucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
3. Personally, I believe the native UI should opt-out, not opt-in.
video element implementations should not be required to implement
native UI, however, if authors want to have their own custom UI, then
they must
