Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Custom data attributes are intended to store custom data private to
the page or application, for which there are no more appropriate
attributes or elements. -- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#custom
I'm confused. Are you trying to imply that my suggestion is
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heycam -- see at the end for a request for WebIDL.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Brad Neuberg wrote:
True, but having prototypes on DOM objects can be extremely useful and
provide all sorts of very powerful options. Mozilla allows
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Julian Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
The point was made before that html5 already has extensive
extension mechanisms in place that can address the particular
Hello all, I have many comments on the Offline Web Applications corner of
the HTML5 spec. This is the first round of comments you'll see coming from
me. This one is mostly top-level comments.
5.7.2 Application caches
I found the terminology used to describe the contents of the cache sometimes
Henri Sivonen wrote:
... Since RDF vocabularies use URIs as
identifiers, I find creating more microformats (even if they need more
one-off speccing) a more appealing way forward from the language usage
point of view than importing RDF vocabularies in a generically
mappable way. (I can't see
Ian,
Thanks for the details.
Some questions below.
Ian Hickson wrote:
The Database stuff was mostly driven by requests from large Web
application authors (including, for example, GMail), who wanted to be able
to offer their services even while their users were offline.
I am quite
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Ben Adida wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
The Database stuff was mostly driven by requests from large Web
application authors (including, for example, GMail), who wanted to be
able to offer their services even while their users were offline.
However, it's pretty clear
Technically there was a time/way to tell gecko not to support frames.
There was a time when i played w/ that support while we were
spidering. Browser.frames.enabled / default / boolean / true.
It seems to work as of a nightly from aug 13 (iirc it requires a
restart. I'd suggest using a distinct
For some strange definition of lie. You're defining a lie as ok and
saying it isn't lying.
i still don't see why this is valuable. Can you provide use cases
where you won't harm my users? This probably means setting up a web
page which explains what you're doing and how you're going to fall
back
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Tim Starling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
With this proposal, I'm trying to find a compromise between the opinions
put forward on this list. Personally I'd be happy either way, as long as
the interface gets added in some form.
The yes = maybe definition pre-empts
Ian Hickson wrote:
...
So, just to be clear, how does that link up with SQL-in-browser? When
you say people, do you mean web publishers / application builders?
Users. One of the problems, for instance, was that they could not access
their GMail while offline.
...
So, out of curiosity,
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
...
So, just to be clear, how does that link up with SQL-in-browser? When you
say people, do you mean web publishers / application builders?
Users. One of the problems, for instance, was that they could not access
their
Ian Hickson wrote:
I have no idea what problem RDFa is trying to solve. I have no idea what
the requirements are.
Ian, this is not an official response from the RDF in XHTML Task Force
or the Semantic Web Deployment Workgroup. It is a personal attempt to
outline some of the problems that RDFa
13 matches
Mail list logo
