On 2016-07-14 18:21, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>> From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of
>> i...@hansschmucker.de
>
>> _The remaining issue for me seems that the interaction between this "viewer"
>> and the page is completely unspecified and that items like descriptions and
>> copyright notices which may be required to make sense of an image may or may
>> not be shown._
>>
>> _ Also, an image may represent an item of any kind or offer actions on it
>> (for example "Download the PDF", "View the subgallery", "Show related
>> images", "Go to full description"), which the page may be unable to perform
>> if there is no standardized way to interact with the UA._
>
> I don't think the below proposal is a good way to address this. I'd suggest
> creating your own library to implement the desired functionality, possibly
> using microformats for the semantic aspects, and seeing if it gets adoption.
> If it becomes very popular, maybe we could consider asking implementers if
> they are interested in adding it to the platform, like they have done with
> aspects of other popular libraries such as jQuery. But I think you are still
> too quick to jump to asking implementers to implement a new element.
agree
---
Delfi Ramirez -- At Work
My digital signature [1]
0034 633 589231
del...@segonquart.net [2]
twitter: @delfinramirez [3]
IRC: segonquart
Skype: segonquart [4]
http://segonquart.net
http://delfiramirez.info
[5]
Links:
--
[1] http://delfiramirez.info/public/dr_public_key.asc
[2] mail:%20del...@segonquart.net
[3] https://twitter.com/delfinramirez
[4] skype:segonquart
[5] http://delfiramirez.info
