stevertigo wrote:
Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I believe you are misreading what is said here. It is not being stated
that Arbcom has no time to do the job. Rather, it is being stated that
if it wants to do the job, it doesn't also have the time to deal with
all
Ray Saintonge wrote:
stevertigo wrote:
More thing on my to-do list: Get Arbcom to actually deal with
adjudicating policy and sections therein.
That can't work without opening up the broader question of how policies
are formulated and later amended. Any kind of policy review
2009/9/28 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
OK, here's an old-style formulation: X is to current policy and
policy-review discussions as RfAr is to the Workshop. What would X be?
That's probably horribly accurate, considering the arbcom tends -
fairly reasonably - to regard
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
That's probably horribly accurate, considering the arbcom tends -
fairly reasonably - to regard the workshops as somewhere annoying
people go to be ignored ...
I know. AGF, srsly.
-Stevertigo
___
WikiEN-l
