Salut Benoit,
On 2015-08-07 09:14, Ben Salvidrim wrote:
BASC is intended to be a venue to appeal bans specifically and not blocks, but it still
sometimes responds to block appeals because an indef-block can be considered a de
facto ban, albeit one that did not require prior community
So in my case, where should I appeal? I was blocked indef.
On Aug 8, 2015 10:43 AM, Ben Salvidrim benoit_lan...@hotmail.com wrote:
BASC is intended to be a venue to appeal bans specifically and not blocks,
but it still sometimes responds to block appeals because an indef-block can
be
BASC is intended to be a venue to appeal bans specifically and not blocks, but
it still sometimes responds to block appeals because an indef-block can be
considered a de facto ban, albeit one that did not require prior community
consensus (or an ArbCom decision).
Since this is not an actual
I am forwarding the last mail promised in
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2015-August/54.html
This is the last mail in the thread on JzG's case (regarding WP:EXPLAINBLOCK
violations). It quotes the 2 other mails in that thread (as well as the
original report).
The only mail
And to add - if he is unblocked under conditions and then he violates
them, I'll be the first to reblock him. It amuses me that I'm pretty
sure I have a reputation for being a harsh blocker, but seem a lot
more willing to work under cases like this - and more than once I've
unblocked people
I will say on the face of it, I'm pretty disappointed at how this
looks. Chealer's block record was not very long - yes, counting JzG's
he received three recent blocks, but there are plenty of people who do
little productive who have worse records. And frankly, two of those
blocks were for
