Hi all!
I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought aboutto procede to the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation
Hi Patrick,
if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
and someone can have an answer to his own questions.
Best Regards
Ilario
On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like
Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't
even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how
long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?) and before the
bylaws are approved, we can forget about making a founding assembly. I
mean, we can
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Patrick,
if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to
organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution
and someone can have an answer to his own questions.
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do
Michael Bimmler wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and
The second reply :)
I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we
had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this
through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like
developers (for board's meeting I know that the physical presence is a
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Bimmler wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the
founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we
can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that
Swiss law
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The second reply :)
Ah, I see.
I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we
had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this
through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like
Michael Bimmler wrote:
The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the
second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating,
... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to
be signed by the protocollist.
Fair enough; even if the physical
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Bimmler wrote:
The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the
second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating,
... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to
be signed
On 3/22/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't
even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how
long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?)
This isn't currently with the Board, so I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
