Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/22/06, Angela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/22/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?)

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Ilario Valdelli
The distance isn't a problem. In the past I was anywhere in Europe in any time for my job (Aachen, Bruxelles, Madrid, etc.), to go from Lugano to Zürich is like to go shopping at closest favourite supermarket ;) But it's logical that if this favourite supermarket is closer than another I'd like

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Patrick Kenel
From:"Ilario Valdelli" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:Mailing list for Wikimedia Swizerland wikimediach-l@Wikipedia.orgTo:"Mailing list for Wikimedia Swizerland" wikimediach-l@wikipedia.orgSubject:Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?Date:Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:54:13 +0100The distanc

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-22 Thread Manuel Schneider [Everything Open]
Patrick, could you please, please deactivate that bloody HTML format in your mails? All mailinglists would be very glad. Thank you, Manuel -- - All-Things-Open Projektgruppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Patrick Kenel
Hi all! I'd like to ask Michael or Nando whether they thought aboutto procede to the foundation of our chapter. The bylaws are getting fixed now, we're establishing a mail address, technical support is clear and the Wikipedia Day is approaching. Back in January, we considered the foundation

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Ilario Valdelli
Hi Patrick, if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution and someone can have an answer to his own questions. Best Regards Ilario On 3/21/06, Patrick Kenel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! I'd like

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?) and before the bylaws are approved, we can forget about making a founding assembly. I mean, we can

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Patrick, if Michael and Nando and all members of this ML agreed, I suggest to organize a meeting room using the IRC channel. It's a simple solution and someone can have an answer to his own questions. I'm not sure what you mean here. Do

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Frederic Schutz
Michael Bimmler wrote: I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that Swiss law requires, that the association is physically founded and

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Ilario Valdelli
The second reply :) I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like developers (for board's meeting I know that the physical presence is a

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Bimmler wrote: I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you propose that we make the founding assembly itself on IRC? Because then, to be very frank, we can forget about this. IANAL but I'm quite sure to have read that Swiss law

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The second reply :) Ah, I see. I means that if someone has some question or we (mailing list) wish we had preliminary meeting to have report status, we can made this through IRC channel. This is a means used also by other groups like

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Frederic Schutz
Michael Bimmler wrote: The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating, ... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to be signed by the protocollist. Fair enough; even if the physical

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Michael Bimmler
On 3/21/06, Frederic Schutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Bimmler wrote: The second point is not so clear on protocol but the first and the second clearly state, that there needs to be a protocol, stating, ... was founded IN (- a physical lieu must be defined) and needs to be signed

Re: [Wikimediach-l] foundation assembly?

2006-03-21 Thread Angela
On 3/22/06, Michael Bimmler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there is a bit of a problem: The ChapCom (or the board, we don't even know this...) is reviewing our bylaws now. We have no idea how long this will take (hint delphine/angela/anthere?) This isn't currently with the Board, so I'm