On 17 September 2012 23:40, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, I have never trusted electoral systems that rely on computers to
the point that the votes go in, a button is pushed, and a black box churns
out a result. I'd be much happier with a system that can if necessary be
+2
On 18 September 2012 08:43, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2012 23:40, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, I have never trusted electoral systems that rely on computers to
the point that the votes go in, a button is pushed, and a black box
churns
Whilst there may be no precise misdemeanor, can we assume that our
charity (Wikimedia UK) follows and applies the Nolan Principles to all
Trustees?
http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/parlment/nolan/nolan.htm
Gordo
___
Therefore
Make it so Jean-Luc Picard
Gordo
On 18/09/12 08:55, Jon Davies wrote:
Indeed - I think it is even mentioned in one of our many governance
documents.
On 18 September 2012 08:52, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com
mailto:gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
Whilst
On 17/09/12 20:34, Chris Keating wrote:
and will provide a firm basis for the growing use of
Wikipedia-linked QR codes in future.
This issue has always been on my mind. The use of a code requires a
method to decode and produce a result. In general terms, QR Codes
resolve to *text* *strings*
On 17/09/12 20:37, Chris Keating wrote:
To further clarify - we are not really talking about intellectual
property rights. We are talking about the domains currently used to
provide the qrpedia service, which are qrpedia.org
http://qrpedia.org and qrwp.org http://qrwp.org.
I like the
On 17/09/12 21:48, Chris Keating wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
mailto:lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Chris, if I may at least ask for a very short clarification of the
no: are you confirming there has been no communication/decision on
Hi all,
The GibraltapeidA issue has raised a number of concerns which have led to
a number of members spending time on the matter, and indeed staff time
will have to spent on clarifying the issues involved as well. While
GibraltapeidA has been the occasion of this discussion, and could well
Hmm, well this is getting Murkier still. Have people violated these
principles.
Someone on Jimbo's talk linked to this article:
http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=25440
Which:
a) Identifies Roger as WMUK director with implication he is acting in
official capacity
b) Says that
On 18 September 2012 03:03, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:26 PM, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.comwrote:
OK, here's a very quick first draft of the motion and election rules for
STV.
On 18 September 2012 09:43, Deryck Chan deryckc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 September 2012 08:50, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
+2
On 18 September 2012 08:43, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2012 23:40, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2012 23:57, Deryck Chan deryckc...@gmail.com wrote:
James,
Should some Directors appointed under these Rules be required, under
Article 16.2, to retire at the next Annual General Meeting, those Directors
shall be those who received the fewest first preferences. In the event
I've located some more information about Geovation now by myself:
https://challenge.geovation.org.uk/a/dtd/119163-16422
Wales Coast Path only: What theme of the challenge does your idea address?:
3. Community engagement What problem are you trying to solve? : Green
tourism: what's around me?
Hi,
The Wikimedia UK Conference Committee is currently considering location
for the 2013 WikiConference UK and AGM. So far we have quotes for the
following locations.
* Birmingham x 1
* Coventry x 1
* Edinburgh x 1
* Lincoln x 1-2
* Manchester x 3
* Oxford x 2-3
Do you consider
Wearing another hat, I'm Chair of Trustees of a local charity that owns a
community interest company (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_interest_company ), and that works
well because the CIC can bid for and take on work that the charity can't.
We reinvest any surplus from the CIC back into
15 matches
Mail list logo
