To add some context to what Robla wrote:
More than a year ago, Kunal's proposal to make the database storage of content
model and format more efficient was approved, but it was never implemented (the
original T105652).
I am concerned that the proposed solution would interfere with the
Hi everyone,
For this week's office hour, we'll be revisiting the 2015 proposal to
change content model storage[1] (see also T105652). The RFC describes
the problems it is solving:
> * The content model and format of a revision is stored as NULL if it
>is the default. This makes changing
