Dmitriy Sintsov (2011-07-29 07:54):
Speaking of server-side (php interface), yes, MediaWiki is largely
backwards compatible (except for static call Linker::link() and few
ancient things, like wfLoadExtensionMessages‎() and so on). Speaking of
client-side (Javascript), it is not so simple.
On 28.07.2011 2:19, Maciej Jaros wrote:
Dmitriy Sintsov (2011-07-21 09:48):
Brion Vibberbr...@pobox.com [Fri, 6 May 2011 16:34:20 -0700]:
This gets a little scarier-looking once it turns out that the core
Parser class has a hojillion little patches on it that the extension
depends on,
I see a pile of bugs on FCK Editor have been resolved invalid
because upstream have declared MediaWiki unsupported.
So what are the current options for WYSIWYG editing, even non-ideal
ones? I believe this leaves none ...
- d.
___
Wikitech-l mailing
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:41 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I see a pile of bugs on FCK Editor have been resolved invalid
because upstream have declared MediaWiki unsupported.
So what are the current options for WYSIWYG editing, even non-ideal
ones? I believe this leaves none ...
Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
Currently I use mw.loader.load(), which can be replaced with
importScriptURI(). However I don't want to go step back then move again
to 1.17/1.18. I've managed to postpone visual editor thing, now I'll
try to adapt few another extensions. I wanted RTE because it handles
* Platonides platoni...@gmail.com [Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:14:32 +0200]:
MediaWiki is largely backwards compatible. An extension designed for
1.15 is very likely to still work in trunk version (even though it may
not get advantage of ResourceLoader, for instance).
There are some core changes that
Dmitriy Sintsov (2011-07-21 09:48):
Brion Vibberbr...@pobox.com [Fri, 6 May 2011 16:34:20 -0700]:
This gets a little scarier-looking once it turns out that the core
Parser class has a hojillion little patches on it that the extension
depends on, which do much of the annotation placeholder
* Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com [Fri, 6 May 2011 16:34:20 -0700]:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble adapting the RTELinker class, which adds
annotation
to some link header structures and removes the table of contents;
now that
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ruwrote:
I've cloned it from
git://gitorious.org/mediawiki-wikia-rte/mediawiki-wikia-rte.git and I am
having huge troubles even getting it to run without fatal errors in
1.17. It seems to require Wikia custom classes and
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
(CC'd inez @ wikia)
In the process of getting a better feel for the current state of Wikia,
Wikihow, a few others' rich text editor tools, I'm going through Wikia's
CKEditor-based RTE extension and seeing if I can get it
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble adapting the RTELinker class, which adds annotation
to some link header structures and removes the table of contents; now that
these base Linker functions have moved to static methods on the Linker
(CC'd inez @ wikia)
In the process of getting a better feel for the current state of Wikia,
Wikihow, a few others' rich text editor tools, I'm going through Wikia's
CKEditor-based RTE extension and seeing if I can get it working on MediaWiki
trunk.
I've got a fork from Wikia's SVN in this
12 matches
Mail list logo
