On 03/31/2014 06:14 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
On 02/26/2014 12:23 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
I have just pushed a new version of the TitleValue patch to Gerrit:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/106517.
I have also updated the RDF to reflect the latest changes:
On 02/26/2014 12:23 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
I have just pushed a new version of the TitleValue patch to Gerrit:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/106517.
I have also updated the RDF to reflect the latest changes:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/TitleValue.
Please have a
I have just pushed a new version of the TitleValue patch to Gerrit:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/106517.
I have also updated the RDF to reflect the latest changes:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/TitleValue.
Please have a look. I have tried to address several issues with
Am 06.02.2014 21:09, schrieb Sumana Harihareswara:
I agree that this mailing list is a reasonable place to discuss the
interfaces.
Notes from the Architecture Summit are now up at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/TitleValue# . At
yesterday's RFC review we agreed that
I agree that this mailing list is a reasonable place to discuss the
interfaces.
Notes from the Architecture Summit are now up at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/TitleValue# . At
yesterday's RFC review we agreed that we'd like to hold another one next
week (will figure out
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.dewrote:
Am 24.01.2014 14:44, schrieb Brad Jorsch (Anomie):
It looks to me like the existing patch *already is* getting too far into
the Javaification, with it's proliferation of classes with single methods
that need to be
Thanks for your input Nik!
I'll add my 2ยข below. Would be great if others could chime in.
I have just pushed a new version of the path, please have a look at
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/106517/
Am 04.02.2014 16:31, schrieb Nikolas Everett:
* Should linking, parsing, and formatting live
At the architecture summit yesterday we had a conversation about the TitleValue
proposal and the vast majority of folks thought it was a great start. Something
like 10% of us thought the patch _might_ be a start down the path to Javaify
MediaWiki. I was one of the 10%.
We resolved to talk
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Nik Everett never...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
At the architecture summit yesterday we had a conversation about the
TitleValue proposal and the vast majority of folks thought it was a great
start. Something like 10% of us thought the patch _might_ be a start down
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Nik Everett never...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
At the architecture summit yesterday we had a conversation about the
TitleValue proposal and the vast majority of folks thought it was a great
start. Something like 10% of us thought the patch _might_ be a start down
Hey,
Java is a technology with strong and weak sides, like any other.
Religiously labeling anything that resembles something from it as evil
because you do not like it is perhaps not the most constructive approach
one can take. That is quite obvious of course. From my vantage point, it
definitely
On 24/01/14 11:19, Nik Everett wrote:
The TitleValue proposal is an improvement over what we have now so I figure
we should just do it. Is that ok?
I am also personally in favour of it, but I would like to achieve
consensus of the MediaWiki core team if possible before continuing.
On
On 24/01/14 15:11, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Java is a technology with strong and weak sides, like any other.
Religiously labeling anything that resembles something from it as evil
because you do not like it is perhaps not the most constructive approach
one can take. That is quite obvious of
Am 24.01.2014 16:15, schrieb Tim Starling: On 24/01/14 15:11, Jeroen De Dauw
wrote:
Daniel proposed an ideal code
architecture as consisting of a non-trivial network of trivial classes
-- a bold and precise vision. Nobody was uncivil or deprecating in
their response.
This idea is something
14 matches
Mail list logo
