On 2013-01-23 3:38 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Suggested solution:
Maybe some kind of voting system might be of use to force some kind of
consensus rather than leaving problems unsolved. I'm fed up of
receiving emails about the same problem I discussed weeks before that
never
On 2013-01-22 3:30 PM, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Luke Welling WMF lwell...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
That was not the end of the problem I was referring to. We know our
specific captcha is broken at turning away machines. As far as I am
aware
we do not
On 2013-01-22 6:05 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I hereby admit defeat. My thread was clearly not the ultimate bikeshed.
Cheers
--
On this bikeshed, allowing both styles sounds perfectly acceptable to me.
-bawolff
___
On 2013-01-22 6:03 PM, Alex Brollo alex.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/22 Paul Selitskas p.selits...@gmail.com
What do you mean by
any wikicode (template call, parameter, link) present into
the value of infobox parameter breaks the stuff, since it is parsed
and
expanded by parser
Good work to everyone involved!
-bawolff
On 2013-01-22 6:53 PM, Ct Woo ct...@wikimedia.org wrote:
All,
The switchover work is done.
The site was was available to readers throughout the migration work though
it was in read-only mode for about 32 minutes, when Asher and Mark had to
migrate
On 2013-01-21 3:56 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 07:48 +, David Gerard wrote:
On 21 January 2013 05:13, Victor Vasiliev vasi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2013 04:22 PM, David Gerard wrote:
The MediaWiki captcha is literally worse than
Given that there are algorithms that can solve our captcha presumably they
are mostly preventing the lazy and those that don't have enough knowledge
to use those algorithims. I would guess that text on an image without any
blurring or manipulation would be just as hard for those sorts of people to
This question is something we've also been asking ourselves on the E3
team,
as part of our work on account creation. I think we all agree that
CAPTCHAs
are at best a necessary evil. They are a compromise we make in our user
experience, in order to combat automated attacks.
That's kind of
There are reports everywhere of uploading new versions of images failing
(upload works but new version does not show up).
Last time this happened all that needed to be done was fot varnishhtcpd to
be restarted on the image cache servers. [1] could someone with the ability
to check, check if that
English is a useless language anyhow. There's not even a compilier for it!
-bawolff
On 2013-01-18 11:49 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
* in case anyone is interested in *
common mistake done by me. One day I will hopefully master english :)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Petr
One thing I would like to see is code from projects being merged into core
at a regular basis instead of just at the end. Obviously that might not be
possible for all projects depending on what your project is, but many that
modify core can be done in incremental steps. I don't know about last
Would it be possible/difficult to get something similar working for
gadgets on WMF wikis?
Helder
What would be really cool would be if the js content handler code detected
code doc comments and formatted them nicely. Something similar to how back
in the old days people used to have things
On 2013-01-16 7:20 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On 17/01/13 00:14, Chad wrote:
Really, I think the whole thread is moot with the pending upgrade.
Typos should always be fixed before merging (I think we
13 matches
Mail list logo
