Re: WebBrowser

2002-10-19 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 19, 2002 11:01 am, Malte Starostik wrote: Hmm, we're implementing the absolutely neccessary parts in reaktivate with Konqueror, but that's run from inside Konq already, so it's a bit special. Maybe there would be a way to use either browser with those interfaces? :-) See...? It's

Re: Listview regression

2002-10-19 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 19, 2002 11:34 am, David D. Hagood wrote: I've just applied/built/installed/tested the U series patches, and I have 2 regressions in the AAA MapNGo program: First, the first column of the directions window (which shows the type of road) is missing. U3 should fix this, please give

Re: Listview regression

2002-10-19 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 19, 2002 11:34 am, David D. Hagood wrote: Second, when I do the Along the way, the program cores out. This one's tricky. Can you please retest (it will still crash), and send me the log, after applying thing patch: --- dlls/comctl32/listview.c.V0 Sat Oct 19 17:49:34 2002 +++

Re: Listview regression

2002-10-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 20, 2002 09:35 am, David D. Hagood wrote: Better, but not all the way. It doesn't crash, and *some* of the items show up in the along the way box, but not all. Please try V4, it should fix it. If not, a trace is appreciated, as always. :) -- Dimi.

Re: WebBrowser

2002-10-20 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 20, 2002 09:26 pm, DanteAliegri wrote: Fwiw, this has already been done in mozilla, and there is documentation on it at http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/control.htm . So depend on how we Indeed. And the *cool* part is that's LGPLed already!!! Way cool! The only problem is that it's

Re: Listview V15

2002-10-21 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 21, 2002 04:20 pm, Bobby Bingham wrote: + * -- LVIS_ACTIVATING (not currently supported my comctl32.dll version 6.0) you mean by comctl32.dll version 6.0 ? ;) indeed. + * -- LVN_BEGINDRAG, LVN_BEGINRDRAG hmmm ... how about LVN_BEGINFRAG, LVN_ENDDRAG How about you read

LVM_* defs

2002-10-21 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Can anyone help me with the definition of these listview messages? TIA. LVM_CANCELEDITLABEL LVM_CREATEDRAGIMAGE LVM_ENABLEGROUPVIEW LVM_GETBKIMAGE LVM_GETGROUPINFO LVM_GETGROUPMETRICS LVM_GETINSERTMARK LVM_GETINSERTMARKCOLOR LVM_GETINSERTMARKRECT LVM_GETOUTLINECOLOR LVM_GETSELECTEDCOLUMN

Third listview status update

2002-10-21 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Folks, With my latest W-series patches, the listview should now be a pleasure to work with: fast, *no* flicker, etc. It should be a lot better than before I started working on it. If this is not the case (there are regressions, there is nasty flicker *anywhere*, it's slow, or in general it's not

Re: An RPC progress report

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 02:50 pm, Greg Turner wrote: Now, what remains to be done? Well, as Ove mentions in the TODO for his units, a whole lot. Here are several things in no particular order: And this nice summary should be placed in a file header somewhere in the RPC code, so that other

Re: updated dlls/comctl32/commctrl.c comments

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 03:02 pm, Christian Neumair wrote: Dimitrie started posting a header doc patch for listview.c, so I got motivated and wrote the same thing for commctrl.c. I hope it's complete. Thanks, Chris. In many respects, this is more important than code. For many reasons I will not go

Re: [RFC] Adding an include/wine/wine directory?

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 07:12 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: decide on the final structure. (And my secret hope is that by then we will be able to switch to Subversion which should make renaming files a lot easier; but that's another topic...) Oh my, you think it's going to take us _that_ long?!?

Re: Third listview status update

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 06:16 am, Rein Klazes wrote: On the positive side background colouring for new messages works now. ;) [snip] - updates are from bottom to top; this gets some getting used to; Fixed in one of the W-patches. Crash 2: | err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x4fcf28

Re: Third listview status update

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 11:45 pm, Rein Klazes wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:38:41 -0400, you wrote: The line numbers look strage. What version of dlls/comctl32/comctl32undoc.c did you run it with? rev 1.71, latest cvs. Interesting. Listen, can you please retry with _all_ my latest patches,

Re: Third listview status update

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 06:16 am, Rein Klazes wrote: - the green background extends as far as the text; with native comctl32 is extends the whole column; - A line that has both a green background and is marked slected will display as white text on green backgound; With native comctl32 is shows as

Re: Treeview fix

2002-10-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 23, 2002 12:44 am, Jeff Smith wrote: I discovered treeview uses DSA's and Dimi recently changed the max element number in DSA's to 0x7fff (SHRT_MAX). Note this value has the special meaning in DSA_InsertPtr functions of 'add new element to end of array'. This was my initial

Re: Services

2002-10-23 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 12:24 pm, Martin Wilck wrote: The fact that wine cannot change user personalities and is lacking most of the NT security concepts makes services pretty useless. I was thinking, can't we somehow use stuff like sudo(8) to accomplish that? I personally haven't used sudo(8), but

Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Folks, After my latest X-series patches (currently at X6), I am aware of the following listview bugs: Yes, you read correctly: NONE. :) So I ask you for one of two things: -- bug reports or -- success stories Otherwise, I'm gonna declare listview the coolest, nicest, most huggable piece

Re: Third listview status update

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 06:16 am, Rein Klazes wrote: - only first column displays text; this problem existed from the beginning; OK, X5 + X6 should fix this. Newsbin Pro is just perfect now :) -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 06:48 am, Francois Gouget wrote: Hmm, one more thing actually: WinZip crashes on exit and this crash goes `away if I restore the old comctl32 library... Can you reproduce the crash or should I send you a log? Yes, please, always send me a log :) -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 06:43 am, Francois Gouget wrote: * if I resize the 'Type' column there is a lot of flicker in the first column. Now there are some things to be said about that: - since this changes the width of the first column it seems unavoidable to redraw it (unless we keep its

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 03:25 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: Possible. I found an easier way to reproduce: just start notepad.exe, Go to the file open dialog, and put it in 'Details' mode. Then you get a header and can play with the column widths. That's right. If that's the same bug as 1091 it may

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 03:01 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: It happened when I moved the left edge of the 'Type' column. This resizes the first column and moves all the other columns. I retested with X7 to confirm that the issue is still there and noticed that similar redraw issues occurred when I

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 03:01 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: I retested with X7 and the flicker is gone :-) You are too kind! Most of it (but not all), at least it's gone ... :) However, it breaks right aligned, and centered columns, X11 fixes that. For those, we can't do without the flicker, sorry

Re: eTax status report

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 22, 2002 08:01 pm, Ben Stanley wrote: Hi, I have now completed using the eTax program from the Australian Taxation Office (http://etax.ato.gov.au) under wine, and have some concluding remarks. Excellent -- you should add it to the apps database! -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 07:34 am, Rein Klazes wrote: - resizing the columns (funny some of them, not all) looses the green background colour. Fixed by X8-11. Give it a spin. -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-24 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 07:34 am, Rein Klazes wrote: - Updating/refreshing the messages listview (when downloading headers) is far less efficient then with native comctl32. The whole listview gets refreshed instad of just the visible update. This is especially noticable when the updates are not in

Re: Listview Z0 (roll-up patch)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 07:38 am, David D. Hagood wrote: For those of us who are a little behind on the patches, would it be possible to get a roll-up patch of all diffs from the CVS MAIN branch? Also, what is the status of CVS vs. the patches - what patches have been applied? The algorithm has

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 02:36 am, Greg Turner wrote: So, I know this has been discussed before... but I can't recall: is native (W98) regedit expected to work right now? For me, it doesn't. It's better with the latest CVS than yesterday (died on an assertion), but now it's back to blank. The

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 11:34 am, Rein Klazes wrote: It is a bit too much. The flashing is gone, great. But when the message listview is filled and the display updates, of the perhaps 10 new items that are added to the bottom only the last 2 or 3 are displayed. That leaves white gaps in the

Re: Resubmitted - Prefereable GetDateFormatW fix

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 12:39 pm, Medland, Bill wrote: (Sorry Dimi; it has to be an attachment to stop the mailer wrapping it) No, it doesn't, as long as you set up your mail to not wrap. Or, alternatively, just add it as text/plain, so it is displayed inline. But actually inlining it is better,

Re: Listview Z0 (roll-up patch)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 02:55 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: Hmmm, what happened to the Y series? Doh! Now the cat is out of the bag: I don't know my alphabet!!! Oh, man... Y: Y use Y? -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 03:24 pm, Rein Klazes wrote: Now it is visually back to the situation before X12, lots of flickering. I beg to differ. I've tried it, and it *sometimes* flickers *once* (that is, at the end of the download, it refreshes again, even if it shouldn't). Problem is, that the

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 02:33 pm, Jeff Smith wrote: Now (12 hours ago anyways) it is always blank. When I click on where the values should be (highlight them), sometimes they will show up then. It seems something is not being refreshed that should be. Try Z5 -- hopefully it should fix it. --

Re: Changes in Bitmap behaviour

2002-10-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 12, 2002 01:29 pm, Duane Clark wrote: I found that the patch that broke it was one of the comctrl patches of 9/11/02. I think it was this one: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2002/09/0067.html I thought that was the case, but I can not reproduce it here Can you try the

Re: a very unimportant listview nit

2002-10-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 12, 2002 08:10 pm, Greg Turner wrote: gcc3.2 tells me this is depreciated label at end of compount statement. IOW, I presume it wants a break; after the default: label. Thanks, will fix. -- Dimi.

Re: wine/dlls/comctl32 listview.c

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 2, 2002 10:39 pm, Ender wrote: expecially IDA Pro (the Windows GUI version), which exibits at least two problems... the Names window doesn't show the description column text, and neither the Names or Strings window listboxes are clickable.. usually you'd double-click to jump to a

Re: wine/dlls/comctl32 listview.c

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 2, 2002 10:39 pm, Ender wrote: coming in.. for the last few days Listviews have been pretty much totally broken in most of the applications I frequently run under WINE - expecially IDA Pro (the Windows GUI version), which exibits at least two problems... the Names window doesn't

winedbg

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Hi folks, Even though I never use a debugger, I had winedbg startup automatically a few times, and I noticed that I get no text in the console. Actually, I do (as I can select it and copy it), but it doesn't get rendered. I tried changing the font, but the only option I get is Courier New. Tried

Re: winedbg

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 17, 2002 04:43 pm, Uwe Bonnes wrote: Look at the [Software\\Wine\\WineDbg] section in ~/.wine/system.reg. With ConChannelMask=dword:0001 output should to the wineconsole. I do not have such an entry in system.reg. Is it required? I've tried to add it, didn't make a difference. Do

Re: winedbg

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 17, 2002 04:23 pm, Eric Pouech wrote: can you send me a -debugmsg +wineconsole,+wc_font trace TIA Sure, I run it like this: [dimidimi wine.src]$ ../wine/programs/winedbg/winedbg --debugmsg +wineconsole,+wc_font 2 diffs/winedbg.trace and then typed 'quit'. Trace attached. (i

Press: CodeWeavers/Xandros Deal: Let the Revolution Begin!

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
From LinuxWeeklyNews: http://www.consultingtimes.com/articles/codeweavers/codeweaversxandros.html -- Dimi.

Re: Second Listview status update

2002-10-17 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 17, 2002 01:49 am, Rein Klazes wrote: Uploaded to www.xs4all.nl/~rklazes/temp/nb3.log.bz2 Fine. That didn't work... :/ But I think I fixed now: please try T0, and T1. If that doesn't work... -- Dimi.

Re: Listview Z0 (roll-up patch)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 04:31 pm, Michael Stefaniuc wrote: Well a Y is pretty much not used in the romanian language :) Thank you Michael, this is it ;) Come to think of it, it's not used at all... Honestly, I also hated that I to learn the alphabet, and the multiplication table! :))) -- Dimi.

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 25, 2002 04:18 pm, Rein Klazes wrote: What I see different from native comcontrol is that 1- during a refresh everything is redrawn, including the header control; This is fixable, and it will get fixed soon. 2- the refreshing continues about once every second until the download

Re: DSTRICT: commdlg

2002-10-26 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 26, 2002 11:14 am, Matthew Davison wrote: - chf32a-hInstance=chf16-hInstance; + chf32a-hInstance=(HINSTANCE)(ULONG_PTR)chf16-hInstance; Shouldn't we have a HINSTANCE_32 macro, for uniformity? -- Dimi.

Re: DSTRICT: commdlg

2002-10-26 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 26, 2002 11:14 am, Matthew Davison wrote: -bRet = DialogBoxIndirectParam16( hInst, lfs-hDlgTmpl16, lpofn-hwndOwner, +bRet = DialogBoxIndirectParam16( (HINSTANCE16)LOWORD(hInst), lfs-hDlgTmpl16, lpofn-hwndOwner, And here we should have a HINSTANCE_16 macro... --

Re: [RFC] creating Wine's own 'assert' variant

2002-10-26 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 26, 2002 12:54 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: A better approach would be to leave assert() alone, and raise an exception on the SIGABRT signal. Interesting, I didn't know abort() raised SIGABRT. That's cool, and works better in general, particularly for winelib apps. -- Dimi.

Re: Wine securityflaw.

2002-10-27 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 27, 2002 06:37 am, Peter Andersson wrote: My idea is to use ptrace in a supervisor process to trap all syscalls from the wine process, and use some kind of sanity checks for some of the syscalls. Watching the fork,exec,open,write and unlink syscalls and doing sanity checks could

Re: Listview Z8

2002-10-27 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 27, 2002 11:28 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: ChangeLog Mark immutable objects as const. Fix inconsisten *-style. This one, of course, is Z7, not Z8. Hmm, now I have problems with digits, on top of the alphabet... And NO, we used to do a _lot_ of math in Romania! :P -- Dimi.

Re: Listview Z8

2002-10-27 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 27, 2002 12:05 pm, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Oh my god!!! he is running out of alphabet letters!!! ;-) That's right. And we don't know what's going to happen, it's uncharted territory. So if you have listview problems, speak now!!! :) -- Dimi.

Re: Listview Z8

2002-10-27 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 27, 2002 12:14 pm, Shachar Shemesh wrote: àáâãäåæçèéëìîðñòôö÷øùú. Very useful `-) Very cool man, but, ..., hmm, ..., I don't have a Hebrew keyboard. ;) -- Dimi.

Bad hand

2002-10-27 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Sorry everybody, My right hand hurts badly, I'll be off for a few days... -- Dimi.

Listview: what next?

2002-10-28 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
Folks, I now consider the listview rewrite complete. What this means: -- current revision (1.325) may become a reference rev for a while -- bugs for the listview should be submitted through Bugzilla NOw, I know there are outstanding bugs. Most likely, there would always be. But i have to

Re: more desperate cries for help...

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 29, 2002 07:00 am, Dustin Navea wrote: yes please, do get better soon, i may be coming down with something myself, my friend/roommate's ex may be the one that gave it to me too :( You dog... ;) -- Dimi.

Re: winapi update

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 29, 2002 09:32 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote: *** winapi_check * tools/winapi/win16.api, tools/winapi/win32.api: API file update. *** winapi_checked Patrik, please send different patches in different emails. See past discussions for rationale. -- Dimi.

Re: recent ListView problems

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 29, 2002 06:30 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using WinMX (www.winmx.com) rather frequently, currently version 3.30. Some two weeks ago, Wine HEAD displayed the ListView components from the search and transfer tabs perfectly, now the refresh/redrawing is messed up. Please, file

Re: winapi update

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 29, 2002 10:15 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote: However in this case there are some logical relation between the patches. Can't argue, hand hurts. But histroy shows that you like to argue for no good reason :). Case in point: [snip expication why you had to do it this way] OK, this

Re: Known listview bugs (take 2)

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 24, 2002 02:12 pm, Paul Rupe wrote: - This is something that never worked in the old code either so it may not be listview-related. An obscure Xnews feature is that you can right-click the read column in the newsgroup listing and edit its contents. Instead the standard context

Re: winapi update

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote: Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft Outlook wraps the lines and I sure a lot of other people that use attachments have similar problems. And can't be turned off?!? Hmmm, anyway, just attach them as text/plain. -- Dimi.

Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
People, I think everybody here agrees that Wine's biggest problem is the lack of developers. No developers, slow progress, no users, back to no developers. We are in this vicious circle for a while, spinning our wheels like crazy. We've achieved great progress lately, but I hope we all agree that

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 08:56 am, Andreas Mohr wrote: Thus you could encounter an app which manages to trash your whole filesystem ANY DAY; this app simply needs to use a very rarely used function that we barely implemented... BOOM. Andy, this is just crap, and it's the type of crap that we should

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 09:20 am, Andreas Mohr wrote: I don't want to spread the perception that Wine is unsafe - in by far almost all cases it's definitely not. But people should keep in mind that for every new program that they install, there might still be a bug lurking in some rarely used

Re: listview: last column problem

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 02:01 pm, Rein Klazes wrote: Do you see any objections removing the test and error message? Good catch. Please try this patch: Index: dlls/comctl32/listview.c === RCS file:

Re: Treeview Notifications Fix (update)

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 03:34 pm, Dustin Navea wrote: Well after some more debugging, I think that it is a problem with the SendMessageA function itself, not with any of the arguments being passed to it. I think you are chasing the wrong problem... -- Dimi.

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 01:57 am, Ender wrote: - Many apps do not work without Desktop enabled. This is far worse than it sounds, because most newbies try managed non-desktop first. People think WINE should be able to do seemless intergration. Then when an application hangs, they think it's

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 04:50 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote: I wholeheartedly disagree here.. I only use (and only ever will) use Desktop mode in Wine. It's the same (for me) as using Tabbed browsing in Mozilla : you have all the related mess in one window :-) Sorry Lionel, but You Are Wrong (tm)! :) By

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 05:12 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote: For me, running 'explorer' (or whatever is called the Windows WM) in a desktopped Windows session and actually have the 'Start' button in the lower right corner of the window to start Windows applications would be the way I would prefer running

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 05:05 pm, Uwe Bonnes wrote: - any program in non-desktop mode switching to full screen - any application poping up endless series of new processes This focuses on the wrong problem. A Wine app is just that: an app. If this is a problem, the WM must allow you to deal with

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 05:01 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: I think desktop mode is useful in some circumstances like when you want to prevent an application from taking over the whole screen (typically installers or the PowerPoint viewer). While it may be useful in strange circumstances, it's not

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 05:27 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote: Well, yes, if I wanted to ONLY use Windows applications I could do something like that. But a part from using Xnest or hacks like that (VNC comes to my mind too) I do not see how I could do what I want to do without support in Wine itself. So

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 09:11 am, Uwe Bonnes wrote: think of Win32 as a user library, just like Motif or QT. So the thing of beauty ( or missing beauty) gets relative... Very good point. This is another angle I wanted to approach: we are currently perceived by some as a 'evil thing' which allows

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 30, 2002 10:34 pm, Jeremy White wrote: However, I strongly agree with Lionel - since we have desktop mode, we should keep it as an option. Free software is all about choice. Yes, but that choice does not refer to to the choice of cramming every feature together. :) Virtually all

So lets say we do it

2002-10-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
That is, Lets assume for the sake of argument that Alexandre likes my 0.8 idea so much, that he releases Wine 0.8 with much fanfare next Monday (so we have a good audience), and the news reaches Slashdot where a message with a link to http://www.winehq.org is posted, in good CmdrTaco fashion...

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 10:29 am, Andreas Mohr wrote: Sorry to say that, but in this mail, *you* were talking *some* crap IMHO ;-) It's OK, you just missed the point. :P Honestly, you did: it's not ranting, it's a way to highlight where, and what we need to do. I said that in the P.S. by the way.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 11:40 am, Carlos Lozano wrote: 10th Anniversary (??-??-2003)? sounds to a good date. Cool! :) Alexandre, when is that? -- Dimi.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 11:24 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote: You forgot a few things here: Yes, and no: it was getting late, hand was all funny, email was getting too long... :) First it doesn't even start because they don't have a config file. OK, Hear, hear! BTW, we should move configuration

Re: dlls/msvcrt/tests: printf

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 01:46 pm, Greg Turner wrote: In support of attached patches: Most are irrelevant. The point is not to transport the patch to Alexandre. If so, you might as well send it directly to him. Point is to get peer review, and maybe comments. For this purpose, inlining the patch is

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 01:21 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Sometime in June, I don't have the exact date of the first release unfortunately. Release 0.0.2 was on June 25. Too far away for 0.8, too close for 1.0. Maybe 0.9, if we're lucky. -- Dimi.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 02:44 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: Gee, thanks ! You know how many man-weeks (err, months ?) I've been putting into it, right ? I was referring to the interface, not the content. In fact, I think the web-interface makes a disservice to the content. In fact, I am saying quite the

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:00 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: Not yet too late for another 'Halloween' release though ;) Yep... ...next year ! ;) I don't want to jinx it, but at the rate we're going, we'd be lucky to do a 1.0 'Halloween' release next year :/ -- Dimi.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 02:44 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: For christ's sake, IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE DOCU, THEN *IMPROVE IT*. Well, that's a good point. And I did a bit, but not nearly as much as you. I did. (past tense) But maybe then it seems like I didn't... Hey, I've never complained about the

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:09 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: Well, that maintenance would e.g. include the localization work I suggested, having a *separate* CVS containing all localized Wine Guides, and having automatically updated docu maintenance web pages for every language involved. But this is

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:11 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: Why, the current rate is avalanche-like ;) I'm growing ever more astonished about the increase in wine-patches per day... Same here. It's quite amazing! But can we sustain the rate for a year? But of course you're sorta right, we're still

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:33 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: (OK, if you're overly pessimistic, then you'll probably tell me now that nobody will ever work on updating foreign languages, despite of such a marvellous infrastructure) No, all I am saying is that's a lot of effort, for not that huge gain.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:58 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: BTW, I just updated the Contribute page quite a lot. Very cool. You see, there's a lot of good stuff on the site, but it's kinda hidden. We need to bring some of it (like screenshots, FAQ, contributing) more to the front, so people stumble upon

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 04:18 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: Bl**dy b*tch ! :-)) Listen man, I don't like that! I mean, what's up with the stars?!? :))) First you annoy the h*ll out of people, and then you behave as if nothing had ever happened and the weather was fantastic... ;-) Oh, Andy dude, you

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 04:26 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote: I wouldn't be 100% against placing a Screenshot link on the main page - it's a mere 99% only. But with the current menu infrastructure, I'm about 150% against it. If we added a separate Screenshots menu item (which, by the way, I don't think

Re: Versions mass-appeal

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 03:35 am, Johan Gill wrote: Even with perfectly working builtin dlls, one needs overrides for the native dlls that are proprietary, or the loading will fail. Or is this a bug? This doesn't sound right. Can you give some examples of that happening? -- Dimi.

Wine 0.8 TODO v0.1

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
This is the initial TODO for Wine 0.8. I know, 0.8 has been released before, but that's ancient history. Whether or not it gets released with this version number is irrelevant. In fact, even if it never becomes a public release, it is an important point to reach toward 0.9, and so if we

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 05:05 pm, Jeremy Newman wrote: Oh pick ME ME ME! :-) OK mister, you're on! :) I don't volunteer my weekends often, so speak now. IMO we need to reorganize the front page a bit more than that. Namely: -- the big Navigation box is wasted space, because 1. It

Re: I suck...

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 08:17 pm, Greg Turner wrote: Inlined for your viewing pleasure. Cool, thanks! :) -- Dimi.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 11:47 pm, Jeremy Newman wrote: Here's what I will do. I will start a new design, I will put it up at: http://lostwages.winehq.org. A very rough draft of the home page alone with new nav should be online late (very very late) sunday night, pending real life (TM) does not

Re: Wine 0.8 TODO v0.1

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 06:02 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -- Users can start using Wine -- works well for a fair number of apps -- no MS DLLs required (from real Windows) That alone should take a couple of years g Oh, what next, Murphy

Re: Treeview notifications

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 11:32 pm, Dustin Navea wrote: in TREEVIEW_NotifyFormat shouldnt (lParam == NF_REQUERY) be (lParam == NF_QUERY) and change the corresponding line in TREEVIEW_Create since that is the original query? No, the code seems to be OK as it is now. Does this hack fix your problem?

Re: Wine 0.8 TODO v0.1

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 1, 2002 12:52 am, Ender wrote: Almost. It's on a 100% no-windows install, the only naitve DLL's I use are installed by IE6 itself - I think I'm using native crypt32/secur32 to get SSL working, and native wininet. I don't care what the app installs. I care what you do _before_ the

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-10-31 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On October 31, 2002 07:00 pm, Francois Gouget wrote: This is a good start. Here are my comments, based on the following principles: -- while I appreciate (as a geek) the logical nesting of topics, I think they should be organized more around usage patterns. A common topic should

Re: Wine 0.8 TODO v0.1

2002-11-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 1, 2002 05:40 am, Carlos Lozano wrote: Oki doki :) Very cool. Things like FTP Commander, WinZip, etc. Even if they are not perfect (like FTP Commnader with it's ComboEx problem), but they look like can be esily fixed. We can then start going through them, and getting them to work.

Re: So lets say we do it

2002-11-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 1, 2002 03:04 am, Francois Gouget wrote: Anyway, I'm not sure 'Status' should be top-level and if you look on GNUStep's site it is in fact level 2 (it's a submenu of 'Information'). It is definitely a 'one-click' item. I get a instant surge of sympathy for projects (there are quite

Re: Wine 0.8 TODO v0.1 + help request :)

2002-11-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 1, 2002 07:37 am, Dustin Navea wrote: Does this include games too? I would say yes, most def. -- Dimi.

Re: Wine FAQ - call for a volunteer

2002-11-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On November 1, 2002 08:15 am, Jeremy White wrote: My vision for the FAQ is a hand edited main FAQ with the current FAQ-o-matic being pushed to a secondary role. Please get rid of the FAQ-O-matic. The interface is atrocious. A hand written one would do just fine, is not like we add 100

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >