2008/6/30 James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
+ok(si.nMin == 0xdeadbeef, si.nMin == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n, si.nMin);
+ok(si.nMax == 0xdeadbeef, si.nMax == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n,
PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:40:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] user32: Add additional tests for scroll state, make them pass under Wine.
---
dlls/user32/scroll.c | 36 +--
dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c | 273
2 files changed, 300 insertions
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch adds a few tests for scrollbar behavior in Windows. It shows that
if the window was created with at least WS_VSCROLL or WS_HSCROLL styles,
WinXP returns default information for scrollbar range, but Win98
Why in the world would you implement Win98 behavior over WinXP,
especially since the WinXP behavior is more logical and (probably,
haven't looked) stated on msdn?
I did not implement Win98 behavior - it was already implemented that way
in Wine, except for one difference that was found and
