Dear all,
the WinPcap team is not willing to loose its time with disputes. However, a
lot of false information is circulating on the mailing lists. So, we are
forced to point out a couple of things.
For who is interested in using WinPcap, we would like to say that:
- the proposed patch is a
However, the 'packet.c' is user-level code, which is part of
the DLL. With SMP, the problems are into the kernel portion
of the driver, the .SYS file.
Just for my own clarity, but I thought that packet.c (not packet32.c)
is part of the driver. It certainly looks like driver code to me,
and
for pointing out this point,
fulvio
-Original Message-
From: Jason Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] Announce: WinPcap MP Support
However, the 'packet.c' is user-level code, which
Hi Lee,
thanks for the mail.
On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 08:53 PM, Lee Nguyen wrote:
Hi. First of all, great job with the MP support. It's nice to be
able to
use winpcap on my MP machine. Now, the bugs...
Win2K throws a BSOD when I attempt to send a packet flood using
winpcap's
Hi Lee,
thanks for the mail.
On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 08:53 PM, Lee Nguyen wrote:
Hi. First of all, great job with the MP support. It's nice to be
able to
use winpcap on my MP machine. Now, the bugs...
Win2K throws a BSOD when I attempt to send a packet flood using
winpcap's
Fantastic,
this probably fixes the problems with new CPU's supporting hyperthreading!
Hopefully this will be included in the next version of WinPCap.
Thanks a lot,
Dries Decock
-Original Message-
From: Luca Deri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vrijdag 24 januari 2003 9:50
To: [EMAIL
