I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover for
the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements cover if you're using stock
Rockets with stock UBNT antennas.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Sam
That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in
performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible?
Thanks
Sam
On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote:
I think the big plus with the KP antennas is they come with a cover for
the rocket. You'll have to buy a RF Elements
KP hands down. Better antennas.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 28, 2014 10:29 AM, Sam w...@csilogan.com wrote:
That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in
performance between the two? Big difference?
somewhat pointless to me...
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Sam
[w...@csilogan.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
That's a great
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
That's a great point. Thank you Andy. How about differences in
performance between the two? Big difference? Negligible?
Thanks
Sam
On 8/28/2014 09:18, Andy Trimmell wrote:
I think the big plus with the KP antennas
-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Sam
[w...@csilogan.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets.
I was wondering about the shielding as well. Unless you're
, forget
it, you will have problems.
2.4 in 10mhz cw.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:33 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
one
.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [wireless-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Sam [w...@csilogan.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Mathew, these are for 2. GHz Rockets.
I was wondering about the shielding
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Same radios but I had the opposite experience. I had one at -35, maybe the RF
armor requires both of those dumb machine screws to work.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
one obvious advantage with the KPP is that the connectors or all covered by
the shielding, so you eliminate any potential issues with water in the
connectors, and you can throw away that annoying cover on the Rocket over
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by mistake... =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Matt Brendle
Luthman
*Sent:* Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:30 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by mistake... =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
If you get out to the job and don't have the right pigtail because the vendor
didn't ship the right one, it's not the vendors fault. You should have several
spares of every flavor in your truck. If not, it's a safe bet Murphy
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Which is a problem when they ship you N male to N male by mistake... =P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Matt Brendle
, 2014 3:30:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Just open up all boxes and check all your parts before you go out. Nuts.
Brackets. Cables.
I've never had a problem with missing parts on UBNT sectors.
On 8/28/2014 2:07 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Not only should you
://twitter.com/ICSIL
*From: *Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com
*To: *WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:30:43 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
Just open up all
To be honest, I've never used a KP antenna. I've heard about them, but
we could never use them. No shield kit makes them unusable to us.
The regular unbiquiti antennas with Chris's shield kits make pretty much
everything else obsolete, except for 45-120deg Ti sectors with RF Armor.
Josh
You don't need shield kits, they ship with a metal case to go around a
Rocket. It's just one part instead of two.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 28, 2014 5:04 PM, Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
To be honest, I've
I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of
signal levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won
in the isolation test, by far.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
On 08/28/2014 01:09
Performance vs UBNT Antennas
I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of signal
levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in the
isolation test, by far.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com On 08/28/2014 01:09 PM
*From: *Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com
*To: *wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison
of signal levels
: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
I have seen the reports from various people doing direct comparison of
signal levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor. The ubnt+rfarmor won in
the isolation test, by far.
Josh Reynolds, Chief
@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Sent: *Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:12:55 PM
*Subject: *Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
I have seen the reports from various people doing direct
comparison of signal levels on the tower between kp/ubnt+rfarmor.
The ubnt+rfarmor won
there.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Reynolds j...@spitwspots.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:59:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] KP Performance vs UBNT Antennas
We avoid sissy towers :P
24 matches
Mail list logo
