Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Which picture matches? http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html -Hal -Original Message- From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:54:18 -0500 The 300 looks like the Redline cpe On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which picture matches? http://www.apertonet.com/products/pmax_subscriberunits.html -Hal -Original Message- From: 3-dB Networks [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WISPA] 3.650 Wimax in the field

Right, Mike. The FCC's thinking appears to be power density and not just straight power. This is why, with the same power, you will see roughly a 3dB RX increase from cutting the channel size in half. -Hal -Original Message- From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] Direct Hit! ...NEED two Redline AN80s 5.4 and 5.8 ..FAST

John, We have Ligowave PTPs available in GA at our warehouse (Concord, GA). I think we also have a couple of integrated units in our office in ATL. If you need for us to meet you somewhere in between we could do that too. -Hal -Original Message- From: John McDowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WISPA] New Deliberant radios

Flex. We were looking for a faster, cross platform configuration method and flex/flash really works in this case. We can support browser or standalone on windows/linux/ppc and give a much better overall experience with the configuration. http://www.adobe.com/products/flex/overview/ -Hal

Re: [WISPA] Power Supplies

Be sure to note that these are linear power supplies and not switching. -Hal -Original Message- From: Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Power Supplies Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008

Re: [WISPA] cards

What CPU board are you using as this may limit your options? -Hal -Original Message- From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] cards Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:09:18

Re: [WISPA] Equip Leasing

We have had good success with Marlin Leasing: https://www.marlinleasing.com/marlinleasing/index.asp?menu=ml -Hal On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 13:07 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have a good relationship with a reputable equipment leasing firm? If so, who are you using? Thanks

Re: [WISPA] manufacturing CPE for customers

The OP asked for OpenWRT support, and I don't think RBs support this. -Hal On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:11 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote: The RB100 and 500s have been decent. Most people have a lot of them. I'm not a fan of them really. The RB400s have been absolutely amazing. They (as Apple

Re: [WISPA] 3.65Ghz / 802.11y-2008

Thanks for catching that...it must not have been updated when the grant was received. The PTP3 is in fact certified for US operation. Internationally, it can operate from 3.3GHz to 3.7GHz. -Harold On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:53 -0800, Charles Wyble wrote: Jason, Thanks for that. According

Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth and costs...

Blair, Do you think you could do the same thing from Chicago or Detroit? You should be able to get something in the $30~50/Mb range, maybe better if you can shoot off of a carrier hotel roof or something. -Hal -Original Message- From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] Mesh just for kicks

Well there is also the mesh part too. Is this what you guys are talking about when you say MT mesh: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Mesh_wds If so, I would disagree that this is a good mesh implementation. There are many, many more factors to consider when building an infrastructure mesh. The

Re: [WISPA] Mesh just for kicks

. The folks that say this claim that WDS is not mesh, at least in their book. Would you concur? Greg On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Harold Bledsoe wrote: Well there is also the mesh part too. Is this what you guys are talking about when you say MT mesh: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki

Re: [WISPA] Mesh just for kicks

is a very broad term; it's like happiness - there are many flavors... Harold Bledsoe wrote: Well there is also the mesh part too. Is this what you guys are talking about when you say MT mesh: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Mesh_wds If so, I would disagree that this is a good mesh

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

I think the confusion on this comes from the fact that for the P90 licensing process, only the transmitter information is collected. Remember that even with Part 90 devices, they still must comply with Part 15 requirements for unintentional radiators. This is covered with a Declaration of

[WISPA] Cost of bandwidth

Those of you that are paying $50/Mbps, what is keeping you from building your own backhaul to cheaper bandwidth (wireless, dark fiber, etc.)? It seems to me that this would be a major consideration in the business plan as this is a big MRC. Don't wait for someone to bring you cheap

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik FCC

The Contains FCC ID: PPD-AR5BXB63 means that the laptop contains a certified module. EEEPC or whoever the manufacturer is, still had to get a Declaration of Conformity covering the laptop, module, likely peripherals, and AC adapter. What they didn't have to do is get a new full certification for

Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet 5M

If you are in the US, you can look up the FCC ID to see what frequencies are legal. -Hal On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 22:44 -0700, Tim Kerns wrote: I just received a couple to begin testing (more like playing with) and I'm not sure of the Freq. it covers. The selections are : 5180 to 5320 in

Re: [WISPA] 900Mhz question

Well now that's not very nice On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 14:43 -0400, ralph wrote: Oh- you must be using Ligowave (ducking) -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Robert West Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:37 AM

RE: [WISPA] RE: [WISPA Advertisement] Welcome Deliberant asWISPAsNewest VendorMember

Advertisement] Welcome Deliberant as WISPAs Newest VendorMember I want to take a moment of your time to introduce you to Deliberant http://www.deliberant.com/. They are WISPA's newest Vendor Member. I spoke a few times with Harold Bledsoe of Deliberant and he is excited about the opportunities

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

. The receive sensitivities are comparable. -Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark McElvy Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:38 AM

RE: [WISPA] MT power supplies

We have had a couple of cables that have shown link lights and passed data sporadically. We replaced the cable and it worked fine after that. The cable did NOT pass the tester though. :-) -Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

Did you try both antenna ports? On the two that connected, were the signals 12 to 14dB lower on both sides of the link? -Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 http://www.deliberant.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [WISPA] asset mgmt

Ditto on the in-house thing. It seemed to be as much work to integrate as it was to just do what we actually wanted. :-) -Hal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 3:00 PM To: WISPA General

RE: [WISPA] lightning

suppose... ;-) -Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KyWiFi LLC Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 3:53 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re

[WISPA] 60GHz radio trial

-Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail

RE: [WISPA] OTARD

Fascinating. I had always read OTARD to only cover client devices and not base station devices. -Hal __ Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [WISPA] anyone used high powered deliberant?

Actually we have recently added an LNA to this product that boosts the receive sensitivity to -91 @ 11Mbps (same as the DLB25xx). We haven't had time to update all the product docs yet but will hopefully get to it today or tomorrow. -Hal Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office

RE: [WISPA] Getting the sticker.

some information on it with respect to the module inside and the DoC compliance. I'll have to look that up. -Hal Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office) 404.693.0660 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [WISPA] XR 9 cards

They are not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Ryan Spott Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:29 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] XR 9 cards Seeing as the SR9 cards were not compatible with the Tranzeo TR900 series

RE: [WISPA] Alternative to Meraki mesh??

offer QoS across the mesh end-to-end. Here are the datasheets for the products: http://www.ligowave.com/landing/specs/LGOM2AGN.pdf http://www.ligowave.com/landing/specs/LGOM3AGN.pdf These are available from Deliberant and from DoubleRadius as well. Let me know if you have any questions! Harold

RE: [WISPA] Alternative to Meraki mesh??

Yes, and our system is built off of a customized version of this software. Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office) 404.693.0660 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jory

Re: [WISPA] Radio Vendor Suggestions

The 70Mbps is a 40Mhz channel. We get around 40Mbps on a 20MHz channel. The PTP product is not an 11a mac as that has been rewritten by us to improve performance, especially over distance and to allow for better 2-way traffic handling, among other things. 70Mbps over distance (and higher) is

Re: [WISPA] 802.11y future and vendors?

But that's the million dollar question. Will the FCC approve it if it is not 802.11y? I read somewhere that the FCC was waiting for 802.11y to be approved before authorizing equipment in the upper part of the 3.65 band. Otherwise, yes it is technically possible to implement this with atheros

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

The RF energy detection mechanism of 802.11a is sort of based on power level. If the preamble is detected and decoded, then the mechanism is activated at -82dBm. Otherwise it requires a relatively high energy level (-62dBm). Although I agree that even -62dBm seems fair. It would be very useful

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

of emails on the topic, some of which were from the FCC to someone wanting certification. insert witty tagline here - Original Message - From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:52

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

We don't harvest from any mailing lists. I will contact you offlist. :) -Original Message- From: Ryan Langseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave? Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:47:46 -0500 Today i got

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

No, really, we didn't harvest anyone's email from any mailing lists. We are very careful to only market to customers of our companies (Deliberant, Ligowave, Wiligear, Wilibox) and have a very simple removal and opt out policy that we honor. I'm sure you all market to your customers in various

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

. insert witty tagline here - Original Message - From: Harold Bledsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:52 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP The RF energy detection mechanism

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

- From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave? Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 00:00:23 -0500 (CDT) On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Harold Bledsoe wrote: No, really, we didn't harvest anyone's

Re: [WISPA] RB532 and 40MBps

When it comes to comparing network/embedded CPUs, there is more than just MHz that needs to be considered. Some CPUs have multiple cores, hardware accelerators, etc. For example, we use a Gemini SL3512 CPU in some of our products. Here are some of the accelerators that it has: -Layer2/3/4

Re: [WISPA] Ligo Wave

Hi Justin, Check with Ligowave support (supp...@ligowave.com) and get an updated fw image. It improves the performance quite a bit especially in noisy environments. And yes they are certified. -Hal On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:39 -0400, Justin Wilson wrote: Have deployed 5 of the Mimo ligowave

RE: [WISPA] Equipment Leasing

Here is a calculator you can use... https://www.marlinleasing.com/marlin/enduser/quotecalculator.asp Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office) 404.693.0660 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [WISPA] PPPoE The good, the bad and the ugly please

and control via radius, you can look at certificate-based, username/password-based, etc. that are all based on standards and are much more secure. If you APs support VSSIDs, then you can run a combination of these on one AP. :-) -Hal Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office

RE: [WISPA] Radio choices

otherwise. -Hal Harold Bledsoe Deliberant LLC 800.742.9865 x205 (office) 404.693.0660 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.deliberant.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark McElvy Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:15 PM To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] Speaking of Tranzeo......

We've put in a lot of effort to harden our devices. The result is that we have a very, very low failure rate on the CPE-2 CPE-5 -- a lot lower than the previous Realtek based products. I'm happy to answer any questions. -Hal On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 07:42 -0500, Jason Hensley wrote: Other than

Re: [WISPA] WISPA TV Whitespaces Meeting with the FCC

6MHz is a weird channel size for our industry traditionally but in 5MHz ~25Mbps aggregate would be comfortable. -Hal On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 07:39 -0700, Ryan Spott wrote: Hey Steve, I use the cable-cos as an example. They get 30Mbit/sec for 6Mhz. (at least using docsis) ryan On Mon,

Re: [WISPA] The guy's name from airSync

Sriram. He is on the forum as well. -Hal On Dec 13, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: Spent time searching for the guy's name who put the airSync information together, 'sing' something? A little help here? Thanks, Forbes

Re: [WISPA] FCC477 fines?

/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Harold Bledsoe WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] Ethernet over power lines (notthe failedpower companyBPL trials)

___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- Harold Bledsoe

Re: [WISPA] Recommend Managed Switch

-- Harold Bledsoe ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] 60 Ghz gear

Since we have more than one mounting option now and different folks want different ones, we are pulling the mounts out of the radio box and letting it be your choice which one. The transition has been less than smooth. We are reminding all our partners about this. The sector is the first to

Re: [WISPA] Wispapalooza - Where is the Gear Beef?

There may have been a 10G tri-band omni in our booth. ;-) On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Gino A. Villarini wrote: > It doesn’t seen that Wispapalooza is the new gear coming out party it once > was? No new gear announced? Has the industry lost its shine? > > Nothing new

Re: [WISPA] 900MHz band

https://fccid.io/SWX-M900/Test-Report/Test-Report-1260212 You can see that it was tested/certified on 5/10/20MHz channels. -Hal On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: > We had an issue this week where we had a Power company have a 50K licensed > band at 901.152 Mhz for power