Hi,
From Pascal:
GMR-1 dissectors, like GSM-A dissectors, can be seen either as separate
protocols belonging to the same family, or as a single protocol with sub
dissectors:it depends a bit on your point of view :) Personnally I see them
as a single one (like Sylvain) and was rather happy
2012/8/20 mman...@netscape.net
Sylvain,
The checkdisplayfilter.pl script reflects my interpretation of the
desired display filter format, and since there hasn't been that much
feedback on the outputted results (with Pascal's comments on the GSM
dissectors being the exception), I
Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Tue, Aug 21, 2012 5:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] rev 44161:
/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-gmr1_bcch.c
packet
Hi,
I've just seen those changes (filter names) now and I'm really not
happy with them ...
1) I explicitely asked this list for objections against the gmr1.xx vs
gmr1_xx name and I was told that using gmr1.xx made sense given it's
always the same protocol. And nobody expressed any view against
Le 19 août 2012 à 12:40, Sylvain Munaut 246...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi,
I've just seen those changes (filter names) now and I'm really not
happy with them ...
1) I explicitely asked this list for objections against the gmr1.xx vs
gmr1_xx name and I was told that using gmr1.xx made sense
Hi Pascal,
If you check the mailing list archive you will see that I also raised
this issue regarding filter names for protocols split across several
files. See http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201207/msg00258.html
for the mail exchange.
Yes, I've seen this (I replied in the same
: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 3:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] rev 44161:
/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-gmr1_bcch.c
packet-gmr1_common.c packet-gmr1_rr.c
I don't know all the protocols where this happens but to me having
gmr1_rr.xxx
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=44161
User: mmann
Date: 2012/07/31 10:19 AM
Log:
update GMR-1 protocols display filers
Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
ChangesPathAction
+67 -67packet-gmr1_bcch.c Modified
+14 -14
for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Tue, Jul 31, 2012 3:07 pm
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-commits: [Wireshark-commits] rev 44161:
/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-gmr1_bcch.c
packet-gmr1_common.c packet-gmr1_rr.c
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi
2012/7/31 mman...@netscape.net
I guess where I (and the .pl script) got tripped up was the fact that
there were separate protocols registered and they gave the impression they
were unique and not just one big protocol broken up over several files.
The script just generates the questionable
10 matches
Mail list logo
