We could migrate the EXTRA_DIST macro from trunk/Makefile.am to
trunk/Makefile.common and use it to generate the distribution files
for windows too.
Generating an extra_dist.ini file for nsi if in fact it does support
including files?
On 1/10/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL
On 1/11/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Ontanon wrote:
We could migrate the EXTRA_DIST macro from trunk/Makefile.am to
trunk/Makefile.common and use it to generate the distribution files
for windows too.
Generating an extra_dist.ini file for nsi if in fact it does support
Hi folks,
in rev 20393 I checked in the code to verify authentication and
dercypt SNMPv3 packets.
Now, I only have a limited set of SNMP packets against which to test
the code, all of them generated by net-snmp. It would be nice if other
people could test the feature maybe against something
ronnie,
You should take a look at this capture. These out-if-order packets
look to me more like retransmissions.
L,
It appears that 192.168.70.42 transmits twice every TCP packet.
What's the cause I can't tell but that's certainly a problem of that
box. Try disabling the firewall if you
fixed in revision 20424
On 1/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1301
Summary: File Open dialog preview needs 3s for large invalid
files and appears dead
Product: Wireshark
ep_alloc allocates a buffer that is freed automatically before passing
to the next packet. It is not leaked. see doc/README.malloc and/or
epan/emem.h
On 1/14/07, Sebastien Tandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I provide a patch for a memory leak in dissect_ip_tcp_options.
Each time a
that's glib2 only, what about select()?
On 1/15/07, Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 05:16:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XXX - to prevent a busy wait, I need a portable way to wait for a
short time period, like Sleep() for Windows
How about
While hacking on the dfilter machinery I noticed that
final_registration_ncp() compiles 120 displays filters.
What I can't find in the code is what these are used for as no part of
the code uses them.
Are these realy necessary?
Luis
--
This information is top security. When you have read
On 1/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20445
User: ulfl
Date: 2007/01/15 10:17 PM
Log:
Help:
- Win32 only: try to load help page from local user-guide.chm (if HHC_DIR is
set in config.nmake) and if that
On 1/16/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Ontanon wrote:
using file:///usr/local/share/wireshark/wsug/%s could be little less
painful than the internet way. Specially if the box is not wired to
the wild.
Yes, and I would appreciate it.
It would have another advantage
They commited what we got in rev 20447.
As this does not happen to me (I'm running with MallocBadFreeAbort) I
would need a a backtrace where the yyminor value passed to DtdParse()
shows up.
can you -DDEBUG_DTD_PARSER and send in the trace for the parser.
Thanks.
Luis
On 1/16/07, Douglas
in order to avoid this one you just have to rename the dtds directory,
no dtds directory no dtds get parsed.
On 1/16/07, Douglas Pratley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get a similar crash under Windows. I'm having trouble reverting back
to a good baseline without losing today's work, so it would be
= 0x8583d38, yy44 = 0x8583d38
smil8=X\b:10, yy59 = 0x8583d38, yy81 = 14568}
(gdb)
On 1/16/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They commited what we got in rev 20447.
As this does not happen to me (I'm running with MallocBadFreeAbort) I
would need a a backtrace where the yyminor
FYC
I added macros to the display filter engine.
At startup the df_macros in either userdir or (if not found) datadir
will be loaded (if there is one).
The GUI dialog is just a dummy allows you to see.
the format of the file is as follows, I believe they are self explanatory:
-- example
However to assign many addresses I used to assing entire classes of
addresses to a loopback interface (usually lo1) and have routed (rip)
announcing routes to them through the wired interfaces that had just
one address, If your OS supports it (at least BSDs do) that's cleaner.
Luis
On 1/18/07,
in the past...
I re-wrote the function in C instead of using the lex scanner, What I
realy forgot was to remove it from Makefile.nmake.
Sorry
Luis
On 1/18/07, Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Where is dfilter_macro_expand.l
The Win32 buildbot needs it.
cd ..
cd
However for unix the real issue is to have the html files been built.
I thought about parameterized Makefile.am and a catalog.xml.in that
overwrite both files from the repo (used by cygwin) if --with-fop=xxx
--with-docbook=yyy options are passed to ./configure. What the
--with-fop option should
maybe not, but the following perl command line does the work.
# this nativizes eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\n;'
# this DOSifies eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\012\015;'
# this Unixizes eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\015;'
# this OldMacIzes eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\012;'
oops that would be
$(PERL) -ae 'chomp; print $_\015;' infile outfile
On 1/19/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe not, but the following perl command line does the work.
# this nativizes eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\n;'
# this DOSifies eols
${PERL} -ae 'chomp; print $_\012
this should go into 0.99.5
On 1/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20514
User: lego
Date: 2007/01/21 05:05 PM
Log:
fix bug 1320
Directory: /trunk/epan/wslua/
ChangesPath Action
+1 -1
Gerald,
this should go in 0.99.5
On 1/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20515
User: lego
Date: 2007/01/21 05:06 PM
Log:
fix bug 1321
Directory: /trunk/epan/wslua/
ChangesPath Action
Hi,
* Can you test it against 0.99.5pre1?
I cannot make it crash (works OK for me), could you send the capture
file that does crash?
Could you eventually send in also the output of wireshark -v
Thanks
Luis
BTW
sub_buf = buffer( 4, buffer:len() - 4 ):tvb()
is the same as
sub_buf = buffer(4):tvb()
The radius dictionary gets loaded way before preferences are
evaluated. Giving no warning and then having the packets undecoded
isn't elegant.
Your patch suppresses the error altoghether which is not a nice solution.
What you can do is just add a dummy radius dir and a dummy dictionary:
$ cd
that has written such user configurable
dissectors so far...
I also failed to understand why tshark does not give this warning message.
maybe g_warning is handled differently (?)
Regards
Andrej
On Sat, 27.Jan.07 01:55:35 +0100, Luis Ontanon wrote:
The radius dictionary gets loaded way before
Few thoughts on this see inline
On 1/28/07, Martin Mathieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/07, Kriang Lerdsuwanakij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With above 3 changes together, dissecting Iub traces are correct for
control and signaling planes. I am still investigating user plane
frames
Committed revision 20579.
On 1/27/07, Kriang Lerdsuwanakij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I found out the reason Wireshark refuses to read some .rf file I have.
Those files have zero extra_len in SRCDEST header structure. See the
attached file for example. It was created by selecting some
Committed revision 20580.
On 1/27/07, Kriang Lerdsuwanakij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
This patch add some capability for reading K12xx .rf5 files.
Currently Wireshark has trouble dissecting .rf5 captured from
UMTS ATM-based Iub interface. According to example configuration
file at:
On 1/27/07, Bingyao Du [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Amit
My problem is there are too many fields in only one protocol. So, I want to
split the packet into two independent dissectors. I attached it:)
Trust me they are not that many... take a look at packet-alcap.c (just
one example and see it
from uat.h
* uat mantains a dynamically allocated table accessible to the user
* via a file and/or gui tables.
*
* the file is located either in userdir(when first read or when writen) or
* in datadir for defaults (read only , it will be always written to userdir).
*
* the behaviour of the
On 1/28/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Well, first of all, what problem do you try to solve here?
the lack of an uniform way to deal with tables, they are dealt
differently when they could be dealt in a single uniform way.
I have four diferent examples I wrote myself:
four
does the foo protocol registers a protocol table (foo.port) in its
registration function?
(see packet.h:258)
On 1/28/07, Vladimir Zherdenovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to write a dissector to a foo protocol inside UDP that includes
another goo protocol inside. How can I
for the tip on the sub range creation. I thought that might
work, but when the program was crashing, I was a bit leery about going
beyond the example code I found.
Thanks again for the help.
-Scott
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:42:32 +0100
From: Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wireshark
No luck, I cannot get it to crash by using that data by itself.
could you send me in a capture file with the one packet that caused
the crash so I can study that crash?
Thanks,
Luis
On 1/29/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well the Lua API should intercept those conditions that would
It's been few days that I got wslua's reference manual into the
docbook directory, it's built OK (at least it loos so from here).
What's to be done to add it to the distribution?
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Thank you for your comments, I will follow your advices and request a new
DLT for MTP2 with FCS.
But before, I will, first, ask for the agreement of the board manufacturer.
I hope they will not disagree..
In the same
something ?
Best regards
Florent
Luis Ontanon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Developer support
list for Wireshark
Sent by:
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED
If the DLT is to be a stadard one why not register it?
If it is a private one why not use DLTS USER0..USER15. There's the DLT
User A-D dissector in preferences that allow you to specify any
given dissector to be used against pcap files with those
encapsulations (I often do).
Luis
On 2/5/07,
There's not full DTD support (some features are not implemented, some
DTDs need to be massaged) but there's enough to obtain fileds against
which to filter from a DTD file.
To have your DTD file loaded you can copy it in the dtds/ directory
that you can find in the data directory (the one with
The way things work *.pkt can be in any format, wiretap recognizes
file types by its contents.
Can you be more specific about the file format?
If you use capinfos, what it says about it?
BTW, In order to have it fixed we need two files that show this
behaviour. You could write a bug report on
On 2/11/07, Stephen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:19:46AM +0100, Luis Ontanon wrote:
I plan to write a gui for these tables and the table (or a button to
open an editor window) will appear in preference module.
I noticed that the UAT editor doesn't have a close
I need to implement the identification of retransmitted packets and
calculation of RTT to the sctp dissector.
- Is someone already working on this?
- other than RFC 2960 (sec. 6.3) what other rfcs I must read in order
to implement these?
- are there any caveats I must be aware before starting
Committed revision 20813.
Thanks!
On 2/14/07, Peter Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have provided a patch for a crash that occurs in uat_gui.c if from the
Edit preferences... button when you choose Protocols - DLT_USER -
the Edit... button - the New button - the Cancel button.
The
I got stuck at this point while compiling on windows (MSVC6), what am I missing?
Thanks,
Luis
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Well, this is an odd one... the way ASN1 elements are added to the
tree is somewhat twisted... I'll be investigating how these are
made...
What you want is h248.id that is a byte-string containing the
termination id you are looking for terminationId is something else in
the syntax.
as a rule of
That sounds familiar...
Just today I noticed that if I enable Lua on windows the Tools menu
(that is hidden unless Lua uses it) ends up as a submenu of User
Tables. As in your case this infact does not happen on my mac. The
reason of the different behaviour is still unknown to me.
As I think it
--without-gnutls ?
On 2/22/07, David Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The configure script for wireshark decides that my host has libgnutls, but
since
I am cross-compiling to a target that does not, I want to disable it.
I have tried --disable-libgnutls, LIBGNUTLS_CONFIG=no, and a number
/07, David Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--without-gnutls ?
That was one of the first things I tried. Unfortunately, my host has gnutls
installed, and the configure script finds it despite my admonitions not to.
I tried the following configure
It's heuristic, not having the setup of the association.
I mantain two tables.
pl_table conatinig a list of assocs indexed by port_labels a 32bit
label out of the ports being used (low_pt 16 | high_pt)
and plvt_table indexed by port_label and verification_tag of one
direction which I assume to
Couldn't this be made to be an If-Modified-Since request instead?
Luis
On 2/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20925
User: ulfl
Date: 2007/02/25 03:44 PM
Log:
don't cache the downloaded file, so changes in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luis,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Luis Ontanon wrote:
It's heuristic, not having the setup of the association.
I mantain two tables.
pl_table conatinig a list of assocs indexed by port_labels a 32bit
label out
TSN values are different (by
far) for every direction on every association.
Is there any reason why this should not work?
n 2/24/07, Michael Tuexen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Luis,
see my comments in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Luis Ontanon wrote:
It's
On 2/28/07, Michael Tuexen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20947
User: lego
Date: 2007/02/28 02:09 PM
Log:
SCTP TSN analysis part 1.
Up and running.
As it is
As I'm the one that wrote both the Lua interface and a good part of
the h248 dissector I think I can help you...
There are probably two bugs that cause this crash: one I know already
regarding the way rethrown exceptions are mis-handled in windows which
is the cause of the actual crash. I'm still
Before sending in a huge file can you try a buidbot build = 20972
from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/
I checked in a fix that might solve your issue.
Luis
On 3/4/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I'm the one that wrote both the Lua interface and a good part
of confidentiality.
I'm working for a society whichs works with phone companies and this capture
comes from one of them.
I hope you can still help me.
Joseph Verrière
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Luis Ontanon
Envoyé : dimanche 4 mars 2007 17
On 3/5/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to reverse that change.
It was part of an effort to start refactoring the code so that it
would eventually become possible to multithread wireshark, but the
work required to implement everything required is just too massive to
I think that unless you explain a little better what you are trying to
do no one will be able to help you.
On 3/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i have start an plugin for wireshark 0.99.5
so i need a bit support to complete the plugin
my packet-foo.c is based at the void
Hi,
If you want to discuss about how to write a dissector, how to fix a
bug, about adding a new feature or similar development issues this is
the right forum.
If you ever want your patch applied to the trunk so it is made
available to everyone with the rest of wireshark this is the right
place to
On 3/11/07, Sebastien Tandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanx for reviewing it ... I had forgot about this one :)
I will write the README section soon.
About the memory leak with g_renew, you're right of course.
Unfortunately there is no ep_realloc ... is there any reasons to
Try
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win32/wireshark-setup-0.99.6-SVN-21025.exe
and see if the problem has been fixed.
and, Please try to explain the problem.
On 3/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I am working for a company and we used your source MEGACO/
If they are in the hmac code that's probably my fault when I put it
back in the repo.
I don't think it will be causing any problems, as we do not run in any
16 bit platform guint is either equal to guint32 or larger (64) and
the way the code is written is protected from both endianity and word
I added several packages (and Tandem Free Operation was one of those)
after 0.99.5 was released.
If you try the latest development versions you'll find it decoded.
you can download a build of the latest development version from
http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ .
On 3/16/07, melike
in the hmac function.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Luis Ontanon wrote:
If they are in the hmac code that's probably my fault when I put it
back in the repo.
I don't think it will be causing any problems, as we do not run in any
16 bit platform guint is either equal to guint32 or larger
Inline comments...
On 3/20/07, Martin Mathieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, you don't tend to even notice new warnings that you introduce
on your own platform, as they get lost in the general compilation noise.
Part of the problem (when working from the command-line at least) is
On 3/21/07, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:21 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
How do you mean? Emacs is the only true editor!
No, it's not:
http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html
There *must* be an ed mode for emacs. so the point is that...
After some
That's odd because I checked in changes to packet-sccp.h before those
to voip_calls*.[ch]
see
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-sccp.h?r1=21076r2=21075pathrev=21076diff_format=l
In fact the buildbot seems happy with it.
On 3/21/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL
It depends on when it goes malformed and whether or not the call to
tap_queue_packet() was made or not.
On 3/21/07, Lars Ruoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
if i have a tap listener registered for protocol X, will it be called also
for a malformed packet of protocol X ?
(I.e. a packet which
Simple dissector:
packet-udp.[ch] implements RFC 768
Somewhat complex dissector:
packet-sctp.[ch] implements RFC 2960 and others
Very complex dissector:
packet-xml.[ch] impelements (parts of) http://www.w3.org/XML/
as a rule of thumb most dissectors can be found in epan/dissectors and
On 3/22/07, Neil Piercy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached are patches which provide a basic dissection of Secure RTP/RTCP
profile:
- display of the fields used in the SRTP SRTCP payloads
- deliberate prevention of the normal dissection of the encrypted payloads
- addition of a callable
I got it in my tree, it will be checked in with other changes I have
that I haven't commited yet.
I'll make it optional as the BSSAP, RANAP, TCAP, etc strings are
appended and the column will have the payload's strings out of the
screen. I'll remove the commas and the parenthesis as well.
789
srtp and mickey to have mickey
setup srtp conversations much like sdp does with plain rtp.
L.
On 3/22/07, Neil Piercy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Ontanon
What about heuristics?
is there some
Commited with the aforementioned changes in rev 21126 (with a whole
lot of other stuff).
On 3/22/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got it in my tree, it will be checked in with other changes I have
that I haven't commited yet.
I'll make it optional as the BSSAP, RANAP, TCAP, etc
Which warning?
is it unique to grammar.c or it appears in other lemon generated parsers?
On 3/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21130
User: sfisher
Date: 2007/03/22 11:28 PM
Log:
Remove -Werror under gcc
Sorry about that one...
On 3/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21131
User: ulfl
Date: 2007/03/22 11:29 PM
Log:
fix new warnings
Directory: /trunk/gtk/
ChangesPathAction
+3 -3
gone with rev 21134
On 3/23/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which warning?
is it unique to grammar.c or it appears in other lemon generated parsers?
On 3/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21130
;
conversion supplied
grammar.c(981) : warning C4761: integral size mismatch in argument;
conversion supplied
On 3/23/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gone with rev 21134
On 3/23/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which warning?
is it unique to grammar.c or it appears in other lemon
This should put an end to the buildbot lamenting about files that are
not being considered as mpeg files.
However I'm certain I was way too conservative when choosing what's a
MPEG file (I had just MP3s),
please add more types if you are aware of them.
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Some changes slipped through without me noticing:
Good thing: changes to asn1/ranap, that were commited already with
packet-ranap.[ch]
Neutral thing: changes to makefiles of asn1/snmp and asn1/h248 to add
a target to test compilation.
No bad things
Luis
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now I have to type [Ctrl-Shift-P][p][r][o][RET][fw-arrow][t][c][TAB]
and I can modify TCAP's
prefs.
Tomorrow I'll have to:
[Ctrl-Shift-P][p][r][o][RET][fw-arrow][s][s][RET][fw-arrow][t][c][TAB]
for a keyboard animal like me that's a loss...
On the other hand I know that TCAP is an SS7 protocol
On 3/26/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I finally had a chance to look at the new feature from revision 21066:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=revrevision=21066
and see what it looks like if I put, say, all the SS7 dissectors'
preferences in
On 3/28/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/28/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into
On 3/28/07, Sebastien Tandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files
always compile without any warnings.
Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts :
First part : normal dissectors
Second part : ANS2WRS
though, how do you think it will help?
On 3/28/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There still be the IP addresses in net_src/net_dst. It would be much
like M3UA does that replaces ip src and ip dst by the opc and dpc
(which I do not doubt it is ok).
What I wonder about is whether
On 4/3/07, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 2, 2007, at 3:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21303
User: lego
Date: 2007/04/02 10:17 PM
Log:
There are odd packet records in k15 generated files where the
I do not think other lex than flex would actually work with all our lexers.
As far as the generated dissectors are delivered in the src tarballs
there's no problem, as the source will compile anyway on any POSIX
system. Windows builds require flex and a make clean.
On the other side if I
On 4/3/07, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not think other lex than flex would actually work with all our lexers.
Few minutes later, Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now I'm sure they won't:
from http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/manual/html_chapter/flex_20.html
The following
oops!
compiling on windows!
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21325
User: richardv
Date: 2007/04/03 07:53 PM
Log:
fix an 'unused parameter' warning
Directory: /trunk/epan/
ChangesPath
If you take a look to the attachment
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=605
of bug http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1342
You'll have a perfect example of an evil packet (not malicious but
certainly evil) that causes 4(3?) bugs to be triggered.
This malformed
Depends,
once the context is set up lower, higher addresses and context-id.
if the contextid is choose it uses another table with the
transactionid instead to bind the first transaction.
in current svn the code used to track the context is in epan/gcp.[ch]
it was in packet-h248.c till the last
That applies to ISUP as well, I've always wondered about the reason
behind this oddity.
On 4/10/07, Michael Lum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably even worse than that!
In both GSM and CDMA protocols packed BCD can be represented as:
digit2 digit1
digit4 digit3
such that two octets:
H.248.1 p. 8.3 (Messages) states:
An H.248.1 entity (MG/MGC) must consistently use the same MID in all
messages it originates for the duration of control association with
the peer (MGC/MG).
But using the MID only might not suffice as we'll know only the
message sender, there's no simple way to
On 4/11/07, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Balint Reczey (IJ/ETH) wrote:
The attached patch adds ability of reading Little Endian encoded IPv4
addresses to the Lua plugin.
What exactly are the semantics of TvbRange_get_ipv4() and
TvbRange_get_le_ipv4() supposed to be?
The current
] wrote:
Luis Ontanon wrote:
Please verify this assumption:
I should not do any processing on the bytes of an IPv4 address because
regardless of endianity it is always interpreted as a guint8[4] where
[0] contains the first byte. so that 10.11.12.13 would always be
stored regardless
Other than these I think
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1531 should be
addressed as well, Although its consequences aren't fatal It looks
very ugly.
On 4/12/07, Anders Broman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As Luis noted:
Everyone that has touched the dfilter engine
before SET_ADDRESS().
Could you commit it, too?
Regards,
Balint
From: Luis Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:27:48 +0200
Well I replaced tvb_get_ntohs() with tvb_get_ipv4().
Balint:
Can you test the changes to tvbrange:get_ipv4() in your code and
verify
Can you gzip the patches, some MUAs (e.g. google mail) mangle the text
attachments in a way that patches become unusable.
Luis.
On 4/13/07, Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i took the time to polish the redback dissector a little and decode some
more protocols:
Index:
Thanks,
However equivalent changes were already made (among others) in revision
21337. Other than that, the file was moved into epan/dissectors in r21191
.
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-megaco.c?r1=21337r2=21336pathrev=21337
On 4/13/07, Maurizio
I been fighting for quite a while, TRYing to figure out a way to have
both exception handling mechanisms that are used in windows.
First and mostly we use our macros based on kazlib's exception code
(which build arround ANSI's setjmp and longjmp).
Then for catching exceptional exceptions
svn up svn up -r 12345 file
On 4/18/07, Martin Mathieson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does look like the same problem.
Their report says that a problem of this kind was fixed in
gcc-3.4.4-2{,.fc3}, so either its the same problem not fixed in
vanilla gcc-3.4.6 or another problem with similar
There's a function in packet-iuup.c (by the same name) which has (what
i believe to be) a more consistent signature with the rest of
proto_tree_add_* functions should that be used instead?
Other than that the one for iuup allows for bit strings not aligned to
the octet boundary.
On 4/24/07,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
