Re: [Wt-interest] [ExtJS] Ext:: Controls are not displayed at all

2008-11-07 Thread Koen Deforche
Hey Dushan, 2008/11/7 Dushan Savich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: When I create my own example, only normal controls ( Wt:: ) are displayed, but Wt::Ext:: are not . I've zipped wt_config.xml , kitchen sink example output , and directory listing of ext/folder. You can

Re: [Wt-interest] Wt licensing

2008-11-07 Thread Anthony Roger Buck
From the POV of the Wt guys, what classifies as re-distribution? If i want to develop a site that makes use of the framework that is entirely owned by me, run by me and serves on servers owned by me, do i need to make available my source? Roj Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Quoting Brad Hubbard

Re: [Wt-interest] [SOLVED] Re: [ExtJS] Ext:: Controls are not displayed at all

2008-11-07 Thread Wim Dumon
2008/11/7 Dushan Savich [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Koen, I really got tired thanking you in these couple of days , so I won't do it this time : รพ Btw, is the latest Wt version compatible with boost 1.36? I mean, does it compile out of the box , i.e. without much of the brain activity

Re: [Wt-interest] Wt licensing (was: Re: Where can I download extjs version 2.1 ?)

2008-11-07 Thread Koen Deforche
Hey Pau, 2008/11/7 Pau Garcia i Quiles [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dushan Savich wrote: It would be a lot easier to just deploy ExtJS 2.02 with witty , wouldn't it :) ? Dushan Dushan, Consider the licensing issues involved. Now that's a good question, really. ExtJS used to be LGPLv2 +

Re: [Wt-interest] Wt licensing

2008-11-07 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Quoting Anthony Roger Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: With the current licensing model (GPLv2 + commercial), no, you do not need to make your source available. From the POV of the Wt guys, what classifies as re-distribution? If i want to develop a site that makes use of the framework that is

Re: [Wt-interest] [ExtJS] Ext:: Controls are not displayed at all

2008-11-07 Thread Dushan Savich
Brad, I use Wt 2.1.5 . XML seems to be fixed, but in source ( ExtKitchenApplication.C ) it still stands "Menu ToolBar" . Since Wt is under GPL , I've took the liberty too alter the source and fix that :) . But, It still doesn't work. Dushan Brad Hubbard wrote: Dushan Savich

[Wt-interest] maillist

2008-11-07 Thread misi e
Hello, maybe I messed up (or google did) my filters in google mail (however I double checked), *but I am not getting anymore emails from the list. can you pls. check if I am on the list?* Thanks Misi - This SF.Net email is

Re: [Wt-interest] Great product

2008-11-07 Thread Koen Deforche
Hey Daniel, 2008/11/7 Daniel Derr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just starting experimenting with witty, and it is working great so far. Are there any books available for Wt? Additionally, is there a list of Witty experts out there who may be interested in doing a wt project? This mailing-list is

[Wt-interest] [SOLVED] Re: [ExtJS] Ext:: Controls are not displayed at all

2008-11-07 Thread Dushan Savich
Koen, I really got tired thanking you in these couple of days , so I won't do it this time : Btw, is the latest Wt version compatible with boost 1.36? I mean, does it compile out of the box , i.e. without much of the brain activity :) ? Cheers! Dushan Koen Deforche wrote: Hey