I'd say its something to do with this bug...
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html
Cheers,
James Silva
Web Production
Gruden Pty Ltd
Tel: 02 9299 9462
Fax: 02 9299 9463
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.gruden.com
One other thing... You may want to try a doctype that doesn't trigger quirks
mode.
For HTML 4.01 Transitional...
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
Cheers,
James Silva
Web Production
Gruden Pty
I'm out of ideas - anyone got any?
Hi Kay...
I fiddled around with this and found that if you put the ul into a div like
this
#container{padding-bottom: 5px;}
the bottom border seems to show up for some reason or other BUT then of
course you lose the 1px white border to the right ...but that
Hey Kay,
add a float: left to your li class.
B
Kay Smoljak wrote:
I'm trying to convert an image and table based navigation to a styled text list. I
have it looking exactly the way I want in Firefox, but IE6 is refusing to display the
bottom-border on the list item and the anchor within it (I'm
dammit - sorry kay, I just saw the rest of your message.
B
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Miles,
Replace your existing #content selector with the following:
#content {
margin-left: 0;
float : left;
padding: 0;
border: 1px dashed #090;
}
Slightly different way of achieving the result you're after.
Cheers,
James Silva
Web
Nelson Ford wrote:
The
reason I brought this up was...this is a really interesting and
pertinent topic at this point as XHTML and CSS start to become the rule
rather than the exception.
I wasn't even sure if browsers actually read
the DTD to allow this to work.
The only thing that
James wrote:
Miles,
Replace your existing #content selector with the following:
#content {
margin-left: 0;
float : left;
padding: 0;
border: 1px dashed #090;
}
Slightly different way of achieving the result you're after.
If it
I appreciate everyone's input. I think I will definitely remove the 'ahem'
statement.
Will Chatham
Webmaster
Ingles Markets
ooOo-o
828.669.2941 - ext.534
www.ingles-markets.com
--
I personally wouldn't include this kind of message, but if I
were going
Hi all,
I tried to build a portfolio site using web standards code, more or less.
The site consists of a main page for primary navigation and logo with two
inline frames for content/subnav pages.
I didnt use tables on the main page, only css positioning and i had to use
different style sheets
Here you go, Kevin
http://www.insert-title.com/web_design/?page=articles/dev/multi_IE
I've use IE 5.1 5.5 and they quite happily coexist with IE6 and my other
browser connections.
Mike Pepper
http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
You have all been so patient and immensely helpful as I've waded through
the creation of the new section of our site. Here I go again --
This is probably only going to reveal my total lack of understanding the
basics of CSS positioning, but you're such generous teachers, I'm going
to just go
Barb,
Try this:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/ppc.htm
It is rough as hell and there are many other ways you could do it but it
meets your basic needs. Keep in mind that the recent IE's do not support
min-width.
Russ
You have all been so patient and immensely helpful as I've waded
Hi Barbara,
For starters, you might remove the min-width from your #id's. Those will
keep the page from being as liquid as possible, which you said you want. I
realize you don't want images in your #rh-col to overlap or be crunched
somehow, but if you target your whole layout to fit a minimum
wow, thanks! This teaches me so much!
--
Barbara Dozetos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Physician's Computer CompanyMarketing Team
1 Main St., Ste 7 802-846-5532
Winooski, VT 05404
*
The discussion list for
If this is a well known tip, then I apologise for
adding a unnecessarymail to thisWSG list.
However, in all my research on CSS, I have never
before seen this tip on applying multiple CSS classes to an object.
Please see: http://weblogs.asp.net/asmith/archive/2004/02/02/66360.aspx
-Original Message-
Barbara wrote:
www.pcc.com/benchmark/
The challenge (s):
1) keep the page as 'liquid' as possible
2) make the #navcontainer and #rh-col line up at the top edges,
regardless of how deep the #hdr div gets when someone decides to
increase font-size.
3) maintain a
The only thing that makes XHTML something slightly different from XML is it's DTD.
Kind of like saying: The only thing that makes females something slightly different from humans is their anatomical differences. The whole point of XHTML is that besides being HTML, it's also well formed XML.
I
Take the following sentence: Mark went to the store and bought
eggs,
milk, bread, chicken, rice, and corn. Doesn't that sentence contain
a
unordered list?
Good point. I'm still not in agreement that ul/ol's should be
nested in p's though. Maybe someone can clarify in the discussion
how
Paul Ingraham wrote:
the wrapping text seems to accommodate changes in the BOTTOM margin of the
sidebar just fine. So why on earth can't the flowing text work with an
altered TOP margin?
If I can't build what I want, I hope to at least understand why!
Forget my previous post.
I've gone all the
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:03:52 +0800, SomeNewKid wrote:
http://weblogs.asp.net/asmith/archive/2004/02/02/66360.aspx
It has to be used carefully, however.
If we had
foo {
border: 1px solid black;
}
.bar {
border: 2px dashed red;
}
class=foo bar
then it is undefined which has greter specifity
Mark Stanton wrote:
Could you convert:
window
titlebarmycontent/titlebar
contentmycontent/content /window
into: div class="window"
div class="titlebar"mycontent/div div
class="content"mycontent/div /div
using XSL?
Mark (and Scott),
not having noticed the original post I'm a
wouldnt you need to use the xml doctype if your using xml ?
or the xml prologue as its called.?
Heyas,
Still finding my feet with XHTML / CSS. I noticed that in Mozilla (well
through Eric Meyers new book) you can introduce your own tags (ie XML)
and basically in many ways can attach CSS
Lea de Groot wrote:
It has to be used carefully, however.
If we had
foo {
border: 1px solid black;
}
.bar {
border: 2px dashed red;
}
class=foo bar
then it is undefined which has greter specifity (sp?)
Both have the same specifity.
The last one overrides the first one.
--
Kristof
It is spelled 'specificity' (I can spell it but cannot say it to save my
life).
In your example, they both have the same specificity so it comes down to the
order in which they were specified in your css file. In your example '.bar'
would be used as it is specified later in the css file. If we
25 matches
Mail list logo
