On 7 okt 2004, at 20.42, Genau Junior wrote:
I´m having some dificulty to set the size of [input=file] form element.
I can set the width through CSS on Mozzila, but IE cant set the size
that i formated on CSS file.
Anyone can help me how i set a size on INPUT FILE on both browsers?
Styling form
Hi
I'm a little bit new to css and I'm trying to make my personal blog with a
tableless layout.
I'm made a layout with a centered fixed width div container and two float
div's, one for contents and one one for menu with a different background
color.
Everything it's ok except when contents
Can we have a URL?
This will help others to help you!
Just a quick review of best practice when asking for help on any list (not
just WSG):
1. If possible, set up a sample page that shows just the problem in action.
2. Validate your HTML code
3. Validate your CSS code
4. Test the page on a
Title: RE: [WSG] 2 columns layout
Javier
One technique I have found very useful is called 'Faux Columns'
Try the following link for a good overview.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/
Peter Goddard
Web Developer/IT
PSI Global Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Javier
On 10/8/2004 at 7:45 PM russ - maxdesign wrote:
Can we have a URL?
This will help others to help you!
Hi
Thanks for your reply.
I'll try to make a sample page on line...
Regards
jl
**
The discussion list for
Hi,
I'm wondering what tools Mac developers out there use? I'm basically and
windows and linux person, but will get a small iBook for travelling and
testing on next week. I'll be OS in Nov/Dec and need to still do some work,
so I need to be able to work pretty comfortably on the Mac. On
Ian Hickson is _not_ saying XHTML is harmful, he is saying that
serving up XHTML with the wrong MIME type is bad.
I've read the article and what I don't understand is that if it is so
bad why is it acceptable to the Validator?
I write my pages in XHTML with a XHTML 1.1 doctype and send the
Hi,
Could you please help me on this one?
I've been trying to workaround a semantic problem in a site.
Since the is intended to be used as a template, I intend to use only text
and background on the header.
To avoid low contrast situations, I decided to use an absolute positioned
div
Geoff,
The text editors I know of for the Mac are (in rough order):
1) BBEdit. King pin. Expensive but comprehensive, with Web Preview.
http://www.barebones.com
2) skEdit. Popular, shareware http://www.skti.org/skEdit.php
3) SubEthaEdit. Includes collaborative feature.
All,
To each his own.
Check your site stats or your intended audience. Don't break your
neck/budget over a non-issue.
And my point was that those browsers' designs was bad/flawed, not the
design of the sites we are building. And also it was IMHO.
Tom
I have not tried this, but it received good remarks in a recent
Macworld article...
http://www.tumultco.com/HyperEdit/
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
Get FireFox http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=0t=1
On Oct 8, 2004, at
I've added a top of page link as follows:
div class=topla href=#headerTop of page/a/div
and related CSS, as follows:
.topl {
float: right;
font-size: .75em;}
a.topl {
color: #660;
text-decoration: none;}
Everything validates (apart from an IE expression that I've removed but
On Friday, Oct 8, 2004, at 23:37 Australia/Sydney, Richard Lake wrote:
I've added a top of page link as follows:
div class=topla href=#headerTop of page/a/div
and related CSS, as follows:
.topl {
float: right;
font-size: .75em;}
a.topl {
color: #660;
text-decoration: none;}
Wrong link? ;-))
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Richard Lake
Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:38
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [WSG] top of page link class not taking effect
I've added a top of page link as follows:
div
Upon a little test run, the live preview of the code (literally 'as you
type') is neat. This looks like it might be a pain for a small screen
though. I have a 17 Studio Display, and i wasn't fond of the amount of
room I had to code in. Still nice though.
Great! Even more issues... I don't have a Mac for testing - so I'm blind from
that pov. Help on points 1-5 anyone?... please?!
- Lorenzo
On Thursday 07 October 2004 16:28, Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Lorenzo wrote:
URL: http://196.36.166.35/tower
CSS: http://196.36.166.35/tower/s/tower.css
G'day
div class=topla href=#headerTop of page/a/div and related
CSS, as follows:
a.topl {
color: #660;
text-decoration: none;}
The reason this doesn't do anything is that a.topl means an anchor with the
class topl, which is not what you have above (you applied the class to the
div,
thanks for responding. I've just tried that locally and it didn't make any
difference? Richard
Well, but it is a better way to see the whole html and css. May be there is
something else, which overrides your classes or id's. ;-)
R.
D.
**
The
G'day
it's the appearance of the link that's the problem.
And the cause is inheritance and specificity, or something like that. The
formatting seems to come from the following rules:
#content a {
color: #000;
text-decoration: underline;}
#content a:hover {
color: #cc9;
You do remember that any link that refers to an anchor on the same page is
by definition a visited link don't you. You can't just set
text-decoration:none; on the link, you have to make sure it's set on the
visited link too.
Could that be the cause? Do you have some styling related to visited
Not forgetting Style Master http://www.westciv.com/style_master/
Hugh Todd wrote:
Geoff,
The text editors I know of for the Mac are (in rough order):
1) BBEdit. King pin. Expensive but comprehensive, with Web Preview.
http://www.barebones.com
2) skEdit. Popular, shareware
Hello,
I know that its already be posted but the tutorial at
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/
is very helpful when it comes to two column layouts.
You can also make the entire site fixed width and height. I;m not to
sure how you've designed your site but you could add a container
Paul Connolley wrote:
Geoff Deering wrote:
I am talking about CSS applied to HTML and the rendering of the CSS as
applied to the parsing of the document. But still, strictly speaking,
an
XML based document is bound to be more semantically correct because it
is
well formed.
What Dean says so well here are also the reasons I prefer XML defined
markup, and I don't think it negates the arguments that others have been
expressing here for HTML. I think each on of them have valid points. But
it seems to me that there are more reasons to use an XML based vocabulary
than
From:Of Alan Milnes
Ian Hickson is _not_ saying XHTML is harmful, he is saying that
serving up XHTML with the wrong MIME type is bad.
I've read the article and what I don't understand is that if it is so
bad why is it acceptable to the Validator?
I write my pages in XHTML with a XHTML
From: Kristof Rutten
Hi Geoff,
I've 'switchted' sides in March of this year and haven't returned to
my old Win-platofrm ;)
Yes, I suspect it could happen to me too, especially when you have the best
of both worlds; Mac front end, and *nix backend, although I really do like
GNOME and KDE.
I have a 19 and 21 for development, so I'll just KVM the iBook (can't
afford a Powerbook)
Thanks
Upon a little test run, the live preview of the code (literally 'as you
type') is neat. This looks like it might be a pain for a small screen
though. I have a 17 Studio Display, and i wasn't fond
From: Andy Budd
Not forgetting Style Master http://www.westciv.com/style_master/
Andy Budd
Yeah, I was waiting for that one to come up.
Thanks
Geoff
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Paul, your CSS doesn't validate. This is failing:
div.sidebar {border-left: 1px solid #ccc; width: 200px; float: right;
padding-left: 5px; padding-vertical-align:text-top;}
Error: Property padding-vertical-align doesn't exist : text-top
Remember to validate!
The problem with IE5 lies with your
From: Andy Budd
Not forgetting Style Master http://www.westciv.com/style_master/
Andy Budd
Yeah, I was waiting for that one to come up.
Thanks Andy and Geoff
Review comparing Mac CSS Editors at the bible MacWorld here
http://www.macworld.com/2004/07/reviews/cascadingstylesheeteditors/?
Just ro reiterate. Style Master rocks! Nothing come close to it. I
switched a few months back and only ever use my windows box sparingly.
There is no coming back from a PowerBook! While I use BBEdit a lot I
do like Xpad a whole lot too for quick edits etc
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 08:52:28 +1000, John
Geoff Deering wrote:
I am talking about CSS applied to HTML and the rendering of the CSS as
applied to the parsing of the document. But still, strictly speaking,
an
XML based document is bound to be more semantically correct because it
is
well formed. This means that the CSS can be applied
I really like SubEthaEdit!
http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 11:20:42 +1000, Amit Karmakar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ro reiterate. Style Master rocks! Nothing come close to it. I
switched a few months back and only ever use my windows box sparingly.
There is no
33 matches
Mail list logo
