Hi all,
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
We are launching a new XHTML/CSS based CMS soon and would really appreciate
your comments. We have launched the brochureware site already, and the CMS
is 99% finished, it will launch mid Jan 2005.
I look forward to your response!
Kind Regards
Jacobus van
Thanks James, I think the answer to my original question is yes, but, use it
but with caution / watch out for bugs.
The site itself will actually be populated by myself pre handover to the
client, they will then just be using contribute to make updates and
alterations to the pages, and if I set
On 12/15/04 11:59 PM Jacobus van Niekerk [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
We are launching a new XHTML/CSS based CMS soon and would really appreciate
your comments. We have launched the brochureware site already, and the CMS
is 99% finished, it will launch mid
One of the main problems with the WA gov sites is that a little over two years
ago a large number of govt departments got amalgamated. Most of my peers have
spent the last couple of years trying to get three, four or more sites into a
single logical structure (and boy it is fun with all the
Title: RE: [WSG] Site review plz
Dear Jacobus
The site looks good to me. I also followed the link to Catics.
On the about us page you have the word 'ourselfs' (ourselves!) and webstandards is two words not hyphenated either (I hate that). I haven't looked for any more.
Am I too
W3C CSS Validator Results for http://www.azapi.com/index.php?id=21
To work as intended, your CSS style sheet needs a correct document parse
tree. This means you should use valid HTML.
Errors
URI : http://www.azapi.com/types/compAzapiWebsite/css/structure.css
Line: 184 Context : h1#logo a
Invalid
I see the difference instead, running firefox 1.0 on windows xp service
pack 2
Your two example pages look identical to me.
Running Firefox 1.0 on Windows XP
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:18:49 +0100, JohnyB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It looks that the body style is applied only to the content area,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I must admit I'm growing rather weary of all the negative remarks
about Dreamweaver.
I too am a Dreamweaver user. However on OS X at least, the preview mode
still isn't up to scratch, although it is better than the previous
version.
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
Are you
G'day
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
Reviewing the home page only. Firefox 1.0 on Win2K, dial-up connection.
The page took a long time to load. Looks like one of those if you don't
have cable or ADSL we don't want your business type of sites.
It does look good when it eventually finishes
IE7 works very well indeed. The print style sheets problem can be overcome,
I believe, but another problem exists - you cannot use a stylesheet switcher
because it overrides the CSS that is used to fix IE.
Simon Jessey
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Email: [EMAIL
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
Reviewing the home page only. Firefox 1.0 on Win2K, dial-up connection.
The page took a long time to load. Looks like one of those if you
don't
have cable or ADSL we don't want your business type of sites.
I suggest converting top and bottom backgrounds to JPEG.
FYI,
I'd like to remain a member on the website but do not
have time to read any emails at the moment. I'm
unsubscribing, hope you dont take it personally. Would
seem like a good idea (tm) to maintain membership but
not email people.
Thanks and Regards
Rajib
dunno,
gave up waiting after about 10 seconds - and i'm on a 1MB line
!
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Sabrina
xxxSent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 03:12To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] SiteCheck
please
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:37:49 +0100, Nick Verstappen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the noscript tag not allowed anymore in XHTML 1.0 Strict? I'm trying
to use it, but it does not validate. If it IS allowed, what markup
should I use to make it validate? Many thanks!
Ofcourse it is allowed.
Hi,
first of all, greetings and let me introduce myself.
I'm Carlos Rincón a web programmer of Neurotic
(http://www.neuroticweb.com), a spanish web designers company.
I've just made a frontend of Hard Grog Cafe CSS rounded box generator.
http://www.neuroticweb.com/recursos/css-rounded-box/
I'll
Nick Verstappen wrote:
Is the noscript tag not allowed anymore in XHTML 1.0 Strict? I'm trying
to use it, but it does not validate. If it IS allowed, what markup
should I use to make it validate? Many thanks!
Nick, you need to format it like this:
div
script type='text/javascript'
Hi,
At the following url:
http://working.ckimedia.com/index.php
The delay when loading the background is giving me pause. Is this delay
a huge usability issue, or has my quest become retentive?
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing is not enough, you
Sabrina xxx wrote:
http://PirateQueen.tk http://piratequeen.tk/
let me know what you think :)
xx
%@ Import Namespace=PopIdol %
%@ Register TagPrefix=Critic TagName=Simon Assembly=dlls\Simon.ascx %
Critic:SimonCowell class=Harsh runat=server
Frames?
Animated Gifs?
Big
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
div
script type='text/javascript' src='java.js'/script
noscript
diva href=nojava.htmlNo JavaScript user link/a/div
/noscript
/div
Even better would be to remove the script tag from the body and put it
in the head (with the code itself in an external
Good stuff, just what I needed. I have an implementation of rounded corners
that doesn't work when I use it in e-newsletters and open in Outlook. Will
give this a try.
Thanks,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carlos Rincon Sanchez
Chris,
You should at least add a (white, or light grey) background color to the
body or div with the main content. If you do, users can start reading
the content even when the background isn't loaded yet (or does nog load
at all).
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
At the following url:
http://PirateQueen.tk http://piratequeen.tk/
let me know what you think :)
admin, close this thread. it has NOTHING to do with webstandards.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Post below:
Michael Wilson wrote:
I use Dreamweaver MX 2004 and, although I'm not certain what settings I
may have changed since the initial install, I don't recall making any
major adjustments to the preferences since that time. I believe I ticked
on Make document XHTML compliant and set the
Chris Kennon wrote:
Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing
the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation.
Just for comparison, I took the image into PaintShopPro (yes, I'm too cheap
to own Photoshop right now) and saved the image in JPEG
You can drop the image to 23K with a decent JPEG converter. The fact that
it's a background means just that: it's subordinate to content. I have
http://www.xat.com/ in my graphics manipulation armoury. Still the best
after 3 years.
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer
Internet SEO and Marketing
We have plenty of forms on our site and they all behave pretty well, except our
search box. The coding is exactly the same, the style sheets are the same, but
the text input box is huge!
http://www.csatravelprotection.com/csa/help.do
The only variation is the form action. It is referencing a
Large images are almost always better off as jpegs. The exception being
images that use lots of flat color and/or text.
Photoshop's Save for web features easily got this image down to 37K with
similar visible quality.
But you certainly don't need Photoshop. There are many shareware/freeware
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:19:48 -0600, Charles Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chris Kennon wrote:
Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing
the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation.
Just for comparison, I took the image into PaintShopPro
Hi,
For this kind of images jpg works a lot better (keeping that kind of
photographic detail). I used fireworks keeping a good quality and the
file is 50kb.
I can send the file if you want.
bye
Laura
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:19:48 -0600, Charles Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Kennon
On Thursday, December 16, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing
the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation.
CK
Thanks for the compliment on the background. Any other suggestions or
critique of
russ - maxdesign wrote:
Start at the beginning. If you want to style every a element on the page,
you can do:
a:link { color: red;}
Not quite true; that will only style anchors which have a href
attribute. If, for some reason you have one without a href (although I
can't think of a good reason
Hi Everyone
This brings up a good topic.
Apparently, my problem arises from creating a div with an id=search to place
a search box in part of the page. This is currently commented out.
Then, I used search as the id of an input field to relate to a label.
So, the input is grabbing the styles
Not quite true; that will only style anchors which have a href
attribute. If, for some reason you have one without a href (although I
can't think of a good reason to have an anchor without a href for which
there isn't a better, more semantic alternative), it *will not* be styled.
Yes,
What would you recommend is the best way to create a form with a submit
button made up of text+image? So what I have planned is the word
Search followed by a little icon. The user can click either of them
and the form will submit.
I am playing with multiple solutions, but have not found anything
What if at the first place you write in the document:
input type=submit value=Search
Which should be OK for any klient.
And, if the browser happens to support DOM correctly,
you remove it with Javascript and replace with:
a href=javascript:submitForm()Search/a
input type=image src=button.gif
But I have noticed some browsers completely ignore input styles.
Yes, but it is partly a good thing - some elements should really be
rendered by the system GUI...
See http://www.pixy.cz/blog/obrazky/styled-forms.gif for comparison.
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz |
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
What would you recommend is the best way to create a form with a submit
button made up of text+image? So what I have planned is the word
Search followed by a little icon. The user can click either of them
and the form will submit.
I am playing with multiple solutions, but
SOLUTION 1:
BUTTON
Search img src=button.gif alt=Search
/BUTTON
Problem: Doesn't work in older browsers (e.g. NN4).
Eh, another good solution spoiled by this zombie.
a href=javascript:submitForm()Search/a
Forget hackish href=javascript:. Use onclick instead.
To make this less evil you could put
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:02:25 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a class .pmi in my page and I want style the first line of
differently so that the first line is smaller than the second line. The
code below doesn't seem to work and I was wondering if it was because of
the
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:02:25 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.pmi p:first-line {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
this should be:
p.pmi:first-line {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
But using the 'br' isn't any good too. Maybe this line with
the br should be instead a heading followed with a paragraph?
Rene
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:52:15 -0800, Andreas Boehmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you recommend is the best way to create a form with a submit
button made up of text+image? So what I have planned is the word
Search followed by a little icon. The user can click either of them
and the form
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 01:41:27 -, Rene Saarsoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But using the 'br' isn't any good too. Maybe this line with
the br should be instead a heading followed with a paragraph?
Depending on how many of these items there are, a definition list
might work well also.
--
May
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:32:15 +0800, Vicki Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP however even that will be limited by the CMS they are going
to use. /SNIP
Why do organisations (be they private or public) continue to blame a
CMS for things like poor validity and accessibility? Choosing a CMS
that
Generally if the submit button is just a stylised button with search
or submit as foreground text then I show them some mockups that style
the button using css (removing the border, using a background image).
If it's more complex than that, with an icon or a non-standard font then
a carefully
Hello,
If I have an XHTML document containing tags in the order:
h1Heading One/h1
pParagraph/p
h2Heading Two/h2
pParagraph/p
How are these tags styled with CSS so that there are positioned in and
out of order on the page with no relation to each other.. but when
viewed in a text browser it
Hi,
Michael Wilson wrote:
What would you consider to be the key standards and accessibility
settings for Dreamweaver that some of us might be overlooking?
The settings I recommend to people at work
Accessibility tab:
Enable all of the Show Attributes when Inserting options
Code Format
Tim Burgan wrote:
How are these tags styled with CSS so that there are positioned in and
out of order on the page with no relation to each other.. but when
viewed in a text browser it viewed in it's original order.
It can be done using a combination of floats, positioning, and margins
The problem is the input style doesn't work in all browsers. In
particular Opera and some of the Mac browsers will ignore them, if I
remember correctly.
Current version of Opera does excellent job with styling input elements.
Opera even lets you change border on checkbox elements. I haven't
Hi Everyone!
This is my first post to this group after reading it for a
while. I must say, Im kinda scared to post to you guys! However, I really need your help.
I think I may have found the Holy Grail that
3-column css liquid layout that allows for different colors and/or
Title: Re: [WSG] The Holy Grail ... CSS Liquid
Three-Column Layou
I think I
may have found the Holy Grail that 3-column css liquid
layout
What I need
help with is this: I have checked this out on Mozilla, FireFox,
Netscape, and IE all on the pc. Can anyone who is interested
please check it out
The problem is the input style doesn't work in all browsers. In
particular Opera and some of the Mac browsers will ignore them, if I
remember correctly.
Current version of Opera does excellent job with styling input elements.
Hmmm... I have tried to hide the border of an input field
Checked (OK)
Safari 1.2.4 OS X (Mac)
Opera 6.0.3 (Mac)
Netscape 7.1 OS X (Mac)
Minor bugs
IE 5.2 OS X (Mac): extra padding added to the width of the left and
right columns
Screenshot: http://www.motive.co.nz/temp/041217-hoygrail.gif
(could be a known CSS bug related to IE
I love the implementation of the HTML and CSS.
But um, could you please turn off HTML in your email?
THE AMAZINGLY LARGE TYPE IS SENDING ME BLIND.
Thanks :)
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:33:58 -0600, Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checked (OK)
Safari 1.2.4 OS X (Mac)
Opera
Anyone come up with, or implemented, a 3-column layout of this sort in
which the left and right columns also stretch as a percentage of the
page width?
-Hugh Todd
I think I may have found the Holy Grail that 3-column css liquid
layout that allows for different colors and/or backgrounds for
Hi
This thread is closed and the thread starter has been removed by Russ (again).
Reminder:
When responding to a site check, please use constructive criticism.
Destructive criticism is scaring off our new members from posting.
If you really don't like a page/site, take it off list.
Cheers
Dreamweaver does, however, still fail on the object tag, especilly for
the Flash template.
Hi David
Have your tried exporting a compliant template from Flash itself? Not
sure if you can do this in DW?
I did some experiments in this last year
http://www.webqs.com/experiment.php?id=15
first of all, greetings and let me introduce myself.
I'm Carlos Rincón a web programmer of Neurotic
(http://www.neuroticweb.com), a spanish web designers company.
I've just made a frontend of Hard Grog Cafe CSS rounded box generator.
http://www.neuroticweb.com/recursos/css-rounded-box/
Hi
The correct syntax is
border : none;
Cheers
James
input{border:0;}
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
Russ
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi all
Remember to put the ean.css on the end! I was marvelling at a
fantastic page of unstyled content (which shows how table free code is
useful when styles are turned off!) then saw the URL was incomplete...
Cheers
James
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:18 +1100, russ - maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hang on a sec.. Ill just pick my jaw up of the ground
Thats amazing.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:18 +1100, russ - maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION TITLES
In print the name of a publication is typically type-set in an
oblique or italic font. A similar *visual* effect can be achieved
either through the use of:
- an italic font-tag iPublication/i (probably deprecated)
- an emphasis tag emPublication/em
-
Maybe I'm not fully understanding your question, but what about having a
class (call it pub or whatever) and then defining font-style: italic
in the CSS?
Leslie Riggs
SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION TITLES
In print the name of a publication is typically type-set in an oblique
or italic font. A
A few other things to be aware of with Contribute 3:
You cannot edit pages that use server side includes. To be able to see
the page in it's entirety, you have to instead use Dreamweaver
Templates of Library Items.
Doing this then ties you to Macromedia's proprietary standards ,
rather than
Hi
The correct syntax is
border : none;
Cheers
James
input{border:0;}
Thanks, but even that does not seem to work in my version of Opera.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Russ,
I see it beautifully in Safari, but in Firefox only a blue background
and tiny Times Roman text. What the...?
-Hugh Todd
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/
cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION TITLES
In print the name of a publication is typically type-set in an oblique
or italic font. A similar *visual* effect can be achieved either
through the use of:
- an italic font-tag iPublication/i (probably deprecated)
- an emphasis tag emPublication/em
-
Worked a treat in Friefox Win. Really lovely.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:28:30 +1100, Hugh Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ,
I see it beautifully in Safari, but in Firefox only a blue background
and tiny Times Roman text. What the...?
-Hugh Todd
Maybe I'm not fully understanding your question, but what about
having a class (call it pub or whatever) and then defining
font-style: italic in the CSS?
Creating a custom class will yield the desired visual effect, however
the class pub has no semantic value.
Compare this to text marked-up
I would use the CITE tag, quoteCite: contains a citation or a reference to
other sources/quote (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4?struct/text.html#h-9.2.1)
if this is what you're after.
Cheers
Jeff
On 17/12/04 4:05 PM, Andy Kirkwood | MOTIVE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION
Works fine in my copy of Firefox.
Very nice crab.
Gary
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:28:30 +1100, Hugh Todd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I I see it beautifully in Safari, but in
Firefox only a blue background
and tiny Times Roman text. What the...?
**
The
Cite isn't really appropriate is it?
CITE:
Contains a citation or a reference to other sources
So you are not referencing a source, just mentioning a publication.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:31:22 +1300 (NZDT), Mike Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION TITLES
In
Now THIS is what makes designing with CSS fun!! I just love this.
Leslie Riggs
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
Russ
**
The discussion
Natalie Buxton said:
Cite isn't really appropriate is it?
CITE:
Contains a citation or a reference to other sources
So you are not referencing a source, just mentioning a publication.
well, I think it *is* a reference to [an]other source. Although I think
the specs could be clearer!
OK,
Maybe I shouldn't have installed the final version of Firefox without
deleting earlier versions and/or support files. You've prompted me to
delete Firefox's Application Support. Revisiting the site... I see the
crab! I see it all! And the blue background is more seamless than in
the
Hi Natalie et al,
We here at Cube 7 just finished ArtsEdge, a WA Government Department
site. It's all fancy pants standard xhtml and css (with a smidge of
flash) and uses Contribute for its CMS along with some custom backend
for the events module.
check it out:
Title: Re: [WSG] Semantic markup for publication
titles
CITE:
Contains a citation or a reference to other
sources
So you are not referencing a source, just
mentioning a publication.
Seems that the intended use is stretched to include marking-up a
publication title using the cite tag (when not
Dublin Core has a working group that have spent a lot of time on this.
they didn't get very far for a long time but recently they seem to have
got it right - I suggest you take a look there.
http://dublincore.org/groups/citation (I think)
There is a difference between citation and related
You can edit pages which contain SSI's, just not any of the content IN
the SSI's. This is the perfect way to lock parts of the design you
don't want the client to touch. No need for DW Templates at all! :)
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:22:38 +1100, David McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few other
Hey David
You cannot edit pages that use server side includes. To be able to see
the page in it's entirety, you have to instead use Dreamweaver
Templates of Library Items.
Huh? You can't edit content that is being included, so if I have
mypage.shtml and includes header.html, I can edit the
You can edit pages which contain SSI's, just not any of the content IN
the SSI's. This is the perfect way to lock parts of the design you
don't want the client to touch. No need for DW Templates at all! :)
Slightly OT, but anyway: Is there a way to get DW to display the
contents of SSIs on a
Hi Sammy
***disclaimer***
I work for a Macromedia partner. I do lots of MM related stuff and
like *some* of their gear a fair bit (esp. Coldfusion and Contribute).
...But I have my WSG hat on when on this list - not my MM hat.
*
Yes I've done a fair bit of this over the past 6
On 17 dec 2004, at 01.36, Andreas Boehmer wrote:
The problem is the input style doesn't work in all browsers. In
particular Opera and some of the Mac browsers will ignore them, if I
remember correctly.
A couple of months ago, I spent hours (or was it days?) making
screenshots of styled form
Hi all
Was wondering if someone has some time to check out this *in progress* page I'm
working on:
http://www.xert.com.au/workshop/pbyron628/
I have validated the XHTML and CSS and it appears to be OK on Firefox, Safari,
NS 7.0, Opera 7.5, IE
Mac 5.2.3, but NOT in IE Win 6.
The problem is
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:36:18 +1100, russ - maxdesign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=http://www.css-praxis.de/cssocean/zenoc
ean.css
Make sure you look in a good browser and scroll down!
Russ
Thanks Russ, but as for myself, I believe I like the unpretentious
http://PirateQueen.tk
let me knowwhat you think :)
xx Heb je MSN WebMessenger al ontdekt?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
Is the noscript tag not allowed anymore in XHTML 1.0 Strict? I'm trying
to use it, but it does not validate. If it IS allowed, what markup
should I use to make it validate? Many thanks!
Nick
**
The discussion list for
Nick Verstappen wrote:
You should at least add a (white, or light grey) background color to
the body or div with the main content. If you do, users can start
reading the content even when the background isn't loaded yet (or does
nog load at all).
Excellent suggestion... I did notice that the
??? html 4.01 is the best :)
From: David R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] SiteCheck please
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:38:26 +
Sabrina xxx wrote:
http://PirateQueen.tk http://piratequeen.tk/
let me know what you think :)
xx
%@
Hi,
Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing
the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation.
CK
Thanks for the compliment on the background. Any other suggestions or
critique of the design is welcome off-list
On Thursday, December 16, 2004, at
In your forms.css file, this line is causing the problem:
#search {width:215px; clear:left; padding-top:15px; }
Change the padding-top to 1px or something and it looks normal.
Paul
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
We have plenty of forms on our site and they all behave pretty well, except our
search box. The coding is exactly the same, the style sheets are the same, but
the text input box is huge!
http://www.csatravelprotection.com/csa/help.do
The only variation is the form action. It is referencing a
Check all your styles relating to #search... which appear to be set up
for a form. However, your form is contained in #stack, and #search is
simply an input. The extra height is caused by padding.
The fix is: 1. replace #search with #stack in your css, or 2. change
#stack to #search in your
this is the style we use for our submit button
input.submit {
border: 3px double #999;
border-top-color: #ccc;
border-left-color: #ccc;
padding: 0.15em;
background: #feb333 url(../images/o.gif) repeat-x 0 0;
color: #333;
font-weight: bold;
Hi Kay et al,
Coming in late here. I couldn't find the original post so am not quite
clear about the new common badging apparently to be released? Will
that change the Office of the E-Govt design guidelines which say at
http://www.egov.dpc.wa.gov.au/index.cfm?fuseaction=guidelines.design
Hi, can anyone help me with this please.
I have a class .pmi in my page and I want style the first line of
differently so that the first line is smaller than the second line. The
code below doesn't seem to work and I was wondering if it was because of
the br/ tag in my html.
p class=pmiRead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a class .pmi in my page and I want style the first line of
differently so that the first line is smaller than the second line. The
code below doesn't seem to work and I was wondering if it was because of
the br/ tag in my html.
.pmi p:first-line
To make it work,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:52:38 +0800, Nick Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the main problems with the WA gov sites is that a little over two
years ago a large number of govt departments got amalgamated. Most of my
peers have spent the last couple of years trying to get three, four or
Natalie Buxton wrote:
Why do organisations (be they private or public) continue to blame a
CMS for things like poor validity and accessibility? Choosing a CMS
that comforms the the requirements of well-formed valid (X)HTML and
CSS, as well as good usability and accessibility should surely be
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
What would you recommend is the best way to create a form with a submit
button made up of text+image? So what I have planned is the word
Search followed by a little icon. The user can click either of them
and the form will submit.
How about using a normal submit
100 matches
Mail list logo
