Hi,
Try using picas (pc) or points (pt). I haven't had this problem before
myself, but I believe that it may be caused by the fact that printers
have no concept of what a cm or mm is.
A good description of pc and pt is at
http://www.guistuff.com/css/css_units.html (down the page a bit)
liorean wrote:
(Netscape had originally intended to use the name LiveScript.)
2008/10/28 Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Actually, it was initially released as LiveScript and renamed later.
IIRC Navigator 2.0 also supported a mocha: pseudo-protocol like the
javascript: pseudo-protocol we
Can anyone guide me re. best practice for marking-up physical
addresses that would appear like this:
123 Acacia Avenue
Suburb State Postal Code
Tel 888 9581 4077
Fax 888 9581 2835
Or is it acceptable to keep all in p and use /br's
TIA
Henrik
would have a look at - http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard
From: Henrik Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October, 2008 8:23:07
Subject: [WSG] Mark-up for physical/postal addresses
Can anyone guide me re. best practice
Yep, as Ross said mark it up with Microformats
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Ross Bruniges
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
would have a look at - http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard
--
*From:* Henrik Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
*Sent:*
Personally, IF the address had a name associated with it, I would use a
definition list.
However, there are some purists out there that can't see beyond using a dl
for anything other than defining a word. But John Doe is a term and his
address, phone number, etc are describing him:
John
Why not use the address tag and a definition list? I believe that also
helps a little with localised SEO :)
address
John Doebr /
123 Acacia Avenuebr /
Suburb State Postal Codebr /
/address
dl
dtTel:/dtdd888 9581 4077/dd
dtFax:/dtdd888 9581 2835/dd
/dl
Darren Lovelock
Munky Online Web Design
Darren Lovelock wrote:
Why not use the address tag
Because most addresses on webpages do not provide contact details for
the author.
and a definition list?
Because addresses are not definitions of things.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
Well, what's wrong with microformats? It's really the way to go, and search
engines like yahoo, technorati already use these formats.
There are already quite a lot of generators like this one:
http://microformats.org/code/hcard/creator
No need to do any code, maybe is you want to change the
The address tag was never actually built for addresses (a common
misconception), and addresses are also not lists? I would highly recommend
marking it up with Microformats and using the built in classes to style this
as you need.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Darren Lovelock [EMAIL
I don't think David said anything against microformats.
The problems were with the use of the address element (which should only be
used if it contains the contact details of the person who created a page) and
the use of a definition list as an address for someone is not a definition of
the
When you say support, are you saying that Internet Explorer will not execute
JavaScript, or it will execute JavaScript as JScript? And in the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript link you provided it states that
JavaScript is heavily object-based, so should I assume this as well to be
correct?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 28 October 2008 12:35
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
When you say support, are you saying that Internet Explorer will not
execute
JavaScript, or it will
Actually it did say it is heavily object-based. But now, under Dynamic
Programming -- Objects as associated arrays, it says it is almost entirely
object-based. Looks like it just got updated. Internet Explorer does read
JavaScript, but does it support JavaScript as a whole, or does it read
Hi Everyone,
I'm trying to implement a few features from the mootools library on a
clients web site.
Basically I'm trying to get 3 element to load differently on the page load.
the 1st one is the navigation bar which I think is completed
the second is a div that has a .png image
liorean wrote:
Anyway, by the time the first full
version of Navigator that had it was released (2.0) it had already
been renamed to JavaScript, so I'd hardly say it was released under
the LiveScript name.
Well, at this point I don't know exactly when a version of Navigator
was released
2008/10/28 Brett Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Actually it did say it is heavily object-based. But now, under Dynamic
Programming -- Objects as associated arrays, it says it is almost entirely
object-based. Looks like it just got updated. Internet Explorer does read
JavaScript, but does it
There is only one JavaScript, as created by Netscape. Though it can be used
for other things, such as programming an application, I think that is worded
right.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
liorean wrote:
Anyway, by the time the first full
JScript was originally created as an exact reverse engineering of
Javascript (including the mistakes), so that IE could read pages with
javascript on them. This was of course, during the browser wars when
they were competing for features. Jscript has fallen a bit behind
Javascript by now, so there
div id=leftcol
a href=#
h2 class=cosanhead
*(I need this heading to have a negative left margin over the leftcol
div but it wont budge)*
/h2
/a
..
/div
heres the css :
a:link h2.cosanhead {
height:90px; margin-left:-57px; width:150px;
can anyone help me with this?
Many Thanks
Mathew O'Connor
http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net/
0800 3277935
_
Disclaimer: This email and its attachments may be confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
views or
Hi,
Try swapping the order of the h2 and anchor to start with, the solution
will be a lot easier.
L
kevin mcmonagle wrote:
div id=leftcol
a href=#
h2 class=cosanhead
*(I need this heading to have a negative left margin over the leftcol
div but it wont budge)*
It says the page validates. And I visited it, but don't see no problems with
it.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can anyone help me with this?
Many Thanks
Mathew O'Connor
http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net/
0800 3277935
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kevin mcmonagle
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:37 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] need to get a negative margin working
div id=leftcol
a href=#
h2
Is there any way to code css (not conditional inline css), so that the CSS
apply online to FF?
--
Fuji kusaka
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Hi,
This list isn't really a help desk. For such things Google is your friend.
Anyway, there are various methods/hacks available. My preference is to
use child selectors
eg
#container .something {
/* this will be used in ie6 */
}
#container .something {
/* this will be used in
Hi Guys,
I am dealing with a very large website, with around 20 000 PDF files.
I want to test if these PDFs are Compliant with W3C standards. I know that some
of these files will be I just want to find the ones which aren't.
Does anyone know of a good tool to use to test PDF files. I currently
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 14:39 +1000, Thiru Yoganathan wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am dealing with a very large website, with around 20 000 PDF files.
I want to test if these PDFs are Compliant with W3C standards. I know
that some of these files will be I just want to find the ones which
I've been looking into this recently too.
I found a lot of info from Adobe of how accessible Acrobat can be made, but my
experience was that it takes a long time to set them up properly.
The success (or not) comes from how cleanly the pages were set up in the first
place, with proper heading
29 matches
Mail list logo
