Seems to me that Providers of Miniature Clips for Business is more of a tag
line and not really appropriate to put in an h1 heading.
--
Brett P.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:10, EBS Admin
ad...@essentialebizsolutions.netwrote:
No but you can wrap MiniClip - Providers of Miniature Clips for
EBS Admin, from what I read it looked like it was a motto, not some
keywords.
--
Brett P.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:29, EBS Admin
ad...@essentialebizsolutions.netwrote:
Hi Darren,
Maybe if you read what I wrote properly you would see that the
H1 surrounding the logo has
Hi all! Does anyone know a good Usenet group that deals with Perl, NFAs and
Java? I need one that deals with all three together, and would like to have
more specific groups that deal with each one in particular, as well.
Please reply off-list, as this is off-topic from the group.
Regards,
--
Please remove this user from the group ASAP!
--
Brett P.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan
danielpaulro...@googlemail.com wrote:
Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone!
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns
desi...@tapirdesigns.co.ukwrote:
I
Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!!
--
Brett P.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty ton...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for that I think we should keep him on!
--
*From*: Brett Patterson
*Date*: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 -0400
*To*: wsg
I agree with James. Although, I find the best possible, all-around solution
is to use all of the above! If the user does not have JavaScript/cookies
enabled, then the user will use their browser, else they cannot view the
text in large size. If the user does have JavaScript/cookies enabled, then
I am not sure about the most recent standards regarding the language
attribute of the SCRIPT tag within an HTML page, so I would like to know if
it is still recommended to use the language attribute within the SCRIPT
tag?
And what version, if it is recommended to use that attribute, would one
, Brett Patterson wrote:
I am not sure about the most recent standards regarding the language
attribute of the SCRIPT tag within an HTML page, so I would like to know if
it is still recommended to use the language attribute within the SCRIPT
tag?
And what version, if it is recommended to use
It has recently come to my attention the struggles of an end-user when
viewing images for any user. I have seen sites such as Facebook, MySpace,
and other sites where pictures are hosted use roll-overs for recognizing
certain parts of an image. I realize that this can be done using image maps
as
Have you used the CSS: background-position: center center; ?
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Ben Dodson b...@bendodson.com wrote:
It does of course require JavaScript which isn't strictly necessary as you
can get the same effect with just CSS (especially for the purposes
Getting back on subject, I do not think the box model has been fixed in IE7,
but I do not know for sure. You might try adding margin for separation with
containing div tags in browsers.
--
Brett P.
Is the box model in IE7 still messed up? I thought they sorted it?
I am floating a div to the
Well, good deal then. :)
--
Brett P.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Rimantas Liubertas riman...@gmail.comwrote:
Getting back on subject, I do not think the box model has been fixed in
IE7,
but I do not know for sure. You might try adding margin for separation
with
containing div
I have always been told to use something along the lines of either body {
font-size: 100%; /* a fix for internet explorer */ } because of the way IE
reads/sizes font. Starting out with html at only 62.5% font-sizing would
completely mess up IE and the font in the browser would it not?
--
Brett P.
% as a minimum as the basic
reading size below which it's a straign on the eyes.
I personally don't mess with browser defaults and don't tend to use resets,
but for minimal purposes only.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
I have always been
Forgot to mention that you do set specific formatting on text afterwards, as
you mentioned, Janice. And I might add that that is a good point Christian,
it does seem a little silly!
--
Brett P.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
Well
Would using:
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
}
before the body to zero out all margins, paddings and borders, cause any
accessibility problems or any problems one should be made aware of before
using it for layout?
--
Brett P.
Okay, thank you all. I will use the Yahoo! Graded Browser Support matrix for
information.
--
Brett P.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Ted Drake tdr...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
The Yahoo! Graded Browser Support matrix is a good standard of what
browsers are appropriately supported.
Hi all,
I was just reading from a book that talked about some code that would not
work in Internet Explorer 3.0, but would in Internet Explorer 4.0 and later,
and Netscape Navigator 3.0 and later. This brought up a question that I
could not find direct and consistent answers while searching the
You might could try the custom installation when installing and then
creating and naming a different folder in your Program Files folder...name
it something different than the currently installed Safari browser's
folder...
--
Brett P.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Gregorio Espadas
Yea, I would never consider allowing it on any project I am working on
either...I was actually asking because I have heard that it could be done,
but never really understood (maybe, come to think of it, heard) what the
downfalls were. I do, now, thanks to you and Russ Weakley.
--
Brett P.
On
Hey all, a quick question, consider the following code:
div id=id-name!-- Containing Div Tag --
div class=first-class!-- Contains the first content to appear (let's
say) --
p class=informationContent goes here on line 1/p
/div
div class=second-class!-- Contains the second content here... --
p
this instead of what
is applied at the top?:::
.information.more-styles
{
styles: here;
}
--
Brett P.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Pennell
matthewpenn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
Note the space
tutorials for lazy people.
On 17/02/2009, at 5:25, Brett Patterson inspiron.patters...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will a div tag pick up the height of an image that is floated left? I have
an image that is floated to the left and an unordered list that I am trying
to get to move to the right side
Will a div tag pick up the height of an image that is floated left? I have
an image that is floated to the left and an unordered list that I am trying
to get to move to the right side of an image, in a horizontal layout...the
unordered list (navigation bar) is also in a horizontal line position. I
on my personal MySpace page to see the results...my MySpace page can be seen
at http://www.myspace.com/irontombraider
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
To Mike, with what I am currently applying this code to it won't work
Hi all,
I was wondering why there was no implementation to allow a semi-transparent
background color using CSS? If there is, is there a link that would point me
in the direction to figure out how to go about implementing it on a Web
page?
--
Brett P.
:04 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering why there was no implementation to allow a
semi-transparent background color using CSS? If there is, is there a link
that would point me in the direction to figure out how to go about
implementing it on a Web page?
--
Brett P
Okay, one quick question. You say 200% is twice the default size, but in
browsers like Firefox 3, there is only the (shortcut) Ctrl++ to zoom in, and
I cannot find the percentage of that zoom, so is 200% font size increasement
one or two clicks?
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:47 AM,
Hello All,
I am in the process of working on my portfolio. It is not complete yet, but
one problem with my navigation menu on the top exists. Although it is a
minor pixel alignment in Opera, I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why
only Opera is aligning my tabs (which are the top part of my
IE
differently then all the other browsers update their own. Microsoft does not
really use v3.0.8 like Firefox would, 9.26 like Opera would, etc.
--
Brett P.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
I really don't understand what you mean, when you
where most of my
problems have stemmed from.
--
Brett P.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
bhawkesle...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/2/09 20:13, Brett Patterson wrote:
I really don't understand what you mean, when you say:
It's a designer-bug. Vertical position
I really don't understand what you mean, when you say:
It's a designer-bug. Vertical position of the navigation relies entirely
on font size, which means it is all over the place in my browsers on
first load.
No two browsers calculate font size exactly the same before rendering,
so relying
the future of the
Web. The browser vendors? the coders/developers? us? or just everyone in
cooperation?
2009/1/20 Brett Patterson inspiron.patters...@gmail.com
Okay, long time posted in this subject. I see where Benjamin is heading
with his discussions, and I agree with him. Took me awhile
Okay, I understand. Thanks.
--
Brett P.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Simon Moss si...@simonmoss.co.uk wrote:
Isn't it because the img tag when within an anchor tag will by default show
a blue border around it - behaviour from the days before css? Separate
behaviour from the anchor tag
Brett Patterson inspiron.patters...@gmail.com
Okay. That makes sense.
--
Brett P.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Dorward da...@dorward.me.ukwrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
So, my question is this. Why does the image tag have to have the border
placed on it, instead of placing
I concur with Benjamin.
Try to use Flash only where it is needed. Many rich media sites such
as Google's YouTube use Flash for rich media but rely on HTML for
content and navigation. You can too, by limiting Flash to on-page
accents and rich media, not content and navigation. In addition to
I agree with Steve and Nancy. Have you tried to convert .mov into .mpeg, or
similar?
Try using sourceforge.net to locate some file format converters.
And as far as embedding a movie or similar, have you searched alistapart.com
?
And might I suggest http://www.delicious.com/irontombraider?
I
Okay. That makes sense.
--
Brett P.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Dorward da...@dorward.me.uk wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
So, my question is this. Why does the image tag have to have the border
placed on it, instead of placing the border or text-decoration styles
Hi all,
I do not know if this has been asked before, and if it has I apologize for
asking again, but consider the following code:
a href=http://www.mozilla.org; class=small-namesimg
src=images/mozillalogos/mozilla/mozillafoundation.png alt=Mozilla
Foundation title=Mozilla Foundation
I hope I can throw my 2 cents in. Not trying to argue, but to TRY and answer
some questions.
A question was asked early in this thread about what are the benefits of
using Flash? There's been no answer to that question. I was hoping to
learn
some answers because I've been confused about why
THANK YOU!!! I could not agree with you more. And in the same since, I think
we agree with each other.
Congratulations on an argument well-played. And well-thought!!!
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, James Ducker james.duc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi WSG,
This entire argument is
Christie, your argument is about the most ridiculous argument there is.
Everything you have stated is SOLELY about you and your personal
preferences. Observe:
I'm not a highly visual person, I even prefer reading data to being given a
graph.
So what? *NONE OF THIS IS ABOUT YOU!!!* Your
The below was to James Ducker.
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
THANK YOU!!! I could not agree with you more. And in the same since, I
think we agree with each other.
Congratulations on an argument well-played. And well
Pardon the language, but Hell no. For a number of different reasons. Among
that being, I can't work with the code as good as I can with Microsoft's and
the fact that it costs too much money. Although it is proprietary, I can
recode most of what I need to do (Microsoft's code). To say I disagree
hard to do, but it can be done.
--
Brett P.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Brett Patterson
inspiron.patters...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon the language, but Hell no. For a number of different reasons. Among
that being, I can't work with the code as good as I can with Microsoft's and
the fact
And we do agree. But again, NOT THE POINT, although it may be wrong, it may
need to be designed accessible in the first place, it hasn't, so don't argue
the point. End it at the fact that something needs to be done and people are
ignorant. BCAT is doing what people should be doing, fixing things
Recently, I experimented with changing check boxes with JavaScript. If the
user clicked on the words next to the check box, then the box would be
checked, once checked if the user clicked again, then the box would be
unchecked. I wound up having to apply the same code to the check box itself
in
, tatham.oddie.com.au
*From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On
Behalf Of *Brett Patterson
*Sent:* Wednesday, 7 January 2009 12:08 AM
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
*Subject:* [WSG] JavaScript as External File vs. Internal Code and linking
to images
To All,
I was playing around with a page where I found out that just about
everything that I wanted to do I had to use:
function namedFunction(layer)
{
var whatever = document.getElementById(layer);
* // other code here.*
}
And I got really annoyed at having to either copy and paste or
Hi Steve,
How could another method change the element the identifier variable is
pointing at? I thought that that could only occur if I changed the id
attribute or the variable itself, or the argument (here
namedFunction('timer')) where timer is the argument?
Hi Chris,
Is not acceptable to put
, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Brett Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To All,
I was playing around with a page where I found out that just about
everything that I wanted to do I had to use:
function namedFunction(layer)
{
var whatever
I am trying to put a video on the Web, but I cannot get it to play
automatically. I want to have them stream so that they will play immediately
instead of lagging a minute or so when clicked on. Is there a
standard/recommended way to do this? Links for reading about it would be
greatly
It is. At least as far as I knew it to be. This is why I said to use the
span tag.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Am I confused? I thought h2 was a block-level element.
On Mon, December 1, 2008 6:32 pm, Andrew famiano wrote:
I'm trying to set a
As well as from mine. Did any of the above solve your problem? And what does
OP mean?
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that the OP miss-stated the problem. From my understanding, he
wants the BGcolor to extend for _only_ the width of the TEXT, not for the
or you could just do h2span class=helloYour Header Text
Here/span/h2.
And in your CSS, .hello {background-color: color;}
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Сергей Кириченко [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
1. float:left
2. position:absolute
3.insert span with bg into H2
and non standart trick
What Dave?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Dave Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:18 +, David Dorward wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
Where could I find a good information site about the
document.images.imageId script line, please?
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998
From what I have read so far, you are pretty much agreeing with me. Hence,
David, you said and I quote, HTML 5 is Everything you need to know to
build a browser with some definition of HTML, XHTML, DOM, SQL and HTTP in
it., therefore, HTML5 (not to be confused with xHTML or XHTML), is being
phased
Sorry, forgot to add, that the purpose of XHTML, from what some of the top
designers and working group members have stated, I may have misinterpreted,
but XHTML was built to help designers/developers transition from HTML to
XML.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Brett Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples),
has deprecated the use of the name attribute. That being said, my
question is, Why was the name attribute deprecated?.
Because (on the elements upon which
1) That, I do believe is a crock of shit!2) If he does anything like that,
he will be dead!!!
--and--
3) Anyone who believes in those ideas are fucked up, stupid, and this I can
promise, will NOT make it in this world, dead or alive!
4) Like I said, I think this a crock of shit, and possibly
PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
So I thought. But why, when using JavaScript can you not target the ID
of an element such as an image?
You can.
You can target the name, but not the ID,
Incorrect.
not without document.getElementById
Why would you want to do it without
No, I may have to disagree. GIF files are (a majority of them, if not all,
are) smaller. They have to be. Considering GIF only supports up to a maximum
of 256 colors. (it is 8-bit). Try
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/gif-jpg-png-whats-difference/
---or---
at 10:24 -0500, Brett Patterson wrote:
I have no idea why, but for some reason I cannot remember which is
read first! Are scripts or styles read first?
As others have mentioned, they are read in the order they occur in the
document.
And which is the recommended order to list them? Styles
First of all, No I am not! Second I have tried out differences. Notice the
difference in file sizes. Thirdly, I did not say that png did not support
8-bit, nowhere does it say that, it does however say that GIF only supports
a maximum of 256 colors. Fourthly, Todd your argument is off subject,
OK. So, lets agree that (Start here quoting you:::If you're not using a
decent compressor then png's are 15% - 20% oversized.:::end quoting you
here.) we are both right. I am simply stating as such without using a
compressor (Start quoting you:::If you're not using a decent compressor then
png's
From the few recent posts, I have become so far confused, as anyone would as
to why, Gunlaug, you keep stating xHTML5 or as above you say XHTML5? HTML
and xHTML/XHTML are different. xHTML is XHTML, albeit 1.0 or 1.1 or 2.0 etc.
So, is it a typo?
--
Brett P.
I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples), has
deprecated the use of the name attribute. That being said, my question is,
Why was the name attribute deprecated?.
--
Brett P.
***
List Guidelines:
That is strange, the examples didn't show. Any idea as to why?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Brett Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples), has
deprecated the use of the name attribute. That being said, my question is,
Why
Yes, and colors in a row or horizontal line, so to speak, compress better
depending on the compression mechanism. Just say that jpeg files
read/compress horizontal, and gif files read/compress vertical, not sure if
that is exactly correct, just an example. But iii (if the size is 1
pixel wide
As someone who has read the post, in Dreamweaver 8, to follow along with
Todd's statement, choose (File -- New) and under the General tab choose
Starter Pages. You may choose from the list DW8 has. The rest I agree with.
Try learning some of the code from the pre-existing sites, modify one
section
I have, rather unfortunately, entered into an argument with a couple
colleagues about the future of HTML/XHTML/XML. So, I was wondering, based on
everyone's expertise level here who is right.
I say that in the years coming, maybe 20 years from now, who knows, but
eventually HTML and XHTML will be
OK. For the last almost 24 hours, I have been trying to get the link to the
results posted on the server to work, but have failed miserably. The results
were made public to subscribers of the newsletters they mail out every
month. They have not yet decided to use the Internet to mail out the
I know that most, if not possible to say all, Web page designers use
JavaScript for form validation. During a recent poll done by a few local
colleges, 41.2% of the people who responded stated that they would rather
not have to enable JavaScript, but on rare occasion they do for certain
sites that
OK. I had forgotten you could use server-side validation. Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember to use server side validation and you don't need to worry about
rewriting standards :)
Brett Patterson wrote:
I know that most
How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the
user has changed it?
Without clicking on a refresh/reload button on the page but instead using
the browser's button.
*The XHTML Transitional code I have is*:
tddiv class=inmiddleof
label for=hsQty/label
button? input type=reset
value=Reset!? You lost me on the but instead using the browser's
button.. what button?
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the
user has changed it?
Without clicking on a refresh
button? input type=reset
value=Reset!? You lost me on the but instead using the browser's
button.. what button?
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the
user has changed it?
Without clicking on a refresh
is because for some reason, unknown to me, it is a major part of
my grade.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I guess use onbeforeunload to trigger an event?
http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/demos/OnBeforeUnloadDemo1.htm
On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Brett
Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form
field when page is refreshed the same. It does not remove it.
There are no code examples, and I have exhausted the library and internet
resources.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Todd Budnikas [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
your problem, but would be a
gateway for you to write something that does.
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form
field when page is refreshed the same. It does not remove it.
There are no code examples, and I
Ah, ok, I got it figured out thanks.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form
field when page is refreshed the same. It does not remove
I hate to ask another question about JavaScript, but I need help with ONE
more thing, please?
*Using the following JS code in XHTML Transitional:*
function proc()
{
var num = document.heartSearch.hsQty.value*8.95;
document.hSearchoutput.hsTotal.value = r2(num);
}
function prc2()
{
var num
I agree with everyone!!! NEVER EVER give out your information like that.
Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(computer_security)because
it sounds like a Social-Engineering attack!!
You are right.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Andrew Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I
Change the OL tag color:red, and then use the span color:blue for your span.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Антон Грахов [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
how to change color of numbers in items OL list, but do not change
color of text in items?
My idea with inner span:
CSS code:
li
And I'll bring the empty belly.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I'll bring the beer! :)
Sent from my iPhone.
On 06/11/2008, at 8:53 PM, 8bits Media [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Russ,
Will you be bringing a cake?
Nick.
On 6 Nov 2008, at
Are these away on leave notices from people who manage the
webstandardsgroup.org site? Or individual people? It is kinda getting
annoying?
--
Brett P.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e-mail
addresses. Sorry, did not mean to exasperate the issue. I did not know it
was one.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Just auto replies from list members away on leave (who have set their
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] Who are the Away on leave Notices from?
document:
wasChristie Mason
received
by:
at:11/05/2008 13:41:14
_
Sorry, could not resist. ;)
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:48
What?
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Ashley Butler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop emailing me!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2008 3:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject:
There are conditional CSS HTML codes that can apply to FF. If you want to
use them, you can try:
!--[if N]!--link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=the
location.css /!--![endif]--
If the above does not work, try adding an additional N in !--[if N]!--,
as in !--[if NN]!--.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008
I like that explanation. I get it now. Thanks. One more quick question
though, what is a let-block, in general? Thanks. That really does make it a
lot easier to understand.
Brett
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Patterson skrev:
I am sorry, but I must
OK. Thanks
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Keryx Web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Patterson skrev:
I like that explanation. I get it now. Thanks. One more quick question
though, what is a let-block, in general? Thanks. That really does make it a
lot easier to understand.
Brett
When you say support, are you saying that Internet Explorer will not execute
JavaScript, or it will execute JavaScript as JScript? And in the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript link you provided it states that
JavaScript is heavily object-based, so should I assume this as well to be
correct?
JavaScript as JScript?
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brett Patterson
Sent: 28 October 2008 12:35
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please
When you say support
There is only one JavaScript, as created by Netscape. Though it can be used
for other things, such as programming an application, I think that is worded
right.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Hassan Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
liorean wrote:
Anyway, by the time the first full
It says the page validates. And I visited it, but don't see no problems with
it.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can anyone help me with this?
Many Thanks
Mathew O'Connor
http://www.essentialebizsolutions.net/
0800 3277935
Yes. But, one final question. Was the *first ever* implementation of
JavaScript designed to be object-oriented, object-based, or prototype-based?
Thank you all.
Oh and to David and Christian, in regards to the w3schools, I reread parts
of their site, and I understand now what you mean. My
I am sorry, but I must ask. Are you saying that the term JavaScript is owned
by Sun? Or just the Java part? And, yes, JavaScript is implemented in
Internet Explorer.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, great.
It was my intent to acknowledge some
Have you tried:
ul li:hover
{
list-style-type: circle;
}
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:04 PM, kevin mcmonagle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The list-style appears on the li element. The selector li a:hover
matches the a element, which isn't display: list-item and so can't
have a list marker.
Uh...yeah. Both the virtual and physical ones.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Andrew Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know but people still read magazines?
On 25-Oct-08, at 5:22 PM, Edward Clarke wrote:
Andrew,
I'm not sure who those questions were aimed at but does the medium matter
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
