Hi again,
Thanks for all the recent advice.
I'll modfy the CSS so that the site can better handle font re-sizing. I'm not sure how much success I'll have, though, as the current page layout does not really accommodate large font sizes.
My take on this is that layouts should be tested against
that your feedback will enable me to solve this problem.
Thank you in advance for your kind assistance.I appreciate it very much.
Kind regards
David Nicol
www.nbcommunication.com
Hi again,
Thanks for your help. Although I have not yet been able to verify what caused the problem, I'm glad that no-one else seems to be having the same issues.
Cheers
David
Hello everyone,
What can I say? Your advice and assistance has been tremendous. I completely appreciate it.
It looks like I've got a bit of work to do sorting out a series of problems with the site. I'll get stuck into this work and will, I hope, geteverything working properly before the
Hi Roberto,
Many thanks for spotting this.
Much appreciated.
Cheers
David
http://www.nbcommunication.com
On 1/12/06, Roberto Santana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello David,
I've just check your site, its fantastic, but I've discovered a bug. If you're at cart.cfm page with some products added
Hi everyone,
I'd appreciate it very much if you could take a quick look at: http://www.shetlandcoffee.com/
All comments welcome. In particular, please let me know if you spot anything that I'd need to fix before my client begins to promote the site.
Thank you in advance.
Kind regards
David
Hi Peter,
Many thanks for spotting this. I'll get on to it right away.
Cheers
David
http://www.nbcommunication.com
There appears to be some problems in FF1.5 in WinXP in your headersection.Location of screen shot:
http://www.maestropublishing.com/examples/shetlandcoffe_ss.png
://www.shetlandcoffee.com/ All comments welcome. In particular, please let me know if you spot anything that I'd need to fix before my client begins to promote the site.
Thank you in advance. Kind regards David Nicol www.nbcommunication.com http://www.nbcommunication.com
Thomas, Collin,
Thanks for your feedback. I'll re-visit the header part again and will hopefully get it to look right in all browsers.
cheers
David
http://www.nbcommunication.com
Hi all,
Weused Textpattern for http://www.bustahouse.com/and http://www.selfcateringshetland.com/
It's a really nice solution for putting together sites. My main concern with Textpattern is teaching clients how to use it, as the sections/categories model is sometimes a little tricky for them to
Thank Peter.
I had totally forgotten about the NYPL styleguide, something that I
studied extensively in the past.
Thanks for the reminder.
Cheers
David
J Zeldman had a lot of input to the New York Public Library Styleguide
which incoroprates a lot of the sort of info your are wanting I
Hello all,
I often hire freelancers to do visual design and template coding work for me.
To make project communication easier I plan to draw up a document to
detail my requirements with regard to standards-compliant coding and
accessibility. It is my intention that this document would be
Thanks for the excellent link Michael - much appreciated.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Textpattern gets my vote too - I've found that it is very flexible.
We've used it for several sites including www.cope.ltd.uk and
www.selfcateringshetland.com. All the sites we've used it for so far
have been static, i.e. 'non-blog' - there is no real problem setting
this up once you understand
in front of the image … lota depends on
designer.
Hmmm… I think these suggestions make sense.
Please let me know what do you think.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Amit Pimpalnerkar
David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
Please do not be scared to be critical. I'm keen to improve the site
in any way possible, so please let me know what you think we could do
better.
FYI, I'm not convinced
Prabhath,
Thanks for your thoughts about the Advanced Search - I totally agree
that we need to improve this element. We'll experiment with some
ideas.
Regarding the banner, we will be selling this space again soon. I'm
not sure if it would be sensible to retain a 'veto' on the banner
designs
admit that I hadn't
checked this out before, so it is hugely informative.
Thanks again
David
On 8/2/05, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Nicol wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site
:
David Nicol wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
David
Nice stuff(I mean Salmon), David. I had to go rather extraordinary means
to find any problem-- if, in fact, some
Ed
I'm inclined to agree with you about there being no need to duplicate
'salmon' so much.
We did debate this quite a lot in the office, and I suspect we'll
change this next time we do any work on the menu system.
cheers
David
On 8/2/05, Ed Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initial
, David Nicol wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
Please do not be scared to be critical. I'm keen to improve the site
in any way possible, so please let me know what you think we could do
Hello everyone,
I am seraching for a standards-compliant classified ad solution.
The best non-compliant solution I've found is this:
http://www.geodesicsolutions.com/products/classifieds/classifieds_enterprise.htm
Does anyone know of a standards-compliant solution that is comparable to this?
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the group
I would be very grateful if someone could direct me to an existing
resource or article addressing the subject of how a validly-coded web
site can fail to be truly accessible. i.e. why valid code is not, in
itself, enough to guarantee
23 matches
Mail list logo
