Firefox 1.07. The siute stayed unstyled despite 10 or so Ctrl+F5's.
--ZacharyOn 3/2/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming wrote: Why must I have _javascript_ enabled for the site to be styled?Um... You don't need to, although IE users without script enabled withhave
If I may make one suggestion, you should allow the white content box to
either resize vertically or scroll. The text goes a good distance
out of the box on my laptop (Default font settings on laptops are
120DPI, vs the Default 96DPI on desktops).
--ZacharyOn 2/3/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor [EMAIL
In addition to making sure that all of the Doctypes and header
information shows that its Japanese, you may look into Apache's
multiple language support (If you're using Apache, that is).
Resources:
Multiple language support with the Apache webserver
Apache Module mod_mime
--ZacharyOn 2/3/06,
Use em or %.
Em is probably the best, but since IE6 has font-size:large as the
default, using font-size:1em for the body makes stuff look big in IE.
I usually use %'s. These work well, like the em, but it compensates for IE's larger-than-normal font size.
--ZacharyOn 2/2/06, Roberto Santana
?
- Overall, do you believe that the Content first principle is a valid one?
--Zachary
On 2/1/06, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming said: [is it] better that the content all comes first?Mark Pilgrim [1], Sarah Horton (of Web Style Guide Fame, in her latestbook) and others say
Does anyone have any ideas or thoughts on my question?
--ZacharyOn 1/30/06, Hopkins Programming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I re-did my website (http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/) a while back in an effort to update its look and improve the quality of the coding behind it.
Right now
Hi Zachary,I just have noticed that your web site does not meet the requirementsfor WAI AA and AAA.But it is really beautiful.Best,JohnHome: http://www.webnauts.net
Redesign in process: http://www.webnauts.net/redesign/Hopkins Programming wrote: Does anyone have any ideas or thoughts on my q
Hello all!
I re-did my website (http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/) a while back in an effort to update its look and improve the quality of the coding behind it.
Right now, it looks perfect, just like I want it to. But, I need
to improve/clean up the XHTML coding behind it - eg, properly
Forgive me, but that seems to be a complicated way of doing things...
Why not break the image up into 2 parts and make the entire left half
an a:href with css hover? The absolute positioning doesn't seem
necessary.
--Zachary On 1/10/06, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,I'm having problem
Yeah!
The best way to do this is to assign an ID tag to the body.
== Example =
Page1:
body id=page1
a href="" class=link_Page1
a href="" class=link_Page2
/body
Page2:
body id=page2
a href="" class=link_Page1
a href="" class=link_Page2
/body
CSS:
body#page1
Take away the height restrictions on
#homenewsleft and #homenewsright--Zachary
On 11/16/05, Ben Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folksI am having a few problems with the way my footer is sitting in Firefox:I am using some templates based on the glish 3 column fixed width template.HTML
not themost important links on your site.For the most part though, things look fine though. It sure beats most of
the sites on the internet.Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Hopkins Programming wrote: @All - Still need suggestions on the WAI conundrum.
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/ Well, I think you should
@Alan - I'm still working on the subsequent pages. The home page is all ive updated at the moment.
Thx for the heads up.
@All - Still need suggestions on the WAI conundrum.
Thanks all!
---ZacharyOn 10/3/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Hey guys,
If you wouldn't mind checking out my website,
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/, I would greatly appreciate
it. There is one thing in particular I would like help with - On
the homepage, the 3 large images are divs w/background images, and
display:block hyperlinks. It works fine, but
?
Although I design for in Firefox/Opera, I always make sure the
text can size properly, given IE's +2 -2 operation. But
should I go further?
Thanks!
--ZacharyOn 10/2/05, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming wrote: http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/Your px sized containers aren't
Ok guys, I've reworked some of the heights and background images to allow for extended text resizing.
I think I got all of the big stuff, does it look work ok for you now Felix?
--ZacharyOn 10/2/05, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm says:use
Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming wrote: http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/ Ok guys, I've reworked some of the heights and background images to allow for extended text resizing.
I think I got all of the big stuff, does it look work ok for you now Felix?You're still not giving
You could use Apache's Content Negotiation.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/content-negotiation.html
I'm not sure about the passed parameters though.
--Zachary
On 4/20/05, Mr Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still used to most of this web stuff and havespent most of my time with the design part
I looked into this once. It was a little over my head, but maybe it
can help you -
http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol3/css_no15.htm
--Zachary
On Apr 6, 2005 10:31 AM, tomcask o_o [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will wish to use external fonts (noncommon to pcs, obtained through
server by the
Will do Rick!
Thanks Dean!
:-D
--Zachary
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:55:41 +1100, Dean Burge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick,
h2's on search page have wrong title values. A couple of }}'s messing
up your CSS validation.
-db
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 2005 06:56:56 -0500, Hopkins Programming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will do Rick!
Thanks Dean!
:-D
--Zachary
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:55:41 +1100, Dean Burge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick,
h2's on search page have wrong title values. A couple of }}'s messing
up your CSS
Hey guys!
I've recently re-done my website. Can ya give it a once-over and let
me know if you find any obvious problems (such as errors in the html
or css, or anything that make it not WAI-AAA or 508 compliant)?
Comments for or against the design are definitely welcomed. :-)
Website URI:
Can't you just set the width and set them all to float:left?
--Zachary
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:15:41 +0100, Carlos Rincon Sanchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but i known this. I'm looking for a model with less hacks and no
negative margins.
El mié, 16-03-2005 a las 12:49, pixeldiva
There is some CSS3 support in Firefox and maybe Opera, I believe.
--Zachary
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:02:22 -0500, ByteDreams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie, I admit, so allow me to ask a dumb question. Are there any
browsers currently supporting some of these CSS3 modules? I sure would
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
Read more at: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#docconf
--Zachary
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:11:21 -0330, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the pure transitional doctype:
25 matches
Mail list logo
